Loading…

Study of non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of Ge.sub.20Se.sub.70Sn.sub.10 chalcogenide glass

The glass transition and non-isothermal crystallization behavior of Ge.sub.20Se.sub.70Sn.sub.10 glass prepared by the melt-quenching technique was investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at continuous different heating rates. The structure and surface morphology of as-prepared and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 2018-03, Vol.131 (3), p.2433
Main Authors: Mahmoud, A. Z, Mohamed, Mansour, Moustafa, S, Abdelraheem, A. M, Abdel-Rahim, M. A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The glass transition and non-isothermal crystallization behavior of Ge.sub.20Se.sub.70Sn.sub.10 glass prepared by the melt-quenching technique was investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at continuous different heating rates. The structure and surface morphology of as-prepared and annealed samples were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy. The as-prepared samples showed the amorphous glassy nature, while the annealed ones are polycrystalline. Furthermore, XRD phase analysis allowed us to find the SnSe.sub.2, GeSe.sub.2, Ge.sub.4Se.sub.9 and Sn.sub.0.5 SeGe.sub.0.5 phases in the annealed samples. According to the value of Avrami index (n), the crystallization process of studied composition has more than one crystal growth mechanism. In addition, the results of DSC showed that the investigated glass has only a single glass transition and double crystallization stages. Furthermore, the activation energy of transition as well as the crystallization has been determined based on different approximation methods. In addition, the experimental DSC data of the first and second crystallization peak were compared with that calculated with the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami and Sestak-Berggren SB(M, N) model. The results revealed that the SB(M, N) model is more suitable for describing the crystallization kinetics of studied glass.
ISSN:1388-6150
DOI:10.1007/s10973-017-6793-3