Loading…
Institutional Changes in Hospital Nursing
Throughout the 1980s, the efficiency of the healthcare delivery system in the US appeared to be threatened by recurrent shortages of registered nurses (RN). Concerns over these recurrent shortages led many economists and healthcare specialists to explore the dynamics of the nursing labor market usin...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of economic issues 1995-03, Vol.29 (1), p.67-82 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f1963822cfd54165c40a5ce04267c55c03d6096a171ffd7822988214c55304713 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f1963822cfd54165c40a5ce04267c55c03d6096a171ffd7822988214c55304713 |
container_end_page | 82 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 67 |
container_title | Journal of economic issues |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Krall, Lisi Prus, Mark J. |
description | Throughout the 1980s, the efficiency of the healthcare delivery system in the US appeared to be threatened by recurrent shortages of registered nurses (RN). Concerns over these recurrent shortages led many economists and healthcare specialists to explore the dynamics of the nursing labor market using neoclassical labor market analysis. Noting that wages seemed to be depressed and slow to respond to excess demand in the nursing labor market, neoclassical analysts suggested that hospitals were exercising monopsonistic power (Yett, 1970). A discussion is presented that agrees with this monopsonistic explanation for the increased utilization of RNs. In general, neoclassical explanations fail to recognize the significance of institutional changes in the organization of the hospital workplace and historical changes in the nature of medical care delivery. Specifically, the discussion argues that the increased utilization of RNs relative to LPNs and aides resulted primarily from: 1. changes in the internal organization of nursing services, 2. cost containment pressures, and 3. advances in medical technology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00213624.1995.11505641 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A16791197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A16791197</galeid><jstor_id>4226917</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A16791197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f1963822cfd54165c40a5ce04267c55c03d6096a171ffd7822988214c55304713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFrGzEQhUVpoG6Sf1CKaU-BrjujlbSrozFNEwjJJYXchNBKrsxaciWZkn8fLdv0lBDmMDDzvTcDj5DPCCuEHr4DUGwFZSuUkq8QOXDB8B1ZoGSiaal4eE8WE9RM1AfyMecdAHDG-YJcXIdcfDkWH4Mel5vfOmxtXvqwvIr54Eud3R5T9mF7Rk6cHrM9_9dPya_LH_ebq-bm7uf1Zn3TGMZFaRxK0faUGjdwhoIbBpobC4yKznBuoB0ESKGxQ-eGrpKy7ymyumuBddieki-z7yHFP0ebi9rFY6rPZUWh71tJKVTo62sQVkPOeyn7Sn2bqa0erfLBxZK02dpgkx5jsM7X8RpFJxFlV_HmBbzWYPfevMSLmTcp5pysU4fk9zo9KgQ1RaOeo1FTNOo5mir8NAt3ucT0X8UoFRIn3_W8nl5Ie_03pnFQRT-OMbmkg_FZtW-ceALM-ZpT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1298558998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional Changes in Hospital Nursing</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>EconLit with Full Text【Remote access available】</source><source>Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost)</source><creator>Krall, Lisi ; Prus, Mark J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Krall, Lisi ; Prus, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><description>Throughout the 1980s, the efficiency of the healthcare delivery system in the US appeared to be threatened by recurrent shortages of registered nurses (RN). Concerns over these recurrent shortages led many economists and healthcare specialists to explore the dynamics of the nursing labor market using neoclassical labor market analysis. Noting that wages seemed to be depressed and slow to respond to excess demand in the nursing labor market, neoclassical analysts suggested that hospitals were exercising monopsonistic power (Yett, 1970). A discussion is presented that agrees with this monopsonistic explanation for the increased utilization of RNs. In general, neoclassical explanations fail to recognize the significance of institutional changes in the organization of the hospital workplace and historical changes in the nature of medical care delivery. Specifically, the discussion argues that the increased utilization of RNs relative to LPNs and aides resulted primarily from: 1. changes in the internal organization of nursing services, 2. cost containment pressures, and 3. advances in medical technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-3624</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1946-326X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00213624.1995.11505641</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECIAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sacramento, Calif: Routledge</publisher><subject>Administration ; Economic policy ; Economic theory ; Employment ; Health care delivery ; Hospital administration ; Hospital utilization rate ; Hospitals ; Labor market ; Monopsony ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing education ; Organizational change ; Practice ; Primary health care ; Primary nursing care ; Registered nurses ; Relative wages ; Supply & demand</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic issues, 1995-03, Vol.29 (1), p.67-82</ispartof><rights>1995 by Journal of Economic Issues-Association for Evolutionary Economics. 1995</rights><rights>Copyright 1995 Journal of Economic Issues-Association for Evolutionary Economics</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1995 Association for Evolutionary Economics</rights><rights>Copyright Association for Evolutionary Economics Mar 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f1963822cfd54165c40a5ce04267c55c03d6096a171ffd7822988214c55304713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f1963822cfd54165c40a5ce04267c55c03d6096a171ffd7822988214c55304713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4226917$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4226917$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27900,27901,58212,58445</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krall, Lisi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prus, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional Changes in Hospital Nursing</title><title>Journal of economic issues</title><description>Throughout the 1980s, the efficiency of the healthcare delivery system in the US appeared to be threatened by recurrent shortages of registered nurses (RN). Concerns over these recurrent shortages led many economists and healthcare specialists to explore the dynamics of the nursing labor market using neoclassical labor market analysis. Noting that wages seemed to be depressed and slow to respond to excess demand in the nursing labor market, neoclassical analysts suggested that hospitals were exercising monopsonistic power (Yett, 1970). A discussion is presented that agrees with this monopsonistic explanation for the increased utilization of RNs. In general, neoclassical explanations fail to recognize the significance of institutional changes in the organization of the hospital workplace and historical changes in the nature of medical care delivery. Specifically, the discussion argues that the increased utilization of RNs relative to LPNs and aides resulted primarily from: 1. changes in the internal organization of nursing services, 2. cost containment pressures, and 3. advances in medical technology.</description><subject>Administration</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Hospital administration</subject><subject>Hospital utilization rate</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Monopsony</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Primary nursing care</subject><subject>Registered nurses</subject><subject>Relative wages</subject><subject>Supply & demand</subject><issn>0021-3624</issn><issn>1946-326X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFrGzEQhUVpoG6Sf1CKaU-BrjujlbSrozFNEwjJJYXchNBKrsxaciWZkn8fLdv0lBDmMDDzvTcDj5DPCCuEHr4DUGwFZSuUkq8QOXDB8B1ZoGSiaal4eE8WE9RM1AfyMecdAHDG-YJcXIdcfDkWH4Mel5vfOmxtXvqwvIr54Eud3R5T9mF7Rk6cHrM9_9dPya_LH_ebq-bm7uf1Zn3TGMZFaRxK0faUGjdwhoIbBpobC4yKznBuoB0ESKGxQ-eGrpKy7ymyumuBddieki-z7yHFP0ebi9rFY6rPZUWh71tJKVTo62sQVkPOeyn7Sn2bqa0erfLBxZK02dpgkx5jsM7X8RpFJxFlV_HmBbzWYPfevMSLmTcp5pysU4fk9zo9KgQ1RaOeo1FTNOo5mir8NAt3ucT0X8UoFRIn3_W8nl5Ie_03pnFQRT-OMbmkg_FZtW-ceALM-ZpT</recordid><startdate>19950301</startdate><enddate>19950301</enddate><creator>Krall, Lisi</creator><creator>Prus, Mark J.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Department of Economics, University of Tennessee</general><general>Association for Evolutionary Economics</general><general>Dept. of Economics, California State University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>AIATT</scope><scope>HDMVH</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>JWXEY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMFND</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PMKZF</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVKVW</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~P4</scope><scope>~P5</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950301</creationdate><title>Institutional Changes in Hospital Nursing</title><author>Krall, Lisi ; Prus, Mark J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f1963822cfd54165c40a5ce04267c55c03d6096a171ffd7822988214c55304713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Administration</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Hospital administration</topic><topic>Hospital utilization rate</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Monopsony</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Primary nursing care</topic><topic>Registered nurses</topic><topic>Relative wages</topic><topic>Supply & demand</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krall, Lisi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prus, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 5 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 15</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 39</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>ProQuest One History</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Digital Collections</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals Collection</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 5</collection><collection>PAO ProQuest</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krall, Lisi</au><au>Prus, Mark J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional Changes in Hospital Nursing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic issues</jtitle><date>1995-03-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>67-82</pages><issn>0021-3624</issn><eissn>1946-326X</eissn><coden>JECIAR</coden><abstract>Throughout the 1980s, the efficiency of the healthcare delivery system in the US appeared to be threatened by recurrent shortages of registered nurses (RN). Concerns over these recurrent shortages led many economists and healthcare specialists to explore the dynamics of the nursing labor market using neoclassical labor market analysis. Noting that wages seemed to be depressed and slow to respond to excess demand in the nursing labor market, neoclassical analysts suggested that hospitals were exercising monopsonistic power (Yett, 1970). A discussion is presented that agrees with this monopsonistic explanation for the increased utilization of RNs. In general, neoclassical explanations fail to recognize the significance of institutional changes in the organization of the hospital workplace and historical changes in the nature of medical care delivery. Specifically, the discussion argues that the increased utilization of RNs relative to LPNs and aides resulted primarily from: 1. changes in the internal organization of nursing services, 2. cost containment pressures, and 3. advances in medical technology.</abstract><cop>Sacramento, Calif</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00213624.1995.11505641</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-3624 |
ispartof | Journal of economic issues, 1995-03, Vol.29 (1), p.67-82 |
issn | 0021-3624 1946-326X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A16791197 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; EconLit with Full Text【Remote access available】; Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost) |
subjects | Administration Economic policy Economic theory Employment Health care delivery Hospital administration Hospital utilization rate Hospitals Labor market Monopsony Nurses Nursing Nursing education Organizational change Practice Primary health care Primary nursing care Registered nurses Relative wages Supply & demand |
title | Institutional Changes in Hospital Nursing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T09%3A55%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20Changes%20in%20Hospital%20Nursing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20issues&rft.au=Krall,%20Lisi&rft.date=1995-03-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=67-82&rft.issn=0021-3624&rft.eissn=1946-326X&rft.coden=JECIAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00213624.1995.11505641&rft_dat=%3Cgale_jstor%3EA16791197%3C/gale_jstor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f1963822cfd54165c40a5ce04267c55c03d6096a171ffd7822988214c55304713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1298558998&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A16791197&rft_jstor_id=4226917&rfr_iscdi=true |