Loading…

Modeling a Multitarget Attacker–Defender Game with Budget Constraints

Though the choices of terrorists’ attack targets are vast, their resources are limited. In this paper, a game-theoretical model is proposed to study both the defender’s (government) and the attacker’s (terrorist) expenditures among multiple targets under budget constraints to guide investment in def...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Decision analysis 2017-06, Vol.14 (2), p.87-107
Main Authors: Guan, Peiqiu, He, Meilin, Zhuang, Jun, Hora, Stephen C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9b94e41dcc3fa6f4c67b3112afd2db26c7d20c2e10b0f736ba1fb171b05776503
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9b94e41dcc3fa6f4c67b3112afd2db26c7d20c2e10b0f736ba1fb171b05776503
container_end_page 107
container_issue 2
container_start_page 87
container_title Decision analysis
container_volume 14
creator Guan, Peiqiu
He, Meilin
Zhuang, Jun
Hora, Stephen C
description Though the choices of terrorists’ attack targets are vast, their resources are limited. In this paper, a game-theoretical model is proposed to study both the defender’s (government) and the attacker’s (terrorist) expenditures among multiple targets under budget constraints to guide investment in defense. We study how the defender’s and the attacker’s equilibrium allocations depend on the budget constraints, target valuations, cost effectiveness of their investments, and inherent defense levels of targets in both sequential-move and simultaneous-move games. The equilibrium solutions are provided using the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions. At the subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium, the defender’s total marginal effects are the same among targets. Moreover, the defender’s total marginal effects can be decomposed into direct and indirect effects. We also use the multiple-infrastructure and multiple-urban-area data sets to demonstrate the model results. The regression analysis shows that both the attacker’s and the defender’s equilibrium investments increase with their own target valuations, because a higher valuation for themselves means a higher attractiveness. Interestingly, the attacker’s equilibrium investment is negatively correlated with the defender’s target valuations, since a higher defender’s valuation would make it more difficult for the attacker to successfully attack the target. By contrast, the defender’s equilibrium investment is positively correlated with the attacker’s target valuations, as a higher attacker’s valuations would increase the urgency for the defender to protect the target. To show the utility of the new model, we compare the results of this model and the model in which the defender assumes that only a single target will be attacked when there could actually be multiple targets attacked. Our results show that the defender will suffer higher expected losses if she assumes that the attacker will attack only one target. The analysis of the attacker’s and the defender’s budget constraints show that (a) the higher the budget the defender has, the less likely it is that her most valuable target will be attacked; (b) a higher proportion of defense resources should be allocated to the most valuable target if the defender’s budget is low; and (c) the attacker is less concentrated on attacking the most valuable target and spreads the resources to attack more targets as his budget increases.
doi_str_mv 10.1287/deca.2017.0346
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss__A497860269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A497860269</galeid><sourcerecordid>A497860269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9b94e41dcc3fa6f4c67b3112afd2db26c7d20c2e10b0f736ba1fb171b05776503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0kFr2zAUB3BTNmjX9dqzYbDTnEmyLNnHNO3SQsIu21nI0pOj1JZbSabtrd9h33CfZDbt6AKGIZCE-D3pCf5Jco7RApOSf9Wg5IIgzBcop-woOcEFLbKyQPTd3z2t0HHyIYQ9QiSvGD5J1tteQ2tdk8p0O7TRRukbiOkyRqluwf9-_nUJBpwGn65lB-mDjbv0YtATWvUuRC-ti-Fj8t7INsDZ63qa_Px29WN1nW2-r29Wy02mCkpiVtUVBYq1UrmRzFDFeJ1jTKTRRNeEKa4JUgQwqpHhOaslNjXmuEYF56xA-Wny6eXeO9_fDxCi2PeDd-OTgrCRMMJK_qYa2YKwzvRjm6qzQYklrXjJEGHVqLIZ1YADL9vegbHj8YFfzPhxaOismi34fFAwmgiPsZFDCOIQfvkH1kOwDsI4BdvsYnjxc40o34fgwYg7bzvpnwRGYsqCmLIgpiyIKQtvP52a9l34n_8DraqzzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2677662687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling a Multitarget Attacker–Defender Game with Budget Constraints</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Informs</source><creator>Guan, Peiqiu ; He, Meilin ; Zhuang, Jun ; Hora, Stephen C</creator><creatorcontrib>Guan, Peiqiu ; He, Meilin ; Zhuang, Jun ; Hora, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><description>Though the choices of terrorists’ attack targets are vast, their resources are limited. In this paper, a game-theoretical model is proposed to study both the defender’s (government) and the attacker’s (terrorist) expenditures among multiple targets under budget constraints to guide investment in defense. We study how the defender’s and the attacker’s equilibrium allocations depend on the budget constraints, target valuations, cost effectiveness of their investments, and inherent defense levels of targets in both sequential-move and simultaneous-move games. The equilibrium solutions are provided using the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions. At the subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium, the defender’s total marginal effects are the same among targets. Moreover, the defender’s total marginal effects can be decomposed into direct and indirect effects. We also use the multiple-infrastructure and multiple-urban-area data sets to demonstrate the model results. The regression analysis shows that both the attacker’s and the defender’s equilibrium investments increase with their own target valuations, because a higher valuation for themselves means a higher attractiveness. Interestingly, the attacker’s equilibrium investment is negatively correlated with the defender’s target valuations, since a higher defender’s valuation would make it more difficult for the attacker to successfully attack the target. By contrast, the defender’s equilibrium investment is positively correlated with the attacker’s target valuations, as a higher attacker’s valuations would increase the urgency for the defender to protect the target. To show the utility of the new model, we compare the results of this model and the model in which the defender assumes that only a single target will be attacked when there could actually be multiple targets attacked. Our results show that the defender will suffer higher expected losses if she assumes that the attacker will attack only one target. The analysis of the attacker’s and the defender’s budget constraints show that (a) the higher the budget the defender has, the less likely it is that her most valuable target will be attacked; (b) a higher proportion of defense resources should be allocated to the most valuable target if the defender’s budget is low; and (c) the attacker is less concentrated on attacking the most valuable target and spreads the resources to attack more targets as his budget increases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-8490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-8504</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/deca.2017.0346</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Budget ; budget constraint ; Budgets ; Economic aspects ; Equilibrium ; Game theory ; Karush–Kuhn–Tucker condition ; sequential game ; simultaneous game ; subgame perfect Nash equilibrium ; Terrorism ; terrorism and counter terrorism ; Terrorists ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>Decision analysis, 2017-06, Vol.14 (2), p.87-107</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Jun 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9b94e41dcc3fa6f4c67b3112afd2db26c7d20c2e10b0f736ba1fb171b05776503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9b94e41dcc3fa6f4c67b3112afd2db26c7d20c2e10b0f736ba1fb171b05776503</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4830-6570</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/deca.2017.0346$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3691,27923,27924,62615</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guan, Peiqiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Meilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hora, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling a Multitarget Attacker–Defender Game with Budget Constraints</title><title>Decision analysis</title><description>Though the choices of terrorists’ attack targets are vast, their resources are limited. In this paper, a game-theoretical model is proposed to study both the defender’s (government) and the attacker’s (terrorist) expenditures among multiple targets under budget constraints to guide investment in defense. We study how the defender’s and the attacker’s equilibrium allocations depend on the budget constraints, target valuations, cost effectiveness of their investments, and inherent defense levels of targets in both sequential-move and simultaneous-move games. The equilibrium solutions are provided using the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions. At the subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium, the defender’s total marginal effects are the same among targets. Moreover, the defender’s total marginal effects can be decomposed into direct and indirect effects. We also use the multiple-infrastructure and multiple-urban-area data sets to demonstrate the model results. The regression analysis shows that both the attacker’s and the defender’s equilibrium investments increase with their own target valuations, because a higher valuation for themselves means a higher attractiveness. Interestingly, the attacker’s equilibrium investment is negatively correlated with the defender’s target valuations, since a higher defender’s valuation would make it more difficult for the attacker to successfully attack the target. By contrast, the defender’s equilibrium investment is positively correlated with the attacker’s target valuations, as a higher attacker’s valuations would increase the urgency for the defender to protect the target. To show the utility of the new model, we compare the results of this model and the model in which the defender assumes that only a single target will be attacked when there could actually be multiple targets attacked. Our results show that the defender will suffer higher expected losses if she assumes that the attacker will attack only one target. The analysis of the attacker’s and the defender’s budget constraints show that (a) the higher the budget the defender has, the less likely it is that her most valuable target will be attacked; (b) a higher proportion of defense resources should be allocated to the most valuable target if the defender’s budget is low; and (c) the attacker is less concentrated on attacking the most valuable target and spreads the resources to attack more targets as his budget increases.</description><subject>Budget</subject><subject>budget constraint</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Karush–Kuhn–Tucker condition</subject><subject>sequential game</subject><subject>simultaneous game</subject><subject>subgame perfect Nash equilibrium</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>terrorism and counter terrorism</subject><subject>Terrorists</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>1545-8490</issn><issn>1545-8504</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0kFr2zAUB3BTNmjX9dqzYbDTnEmyLNnHNO3SQsIu21nI0pOj1JZbSabtrd9h33CfZDbt6AKGIZCE-D3pCf5Jco7RApOSf9Wg5IIgzBcop-woOcEFLbKyQPTd3z2t0HHyIYQ9QiSvGD5J1tteQ2tdk8p0O7TRRukbiOkyRqluwf9-_nUJBpwGn65lB-mDjbv0YtATWvUuRC-ti-Fj8t7INsDZ63qa_Px29WN1nW2-r29Wy02mCkpiVtUVBYq1UrmRzFDFeJ1jTKTRRNeEKa4JUgQwqpHhOaslNjXmuEYF56xA-Wny6eXeO9_fDxCi2PeDd-OTgrCRMMJK_qYa2YKwzvRjm6qzQYklrXjJEGHVqLIZ1YADL9vegbHj8YFfzPhxaOismi34fFAwmgiPsZFDCOIQfvkH1kOwDsI4BdvsYnjxc40o34fgwYg7bzvpnwRGYsqCmLIgpiyIKQtvP52a9l34n_8DraqzzQ</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Guan, Peiqiu</creator><creator>He, Meilin</creator><creator>Zhuang, Jun</creator><creator>Hora, Stephen C</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4830-6570</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Modeling a Multitarget Attacker–Defender Game with Budget Constraints</title><author>Guan, Peiqiu ; He, Meilin ; Zhuang, Jun ; Hora, Stephen C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9b94e41dcc3fa6f4c67b3112afd2db26c7d20c2e10b0f736ba1fb171b05776503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Budget</topic><topic>budget constraint</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Karush–Kuhn–Tucker condition</topic><topic>sequential game</topic><topic>simultaneous game</topic><topic>subgame perfect Nash equilibrium</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>terrorism and counter terrorism</topic><topic>Terrorists</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guan, Peiqiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Meilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hora, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><jtitle>Decision analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guan, Peiqiu</au><au>He, Meilin</au><au>Zhuang, Jun</au><au>Hora, Stephen C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling a Multitarget Attacker–Defender Game with Budget Constraints</atitle><jtitle>Decision analysis</jtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>87-107</pages><issn>1545-8490</issn><eissn>1545-8504</eissn><abstract>Though the choices of terrorists’ attack targets are vast, their resources are limited. In this paper, a game-theoretical model is proposed to study both the defender’s (government) and the attacker’s (terrorist) expenditures among multiple targets under budget constraints to guide investment in defense. We study how the defender’s and the attacker’s equilibrium allocations depend on the budget constraints, target valuations, cost effectiveness of their investments, and inherent defense levels of targets in both sequential-move and simultaneous-move games. The equilibrium solutions are provided using the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions. At the subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium, the defender’s total marginal effects are the same among targets. Moreover, the defender’s total marginal effects can be decomposed into direct and indirect effects. We also use the multiple-infrastructure and multiple-urban-area data sets to demonstrate the model results. The regression analysis shows that both the attacker’s and the defender’s equilibrium investments increase with their own target valuations, because a higher valuation for themselves means a higher attractiveness. Interestingly, the attacker’s equilibrium investment is negatively correlated with the defender’s target valuations, since a higher defender’s valuation would make it more difficult for the attacker to successfully attack the target. By contrast, the defender’s equilibrium investment is positively correlated with the attacker’s target valuations, as a higher attacker’s valuations would increase the urgency for the defender to protect the target. To show the utility of the new model, we compare the results of this model and the model in which the defender assumes that only a single target will be attacked when there could actually be multiple targets attacked. Our results show that the defender will suffer higher expected losses if she assumes that the attacker will attack only one target. The analysis of the attacker’s and the defender’s budget constraints show that (a) the higher the budget the defender has, the less likely it is that her most valuable target will be attacked; (b) a higher proportion of defense resources should be allocated to the most valuable target if the defender’s budget is low; and (c) the attacker is less concentrated on attacking the most valuable target and spreads the resources to attack more targets as his budget increases.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/deca.2017.0346</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4830-6570</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1545-8490
ispartof Decision analysis, 2017-06, Vol.14 (2), p.87-107
issn 1545-8490
1545-8504
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_incontextgauss__A497860269
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Informs
subjects Budget
budget constraint
Budgets
Economic aspects
Equilibrium
Game theory
Karush–Kuhn–Tucker condition
sequential game
simultaneous game
subgame perfect Nash equilibrium
Terrorism
terrorism and counter terrorism
Terrorists
Valuation
title Modeling a Multitarget Attacker–Defender Game with Budget Constraints
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A48%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20a%20Multitarget%20Attacker%E2%80%93Defender%20Game%20with%20Budget%20Constraints&rft.jtitle=Decision%20analysis&rft.au=Guan,%20Peiqiu&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=87-107&rft.issn=1545-8490&rft.eissn=1545-8504&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/deca.2017.0346&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA497860269%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9b94e41dcc3fa6f4c67b3112afd2db26c7d20c2e10b0f736ba1fb171b05776503%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2677662687&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A497860269&rfr_iscdi=true