Prediction of soil distribution on two soilscapes in land type Dc17 east of Bloemfontein, South Africa

The predictive nature of digital soil mapping makes it a labour- and cost-effective way of facilitating soil surveys. A digital elevation model was used to generate terrain attributes that can be used to infer the distribution of soil associations relative to the topography. Two study areas--Gladsto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:South African Journal of Science 2013-11, Vol.109 (11-12), p.5-5
Main Authors: Zerizghy, Mussie G, Le Roux, Pieter, Hensley, Malcolm, van Rensburg, Leon D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
discriminant analysis
Gladstone
Methods
Potsane
predictive soil mapping
soil survey
Soil surveys
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The predictive nature of digital soil mapping makes it a labour- and cost-effective way of facilitating soil surveys. A digital elevation model was used to generate terrain attributes that can be used to infer the distribution of soil associations relative to the topography. Two study areas--Gladstone and Potsane in the Free State Province of South Africa were considered. Slope, aspect, contour and plan curvature, topographic wetness index and topographic morphological unit were used to develop a model for predicting soil associations. Discriminant analysis was employed to develop the model. The model was trained on data obtained from Gladstone and validated on data from Gladstone and Potsane. Predicting soil form was unsatisfactory. Prediction done on soil associations, with soils grouped as deep, shallow and valley-bottom soils (criteria closely related to the suitability for in-field rainwater harvesting), achieved acceptable improvement in prediction accuracy. For Gladstone, when analysis was done using equal prior probability, accuracy percentages of 56.9%, 51.5% and 58.3% were found for calibration, cross-validation and areas suited to in-field rainwater harvesting, respectively. With prior probability set in accordance to sample frequency, the accuracy percentages were improved to 83.1%, 80.0% and 94.6%, respectively. In Potsane, the prediction accuracy percentage was low (38.23%) with equal prior probability but markedly improved (67.65%) when prior probability was similar to sample frequency. These results support the validity of the statement that the predictive nature of digital soil mapping makes it a labour- and cost-effective way of facilitating soil surveys. KEYWORDS: predictive soil mapping; soil survey; discriminant analysis; Gladstone; Potsane
ISSN:0038-2353
1996-7489
DOI:10.1590/sajs.2013/20120021