Loading…
Can robust statistics aid in the analysis of NAA results?
In this work, which is part of a larger effort to develop a software to automate instrumental neutron activation analysis calculations, the elemental concentration in a sample was calculated using either a set containing only the gamma-ray peaks recommended in the literature or a set containing all...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry 2015-12, Vol.306 (3), p.607-610 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-c1dcd14e1b4e386bf00017b765b65a4a29674bb75252d7ed861930274402b72f3 |
container_end_page | 610 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 607 |
container_title | Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry |
container_volume | 306 |
creator | Zahn, Guilherme S. Genezini, Frederico A. Secco, Marcello Ticianelli, Regina B. Figueiredo, Ana M.G. |
description | In this work, which is part of a larger effort to develop a software to automate instrumental neutron activation analysis calculations, the elemental concentration in a sample was calculated using either a set containing only the gamma-ray peaks recommended in the literature or a set containing all peaks identified. The results for each element were reduced using five tools: the usual unweighted and weighted means, plus the limitation of statistical weight, Normalized Residuals and Rajeval. The results were compared to the certified value for each element, allowing for discussion on the performance of each statistical tool and on the choices of peaks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10967-015-4163-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A434716891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A434716891</galeid><sourcerecordid>A434716891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-c1dcd14e1b4e386bf00017b765b65a4a29674bb75252d7ed861930274402b72f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMoWKs_wFv-QGomyeZxkqX4gqIXPYdkN1tTtruSpIf-e1PqWeYwMMw3jw-he6AroFQ9ZKBGKkKhIQIkJ-YCLaDRmjCl6SVaUMYlaRSHa3ST845SarTmC2TWbsJp9odccC6uxFxil7GLPY4TLt8Bu8mNxxwzngf83rY4hXwYS368RVeDG3O4-8tL9PX89Ll-JZuPl7d1uyEdU6aQDvquBxHAi8C19ENdDcor2XjZOOFYPVt4rxrWsF6FXkswnDIlBGVesYEv0eo8d-vGYOM0zCW5rkYf9rGbpzDEWm8FFwqkNlABOANdmnNOYbA_Ke5dOlqg9iTLnmXZKsueZFlTGXZmcu2dtiHZ3XxI9fP8D_QL_b9qew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can robust statistics aid in the analysis of NAA results?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Zahn, Guilherme S. ; Genezini, Frederico A. ; Secco, Marcello ; Ticianelli, Regina B. ; Figueiredo, Ana M.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zahn, Guilherme S. ; Genezini, Frederico A. ; Secco, Marcello ; Ticianelli, Regina B. ; Figueiredo, Ana M.G.</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, which is part of a larger effort to develop a software to automate instrumental neutron activation analysis calculations, the elemental concentration in a sample was calculated using either a set containing only the gamma-ray peaks recommended in the literature or a set containing all peaks identified. The results for each element were reduced using five tools: the usual unweighted and weighted means, plus the limitation of statistical weight, Normalized Residuals and Rajeval. The results were compared to the certified value for each element, allowing for discussion on the performance of each statistical tool and on the choices of peaks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0236-5731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1588-2780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10967-015-4163-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Hadrons ; Heavy Ions ; Inorganic Chemistry ; Nuclear Chemistry ; Nuclear Physics ; Physical Chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry, 2015-12, Vol.306 (3), p.607-610</ispartof><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-c1dcd14e1b4e386bf00017b765b65a4a29674bb75252d7ed861930274402b72f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zahn, Guilherme S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genezini, Frederico A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Secco, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ticianelli, Regina B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Ana M.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Can robust statistics aid in the analysis of NAA results?</title><title>Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry</title><addtitle>J Radioanal Nucl Chem</addtitle><description>In this work, which is part of a larger effort to develop a software to automate instrumental neutron activation analysis calculations, the elemental concentration in a sample was calculated using either a set containing only the gamma-ray peaks recommended in the literature or a set containing all peaks identified. The results for each element were reduced using five tools: the usual unweighted and weighted means, plus the limitation of statistical weight, Normalized Residuals and Rajeval. The results were compared to the certified value for each element, allowing for discussion on the performance of each statistical tool and on the choices of peaks.</description><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Hadrons</subject><subject>Heavy Ions</subject><subject>Inorganic Chemistry</subject><subject>Nuclear Chemistry</subject><subject>Nuclear Physics</subject><subject>Physical Chemistry</subject><issn>0236-5731</issn><issn>1588-2780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMoWKs_wFv-QGomyeZxkqX4gqIXPYdkN1tTtruSpIf-e1PqWeYwMMw3jw-he6AroFQ9ZKBGKkKhIQIkJ-YCLaDRmjCl6SVaUMYlaRSHa3ST845SarTmC2TWbsJp9odccC6uxFxil7GLPY4TLt8Bu8mNxxwzngf83rY4hXwYS368RVeDG3O4-8tL9PX89Ll-JZuPl7d1uyEdU6aQDvquBxHAi8C19ENdDcor2XjZOOFYPVt4rxrWsF6FXkswnDIlBGVesYEv0eo8d-vGYOM0zCW5rkYf9rGbpzDEWm8FFwqkNlABOANdmnNOYbA_Ke5dOlqg9iTLnmXZKsueZFlTGXZmcu2dtiHZ3XxI9fP8D_QL_b9qew</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Zahn, Guilherme S.</creator><creator>Genezini, Frederico A.</creator><creator>Secco, Marcello</creator><creator>Ticianelli, Regina B.</creator><creator>Figueiredo, Ana M.G.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Can robust statistics aid in the analysis of NAA results?</title><author>Zahn, Guilherme S. ; Genezini, Frederico A. ; Secco, Marcello ; Ticianelli, Regina B. ; Figueiredo, Ana M.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-c1dcd14e1b4e386bf00017b765b65a4a29674bb75252d7ed861930274402b72f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Hadrons</topic><topic>Heavy Ions</topic><topic>Inorganic Chemistry</topic><topic>Nuclear Chemistry</topic><topic>Nuclear Physics</topic><topic>Physical Chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zahn, Guilherme S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genezini, Frederico A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Secco, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ticianelli, Regina B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Ana M.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zahn, Guilherme S.</au><au>Genezini, Frederico A.</au><au>Secco, Marcello</au><au>Ticianelli, Regina B.</au><au>Figueiredo, Ana M.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can robust statistics aid in the analysis of NAA results?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry</jtitle><stitle>J Radioanal Nucl Chem</stitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>306</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>610</epage><pages>607-610</pages><issn>0236-5731</issn><eissn>1588-2780</eissn><abstract>In this work, which is part of a larger effort to develop a software to automate instrumental neutron activation analysis calculations, the elemental concentration in a sample was calculated using either a set containing only the gamma-ray peaks recommended in the literature or a set containing all peaks identified. The results for each element were reduced using five tools: the usual unweighted and weighted means, plus the limitation of statistical weight, Normalized Residuals and Rajeval. The results were compared to the certified value for each element, allowing for discussion on the performance of each statistical tool and on the choices of peaks.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10967-015-4163-9</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0236-5731 |
ispartof | Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry, 2015-12, Vol.306 (3), p.607-610 |
issn | 0236-5731 1588-2780 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A434716891 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Diagnostic Radiology Hadrons Heavy Ions Inorganic Chemistry Nuclear Chemistry Nuclear Physics Physical Chemistry |
title | Can robust statistics aid in the analysis of NAA results? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A20%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20robust%20statistics%20aid%20in%20the%20analysis%20of%20NAA%20results?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radioanalytical%20and%20nuclear%20chemistry&rft.au=Zahn,%20Guilherme%20S.&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=306&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=610&rft.pages=607-610&rft.issn=0236-5731&rft.eissn=1588-2780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10967-015-4163-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA434716891%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-c1dcd14e1b4e386bf00017b765b65a4a29674bb75252d7ed861930274402b72f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A434716891&rfr_iscdi=true |