Class, Race, and the Discourse of "College for All." A Response to "Schooling for Democracy"

We critique the "college for all" discourse by unveiling its relationship to the politics of education, the broader economic and political contexts, and the class and race structures embedded in society and schooling, including higher education. We analyze the current and future labor mark...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Democracy & education 2011-03, Vol.19 (1)
Main Authors: Glass, Ronald David, Nygreen, Kysa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Access to Education
College Attendance
Criticism
Cultural Differences
Debt (Financial)
Democracy
Education and state
Education, Higher
Educational aspects
Educational Change
English (Second Language)
Equal Education
Federal Legislation
Higher Education
Higher education and state
Ideology
Labor Force
Laws, regulations and rules
Low Income
Mathematics Skills
Paying for College
Politics of Education
Race
Science Education
Second Language Learning
Social aspects
Social Class
United States
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We critique the "college for all" discourse by unveiling its relationship to the politics of education, the broader economic and political contexts, and the class and race structures embedded in society and schooling, including higher education. We analyze the current and future labor markets to demonstrate the ways that the "college for all" discourse overstates the need for math and science knowledge and skills within the workforce, and we analyze the debt burdens associated with college attendance and completion to demonstrate that the promised benefits of "college for all" are often illusory for low-income, racially, culturally, and linguistically diverse students. Thus, we argue that "college for all"--just like "no child left behind" and the "race to the top"--functions as an ideological velvet to soften education policy talk, talk that actually carries big sticks that punish the very students proclaimed to be the beneficiaries of the proposed changes in schooling. The results of schooling practices articulated by the "college for all" discourse are (a) the reinforcement of material barriers to the stated aims of educational access and equity, and (b) the fortification of the class and race status quo. We examine the ways that the transformation of schooling must be linked to the establishment of just social, economic, and political institutions, and to the formation of a citizenry prepared to engage in the struggles for these institutions. (Contains 8 notes.)
ISSN:1085-3545