Reporting bias and other biases affecting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a methodological commentary

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses often occupy the top of the hierarchy of evidence in support of evidence-based clinical practice. These studies commonly inform the formulation of clinical guidelines. Bias can intrude at several levels during the conduct of systematic reviews. The effect these v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 2006, Vol.6 (5), p.603
Main Authors: Sinha, Mukesh K, Montori, Victor M
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Evidence-based medicine
Management
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Meta-analysis
Methods
Quality management
Research bias
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Systematic reviews and meta-analyses often occupy the top of the hierarchy of evidence in support of evidence-based clinical practice. These studies commonly inform the formulation of clinical guidelines. Bias can intrude at several levels during the conduct of systematic reviews. The effect these various biases, in particular reporting bias, have on pooled estimates and review inferences are potentially significant. In this review, we describe several forms of selection and reporting biases that may occur during the conduct of a systematic review, how these biases might affect a review and what steps could help minimize their influence on review inferences. Specifically, we support calls for prospective international trial registration and open access to trial protocols as two potential solutions that may improve the methodological quality of systematic reviews and the validity of their results.
ISSN:1473-7167
DOI:10.1586/14737167.6.5.603