Loading…
Evaluation methodology for the RD project portfolio by using the risk adjusted net present value--one case study in the petrochemical industry/Metodologia de avaliacao do portfolio de projetos de PD pelo valor presente ajustado ao risco--um estudo de caso na industria petroquimica
Nowadays dedicated attention is devoted to intangible evaluation aspects, especially in intensive technological sectors, which are characterized by expressive R&D resources allocation and showing high uncertainties in the project development. The R&D projects can present diverse inovativenes...
Saved in:
Published in: | Revista de Gestão e Projetos 2015-05, p.1 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Revista de Gestão e Projetos |
container_volume | |
creator | Garcez, Marcos Paixao Maccari, Emerson Antonio |
description | Nowadays dedicated attention is devoted to intangible evaluation aspects, especially in intensive technological sectors, which are characterized by expressive R&D resources allocation and showing high uncertainties in the project development. The R&D projects can present diverse inovativeness degrees, each one with different projects development terms, technological intensities and complexities, and related uncertainties degrees. So, the current research and practices are concentrated in the adjustment of the traditional evaluation methodologies for the decision making process related to the portfolio management in those sectors, mainly in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and chemical industries. In this way, the literature presents some uncertainties factors, like the project complexity, the life cycle stage of the technology, the existence of internal knowledge and competencies regarding the technology, the risks involved and the project development terms. The study is based in one in-depth literature review in the technology management, financial methodologies and decision making theoretical streams, and evolves for one field case study carried out in one big petrochemical Brazilian company, which allocates expressive amounts of investments in R&D and uses specific methodology for evaluating the portfolio of projects management. So, the study is organized in three sections: in the first, it aims to verify in the literature the existent methodologies for the project portfolio management. In the second, are presented the evaluation methodologies for innovation projects. Finally, in the third section, one empirical case study is performed in the Brazilian petrochemical leader, by using in-depth interviews and secondary data analyses, aiming to verify in the business practice the methodologies are being used for portfolio management and R&D evaluation, and its observed limitations. Conclusions search similarities in the evaluation methodologies applied to the project portfolio management context, trying to establish recommendations for the company under investigation. As main findings, it is concluded that the traditional evaluation methodologies do not fit very well when applied to R&D projects, which show high associated uncertainties, and need to be adjusted for use. This adjustment is made through specific uncertainty aspects--the risk drivers, which will influence the conditional probabilities of technical and market success, leading to one more robus |
doi_str_mv | 10.5585/gep.v6i2.351 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A451530730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A451530730</galeid><sourcerecordid>A451530730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A4515307303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj09PwzAMxQsCiQl248LNX6Bd_5BtHBEMcUFCiDsKidtmZHFJ0kn99rhlSLuSSyzb772fk-S6yDMh1mLRYJftl6bMKlGcJrOyrJZpfrcqz47qi2Qewjbnt1yLoipmJzebvbS9jIYc7DC2pMlSM0BNHmKL8PYInactqggd-ViTNQSfA_TBuGba8CZ8gdTbPkTU4JAXPQZ0EUZnTFNyCEoGhBB7PYBxk6zD6Em1uDNKWm5q1vth8YLxF8FI0AiSPYxUkkDTEQBPJqpIYaxfGRItjYGMfYhn8cgkWchyplSUpv0OcMSYLBiKwMm_cE6coL57M0JdJee1tAHnh_8yyZ427w_PaSMtfhhXU_RMpqQeb-Aja8P9-1tRiCpfVXn1b8EP4OGYvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation methodology for the RD project portfolio by using the risk adjusted net present value--one case study in the petrochemical industry/Metodologia de avaliacao do portfolio de projetos de PD pelo valor presente ajustado ao risco--um estudo de caso na industria petroquimica</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Garcez, Marcos Paixao ; Maccari, Emerson Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcez, Marcos Paixao ; Maccari, Emerson Antonio</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Nowadays dedicated attention is devoted to intangible evaluation aspects, especially in intensive technological sectors, which are characterized by expressive R&D resources allocation and showing high uncertainties in the project development. The R&D projects can present diverse inovativeness degrees, each one with different projects development terms, technological intensities and complexities, and related uncertainties degrees. So, the current research and practices are concentrated in the adjustment of the traditional evaluation methodologies for the decision making process related to the portfolio management in those sectors, mainly in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and chemical industries. In this way, the literature presents some uncertainties factors, like the project complexity, the life cycle stage of the technology, the existence of internal knowledge and competencies regarding the technology, the risks involved and the project development terms. The study is based in one in-depth literature review in the technology management, financial methodologies and decision making theoretical streams, and evolves for one field case study carried out in one big petrochemical Brazilian company, which allocates expressive amounts of investments in R&D and uses specific methodology for evaluating the portfolio of projects management. So, the study is organized in three sections: in the first, it aims to verify in the literature the existent methodologies for the project portfolio management. In the second, are presented the evaluation methodologies for innovation projects. Finally, in the third section, one empirical case study is performed in the Brazilian petrochemical leader, by using in-depth interviews and secondary data analyses, aiming to verify in the business practice the methodologies are being used for portfolio management and R&D evaluation, and its observed limitations. Conclusions search similarities in the evaluation methodologies applied to the project portfolio management context, trying to establish recommendations for the company under investigation. As main findings, it is concluded that the traditional evaluation methodologies do not fit very well when applied to R&D projects, which show high associated uncertainties, and need to be adjusted for use. This adjustment is made through specific uncertainty aspects--the risk drivers, which will influence the conditional probabilities of technical and market success, leading to one more robust aggregated indicator, the adjusted net present value. Beyond the use of this improved methodology, it seems to be worth value grouping the projects in different innovation categories, as preconized by the Strategic Buckets methodology, in order of comparing projects only pertaining for the same category, enabling so the adherence of the technology strategy to the business strategy. Keywords: R&D project evaluation; Project Portfolio Management; Innovation Management; Muita atencao tem sido reservada a avaliacao de intangiveis, em especial em setores de alto conteudo tecnologico, e, por conseguinte de elevadas alocacoes em projetos de P&D, que por sua vez embutem alta incerteza. Os projetos de P&D apresentam diferentes graus de inovacao, embutindo distintos prazos de maturacao, conteudo tecnologico e niveis de incerteza. Novas pesquisas e praticas tem se concentrado em adaptar as metodologias tradicionais de avaliacao para a tomada de decisao em gestao de portfolio e selecao de projetos nestes setores, especialmente o farmaceutico, biotecnologico e quimico. Nesse sentido, a literatura contempla varios fatores de incerteza, tais como a complexidade da inovacao, o estagio no ciclo de vida da tecnologia, grau de competencias e dominio interno da tecnologia, risco e prazo de maturacao. Realiza-se um aprofundamento nos campos de gestao tecnologica, financas e analise da decisao e compara-se a teoria com os achados da pratica empresarial em uma empresa de grande porte no setor petroquimico, com elevada alocacao em P&D e uso de metodologia especifica de gestao do portfolio de projetos. Constata-se que as metodologias tradicionais de avaliacao nao respondem bem as elevadas incertezas dos projetos de inovacao e necessitam ser ajustadas para uso, por meio de componentes de incerteza especificos--os direcionadores de risco, que afetam as probabilidades de sucesso tecnico e comercial, e com isso se obtem um indicador mais robusto, o valor presente ajustado ao risco. Tambem parece prudente agrupar os projetos em diferentes categorias, selecionando os mais indicados segundo as metricas de avaliacao de cada natureza, garantindo assim o alinhamento da estrategia tecnologica a corporativa. Palavras-chave: Avaliacao de projetos de P Gestao do Portfolio de Projetos; Gestao da Inovacao; Valor Presente ajustado ao Risco; Gestao de Projetos.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2236-0972</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2236-0972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5585/gep.v6i2.351</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Universidade Nove de Julho</publisher><ispartof>Revista de Gestão e Projetos, 2015-05, p.1</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Universidade Nove de Julho</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcez, Marcos Paixao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maccari, Emerson Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation methodology for the RD project portfolio by using the risk adjusted net present value--one case study in the petrochemical industry/Metodologia de avaliacao do portfolio de projetos de PD pelo valor presente ajustado ao risco--um estudo de caso na industria petroquimica</title><title>Revista de Gestão e Projetos</title><description><![CDATA[Nowadays dedicated attention is devoted to intangible evaluation aspects, especially in intensive technological sectors, which are characterized by expressive R&D resources allocation and showing high uncertainties in the project development. The R&D projects can present diverse inovativeness degrees, each one with different projects development terms, technological intensities and complexities, and related uncertainties degrees. So, the current research and practices are concentrated in the adjustment of the traditional evaluation methodologies for the decision making process related to the portfolio management in those sectors, mainly in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and chemical industries. In this way, the literature presents some uncertainties factors, like the project complexity, the life cycle stage of the technology, the existence of internal knowledge and competencies regarding the technology, the risks involved and the project development terms. The study is based in one in-depth literature review in the technology management, financial methodologies and decision making theoretical streams, and evolves for one field case study carried out in one big petrochemical Brazilian company, which allocates expressive amounts of investments in R&D and uses specific methodology for evaluating the portfolio of projects management. So, the study is organized in three sections: in the first, it aims to verify in the literature the existent methodologies for the project portfolio management. In the second, are presented the evaluation methodologies for innovation projects. Finally, in the third section, one empirical case study is performed in the Brazilian petrochemical leader, by using in-depth interviews and secondary data analyses, aiming to verify in the business practice the methodologies are being used for portfolio management and R&D evaluation, and its observed limitations. Conclusions search similarities in the evaluation methodologies applied to the project portfolio management context, trying to establish recommendations for the company under investigation. As main findings, it is concluded that the traditional evaluation methodologies do not fit very well when applied to R&D projects, which show high associated uncertainties, and need to be adjusted for use. This adjustment is made through specific uncertainty aspects--the risk drivers, which will influence the conditional probabilities of technical and market success, leading to one more robust aggregated indicator, the adjusted net present value. Beyond the use of this improved methodology, it seems to be worth value grouping the projects in different innovation categories, as preconized by the Strategic Buckets methodology, in order of comparing projects only pertaining for the same category, enabling so the adherence of the technology strategy to the business strategy. Keywords: R&D project evaluation; Project Portfolio Management; Innovation Management; Muita atencao tem sido reservada a avaliacao de intangiveis, em especial em setores de alto conteudo tecnologico, e, por conseguinte de elevadas alocacoes em projetos de P&D, que por sua vez embutem alta incerteza. Os projetos de P&D apresentam diferentes graus de inovacao, embutindo distintos prazos de maturacao, conteudo tecnologico e niveis de incerteza. Novas pesquisas e praticas tem se concentrado em adaptar as metodologias tradicionais de avaliacao para a tomada de decisao em gestao de portfolio e selecao de projetos nestes setores, especialmente o farmaceutico, biotecnologico e quimico. Nesse sentido, a literatura contempla varios fatores de incerteza, tais como a complexidade da inovacao, o estagio no ciclo de vida da tecnologia, grau de competencias e dominio interno da tecnologia, risco e prazo de maturacao. Realiza-se um aprofundamento nos campos de gestao tecnologica, financas e analise da decisao e compara-se a teoria com os achados da pratica empresarial em uma empresa de grande porte no setor petroquimico, com elevada alocacao em P&D e uso de metodologia especifica de gestao do portfolio de projetos. Constata-se que as metodologias tradicionais de avaliacao nao respondem bem as elevadas incertezas dos projetos de inovacao e necessitam ser ajustadas para uso, por meio de componentes de incerteza especificos--os direcionadores de risco, que afetam as probabilidades de sucesso tecnico e comercial, e com isso se obtem um indicador mais robusto, o valor presente ajustado ao risco. Tambem parece prudente agrupar os projetos em diferentes categorias, selecionando os mais indicados segundo as metricas de avaliacao de cada natureza, garantindo assim o alinhamento da estrategia tecnologica a corporativa. Palavras-chave: Avaliacao de projetos de P Gestao do Portfolio de Projetos; Gestao da Inovacao; Valor Presente ajustado ao Risco; Gestao de Projetos.]]></description><issn>2236-0972</issn><issn>2236-0972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVj09PwzAMxQsCiQl248LNX6Bd_5BtHBEMcUFCiDsKidtmZHFJ0kn99rhlSLuSSyzb772fk-S6yDMh1mLRYJftl6bMKlGcJrOyrJZpfrcqz47qi2Qewjbnt1yLoipmJzebvbS9jIYc7DC2pMlSM0BNHmKL8PYInactqggd-ViTNQSfA_TBuGba8CZ8gdTbPkTU4JAXPQZ0EUZnTFNyCEoGhBB7PYBxk6zD6Em1uDNKWm5q1vth8YLxF8FI0AiSPYxUkkDTEQBPJqpIYaxfGRItjYGMfYhn8cgkWchyplSUpv0OcMSYLBiKwMm_cE6coL57M0JdJee1tAHnh_8yyZ427w_PaSMtfhhXU_RMpqQeb-Aja8P9-1tRiCpfVXn1b8EP4OGYvw</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Garcez, Marcos Paixao</creator><creator>Maccari, Emerson Antonio</creator><general>Universidade Nove de Julho</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Evaluation methodology for the RD project portfolio by using the risk adjusted net present value--one case study in the petrochemical industry/Metodologia de avaliacao do portfolio de projetos de PD pelo valor presente ajustado ao risco--um estudo de caso na industria petroquimica</title><author>Garcez, Marcos Paixao ; Maccari, Emerson Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A4515307303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcez, Marcos Paixao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maccari, Emerson Antonio</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Revista de Gestão e Projetos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcez, Marcos Paixao</au><au>Maccari, Emerson Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation methodology for the RD project portfolio by using the risk adjusted net present value--one case study in the petrochemical industry/Metodologia de avaliacao do portfolio de projetos de PD pelo valor presente ajustado ao risco--um estudo de caso na industria petroquimica</atitle><jtitle>Revista de Gestão e Projetos</jtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>2236-0972</issn><eissn>2236-0972</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Nowadays dedicated attention is devoted to intangible evaluation aspects, especially in intensive technological sectors, which are characterized by expressive R&D resources allocation and showing high uncertainties in the project development. The R&D projects can present diverse inovativeness degrees, each one with different projects development terms, technological intensities and complexities, and related uncertainties degrees. So, the current research and practices are concentrated in the adjustment of the traditional evaluation methodologies for the decision making process related to the portfolio management in those sectors, mainly in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and chemical industries. In this way, the literature presents some uncertainties factors, like the project complexity, the life cycle stage of the technology, the existence of internal knowledge and competencies regarding the technology, the risks involved and the project development terms. The study is based in one in-depth literature review in the technology management, financial methodologies and decision making theoretical streams, and evolves for one field case study carried out in one big petrochemical Brazilian company, which allocates expressive amounts of investments in R&D and uses specific methodology for evaluating the portfolio of projects management. So, the study is organized in three sections: in the first, it aims to verify in the literature the existent methodologies for the project portfolio management. In the second, are presented the evaluation methodologies for innovation projects. Finally, in the third section, one empirical case study is performed in the Brazilian petrochemical leader, by using in-depth interviews and secondary data analyses, aiming to verify in the business practice the methodologies are being used for portfolio management and R&D evaluation, and its observed limitations. Conclusions search similarities in the evaluation methodologies applied to the project portfolio management context, trying to establish recommendations for the company under investigation. As main findings, it is concluded that the traditional evaluation methodologies do not fit very well when applied to R&D projects, which show high associated uncertainties, and need to be adjusted for use. This adjustment is made through specific uncertainty aspects--the risk drivers, which will influence the conditional probabilities of technical and market success, leading to one more robust aggregated indicator, the adjusted net present value. Beyond the use of this improved methodology, it seems to be worth value grouping the projects in different innovation categories, as preconized by the Strategic Buckets methodology, in order of comparing projects only pertaining for the same category, enabling so the adherence of the technology strategy to the business strategy. Keywords: R&D project evaluation; Project Portfolio Management; Innovation Management; Muita atencao tem sido reservada a avaliacao de intangiveis, em especial em setores de alto conteudo tecnologico, e, por conseguinte de elevadas alocacoes em projetos de P&D, que por sua vez embutem alta incerteza. Os projetos de P&D apresentam diferentes graus de inovacao, embutindo distintos prazos de maturacao, conteudo tecnologico e niveis de incerteza. Novas pesquisas e praticas tem se concentrado em adaptar as metodologias tradicionais de avaliacao para a tomada de decisao em gestao de portfolio e selecao de projetos nestes setores, especialmente o farmaceutico, biotecnologico e quimico. Nesse sentido, a literatura contempla varios fatores de incerteza, tais como a complexidade da inovacao, o estagio no ciclo de vida da tecnologia, grau de competencias e dominio interno da tecnologia, risco e prazo de maturacao. Realiza-se um aprofundamento nos campos de gestao tecnologica, financas e analise da decisao e compara-se a teoria com os achados da pratica empresarial em uma empresa de grande porte no setor petroquimico, com elevada alocacao em P&D e uso de metodologia especifica de gestao do portfolio de projetos. Constata-se que as metodologias tradicionais de avaliacao nao respondem bem as elevadas incertezas dos projetos de inovacao e necessitam ser ajustadas para uso, por meio de componentes de incerteza especificos--os direcionadores de risco, que afetam as probabilidades de sucesso tecnico e comercial, e com isso se obtem um indicador mais robusto, o valor presente ajustado ao risco. Tambem parece prudente agrupar os projetos em diferentes categorias, selecionando os mais indicados segundo as metricas de avaliacao de cada natureza, garantindo assim o alinhamento da estrategia tecnologica a corporativa. Palavras-chave: Avaliacao de projetos de P Gestao do Portfolio de Projetos; Gestao da Inovacao; Valor Presente ajustado ao Risco; Gestao de Projetos.]]></abstract><pub>Universidade Nove de Julho</pub><doi>10.5585/gep.v6i2.351</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2236-0972 |
ispartof | Revista de Gestão e Projetos, 2015-05, p.1 |
issn | 2236-0972 2236-0972 |
language | spa |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A451530730 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
title | Evaluation methodology for the RD project portfolio by using the risk adjusted net present value--one case study in the petrochemical industry/Metodologia de avaliacao do portfolio de projetos de PD pelo valor presente ajustado ao risco--um estudo de caso na industria petroquimica |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A17%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20methodology%20for%20the%20RD%20project%20portfolio%20by%20using%20the%20risk%20adjusted%20net%20present%20value--one%20case%20study%20in%20the%20petrochemical%20industry/Metodologia%20de%20avaliacao%20do%20portfolio%20de%20projetos%20de%20PD%20pelo%20valor%20presente%20ajustado%20ao%20risco--um%20estudo%20de%20caso%20na%20industria%20petroquimica&rft.jtitle=Revista%20de%20Gest%C3%A3o%20e%20Projetos&rft.au=Garcez,%20Marcos%20Paixao&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=2236-0972&rft.eissn=2236-0972&rft_id=info:doi/10.5585/gep.v6i2.351&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA451530730%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A4515307303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A451530730&rfr_iscdi=true |