Loading…
Reliability and Validity of NX-16 3D Body Scanner/ Confiabilidad y Validez del Escaner Corporal 3D NX-16
3D body scanning technology is nowadays widely available and used in various research on body morphology and anatomical structure. The present study investigated the reliability and validity of NX-16 (TC2) 3D body scanner with a method of classical anthropometry. Research was carried out on 31 parti...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of morphology 2016-12, Vol.34 (4), p.1506 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1506 |
container_title | International journal of morphology |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Simenko, Jozef Cuk, Ivan |
description | 3D body scanning technology is nowadays widely available and used in various research on body morphology and anatomical structure. The present study investigated the reliability and validity of NX-16 (TC2) 3D body scanner with a method of classical anthropometry. Research was carried out on 31 participants (17 males and 14 females) with their age 22.1 [+ or -] 4.63 years, their height 177.17 [+ or -] 8.96 cm and their weight 72.36 [+ or -] 13.6 kg. Left (L)--Right (R) upper arm girth, L--R elbow girth, L--R forearm girth, L--R wrist girth, L--R thigh girth, L--R knee girth and L--R calf girth were measured with a flexible and inextensible tape with a 1 mm accuracy, and with the 3D measurement technique. The results show a good agreement between both methods used with paired variables showing significant and very strong correlations with more than 90 % of shared variance; Bland-Altman plot also shows a high agreement; paired sample T-test significance was observed in most cases; no significant differences were observed in measurements of right wrist girth, left thigh girth, left knee girth and in left calf girth. NX-16 3D body scanner thus represents a valid and highly accurate tool for assessing human body dimensions. However, the 3D body scanning and classical anthropometry method cannot be regarded as interchangeable due to the different initial positions of the body in the implementation of measurement protocols. For the direct comparison of 3D scanning and the classical anthropometry method in the future, the same body starting position should be used as is held during the 3D scanning process. KEY WORDS: Morphology; Anthropometry; Circumferences. La tecnologia de escaner del cuerpo en 3D se encuentra ampliamente disponible y se utiliza en diversas investigaciones de la morfologia del cuerpo y las estructuras anatomicas. El presente estudio investigo la fiabilidad y validez del escaner corporal NX-16 (TC2) 3D con un metodo de la antropometria clasica. La investigacion se realizo en 31 participantes (17 hombres y 14 mujeres) con rango etario de 22,1 [+ or -] 4,63 anos, altura de 177,17 [+ or -] 8,96 cm y peso de 72,36 [+ or -] 13,6 kg. Se midieron con una cinta metrica flexible e inextensible con precision de 1 mm, y con la tecnica de medicion 3D la circunferencia del brazo superior, I--D, circunferencia del codo, I--D, circunferencia de antebrazo, I--D, circunferencia de la muneca, I--D, circunferencia del muslo, I--D y circunferencia de rodilla I--D. L |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A535236127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A535236127</galeid><sourcerecordid>A535236127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A5352361273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjE0OgjAUhLvQRPy5w7sACjTQuFTEuHKhxrgzT_qqNbU1hQ2eXlAvYGYxmcl802NBJGIRznkmBmxYVfcoSlIRpQG77chovGij6wbQSjii0bILTsH2FMYZ8BUsnWxgX6K15GeQO6u-jEQJzRehF0gyUFTtiny78U_n0XT052bM-gpNRZOfj9h0XRzyTXhFQ2dtlas9lq0kPXTpLCnd9ouUpwnP4kTwv4E3gGZMFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability and Validity of NX-16 3D Body Scanner/ Confiabilidad y Validez del Escaner Corporal 3D NX-16</title><source>SciELO</source><creator>Simenko, Jozef ; Cuk, Ivan</creator><creatorcontrib>Simenko, Jozef ; Cuk, Ivan</creatorcontrib><description>3D body scanning technology is nowadays widely available and used in various research on body morphology and anatomical structure. The present study investigated the reliability and validity of NX-16 (TC2) 3D body scanner with a method of classical anthropometry. Research was carried out on 31 participants (17 males and 14 females) with their age 22.1 [+ or -] 4.63 years, their height 177.17 [+ or -] 8.96 cm and their weight 72.36 [+ or -] 13.6 kg. Left (L)--Right (R) upper arm girth, L--R elbow girth, L--R forearm girth, L--R wrist girth, L--R thigh girth, L--R knee girth and L--R calf girth were measured with a flexible and inextensible tape with a 1 mm accuracy, and with the 3D measurement technique. The results show a good agreement between both methods used with paired variables showing significant and very strong correlations with more than 90 % of shared variance; Bland-Altman plot also shows a high agreement; paired sample T-test significance was observed in most cases; no significant differences were observed in measurements of right wrist girth, left thigh girth, left knee girth and in left calf girth. NX-16 3D body scanner thus represents a valid and highly accurate tool for assessing human body dimensions. However, the 3D body scanning and classical anthropometry method cannot be regarded as interchangeable due to the different initial positions of the body in the implementation of measurement protocols. For the direct comparison of 3D scanning and the classical anthropometry method in the future, the same body starting position should be used as is held during the 3D scanning process. KEY WORDS: Morphology; Anthropometry; Circumferences. La tecnologia de escaner del cuerpo en 3D se encuentra ampliamente disponible y se utiliza en diversas investigaciones de la morfologia del cuerpo y las estructuras anatomicas. El presente estudio investigo la fiabilidad y validez del escaner corporal NX-16 (TC2) 3D con un metodo de la antropometria clasica. La investigacion se realizo en 31 participantes (17 hombres y 14 mujeres) con rango etario de 22,1 [+ or -] 4,63 anos, altura de 177,17 [+ or -] 8,96 cm y peso de 72,36 [+ or -] 13,6 kg. Se midieron con una cinta metrica flexible e inextensible con precision de 1 mm, y con la tecnica de medicion 3D la circunferencia del brazo superior, I--D, circunferencia del codo, I--D, circunferencia de antebrazo, I--D, circunferencia de la muneca, I--D, circunferencia del muslo, I--D y circunferencia de rodilla I--D. Los resultados mostraron una buena concordancia entre los dos metodos utilizados con variables que presentan correlaciones importantes y significativas, con mas del 90 % de la varianza compartida; Bland-Altman plot mostro importantes correlaciones. No se observaron diferencias significativas en las mediciones de la circunferencia de la muneca derecha, la circunferencia del muslo izquierdo, la circunferencia de la rodilla izquierda y la circunferencia de la pierna izquierda. NX-16 escaner de cuerpo en 3D representa un numero valido y altamente preciso para evaluar las dimensiones del cuerpo humano. El escaneo en 3D del cuerpo y el metodo de la antropometria clasica no pueden ser considerados como intercambiables debido a las diferentes posiciones iniciales del cuerpo en la aplicacion de los protocolos de medicion. Para la comparacion directa de escaneado 3D y el metodo de la antropometria clasica en el futuro, se debera utilizar la misma posicion del cuerpo, que se lleva a cabo al inicio del proceso de digitalizacion en 3D. PALABRAS CLAVE: Morfologia; Antropometria; Circunferencias.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0717-9367</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Universidad de La Frontera, Facultad de Medicina</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Full-body scanners (Passenger screening) ; Optical scanners</subject><ispartof>International journal of morphology, 2016-12, Vol.34 (4), p.1506</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Universidad de La Frontera, Facultad de Medicina</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simenko, Jozef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuk, Ivan</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability and Validity of NX-16 3D Body Scanner/ Confiabilidad y Validez del Escaner Corporal 3D NX-16</title><title>International journal of morphology</title><description>3D body scanning technology is nowadays widely available and used in various research on body morphology and anatomical structure. The present study investigated the reliability and validity of NX-16 (TC2) 3D body scanner with a method of classical anthropometry. Research was carried out on 31 participants (17 males and 14 females) with their age 22.1 [+ or -] 4.63 years, their height 177.17 [+ or -] 8.96 cm and their weight 72.36 [+ or -] 13.6 kg. Left (L)--Right (R) upper arm girth, L--R elbow girth, L--R forearm girth, L--R wrist girth, L--R thigh girth, L--R knee girth and L--R calf girth were measured with a flexible and inextensible tape with a 1 mm accuracy, and with the 3D measurement technique. The results show a good agreement between both methods used with paired variables showing significant and very strong correlations with more than 90 % of shared variance; Bland-Altman plot also shows a high agreement; paired sample T-test significance was observed in most cases; no significant differences were observed in measurements of right wrist girth, left thigh girth, left knee girth and in left calf girth. NX-16 3D body scanner thus represents a valid and highly accurate tool for assessing human body dimensions. However, the 3D body scanning and classical anthropometry method cannot be regarded as interchangeable due to the different initial positions of the body in the implementation of measurement protocols. For the direct comparison of 3D scanning and the classical anthropometry method in the future, the same body starting position should be used as is held during the 3D scanning process. KEY WORDS: Morphology; Anthropometry; Circumferences. La tecnologia de escaner del cuerpo en 3D se encuentra ampliamente disponible y se utiliza en diversas investigaciones de la morfologia del cuerpo y las estructuras anatomicas. El presente estudio investigo la fiabilidad y validez del escaner corporal NX-16 (TC2) 3D con un metodo de la antropometria clasica. La investigacion se realizo en 31 participantes (17 hombres y 14 mujeres) con rango etario de 22,1 [+ or -] 4,63 anos, altura de 177,17 [+ or -] 8,96 cm y peso de 72,36 [+ or -] 13,6 kg. Se midieron con una cinta metrica flexible e inextensible con precision de 1 mm, y con la tecnica de medicion 3D la circunferencia del brazo superior, I--D, circunferencia del codo, I--D, circunferencia de antebrazo, I--D, circunferencia de la muneca, I--D, circunferencia del muslo, I--D y circunferencia de rodilla I--D. Los resultados mostraron una buena concordancia entre los dos metodos utilizados con variables que presentan correlaciones importantes y significativas, con mas del 90 % de la varianza compartida; Bland-Altman plot mostro importantes correlaciones. No se observaron diferencias significativas en las mediciones de la circunferencia de la muneca derecha, la circunferencia del muslo izquierdo, la circunferencia de la rodilla izquierda y la circunferencia de la pierna izquierda. NX-16 escaner de cuerpo en 3D representa un numero valido y altamente preciso para evaluar las dimensiones del cuerpo humano. El escaneo en 3D del cuerpo y el metodo de la antropometria clasica no pueden ser considerados como intercambiables debido a las diferentes posiciones iniciales del cuerpo en la aplicacion de los protocolos de medicion. Para la comparacion directa de escaneado 3D y el metodo de la antropometria clasica en el futuro, se debera utilizar la misma posicion del cuerpo, que se lleva a cabo al inicio del proceso de digitalizacion en 3D. PALABRAS CLAVE: Morfologia; Antropometria; Circunferencias.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Full-body scanners (Passenger screening)</subject><subject>Optical scanners</subject><issn>0717-9367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVjE0OgjAUhLvQRPy5w7sACjTQuFTEuHKhxrgzT_qqNbU1hQ2eXlAvYGYxmcl802NBJGIRznkmBmxYVfcoSlIRpQG77chovGij6wbQSjii0bILTsH2FMYZ8BUsnWxgX6K15GeQO6u-jEQJzRehF0gyUFTtiny78U_n0XT052bM-gpNRZOfj9h0XRzyTXhFQ2dtlas9lq0kPXTpLCnd9ouUpwnP4kTwv4E3gGZMFA</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Simenko, Jozef</creator><creator>Cuk, Ivan</creator><general>Universidad de La Frontera, Facultad de Medicina</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Reliability and Validity of NX-16 3D Body Scanner/ Confiabilidad y Validez del Escaner Corporal 3D NX-16</title><author>Simenko, Jozef ; Cuk, Ivan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A5352361273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Full-body scanners (Passenger screening)</topic><topic>Optical scanners</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simenko, Jozef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuk, Ivan</creatorcontrib><jtitle>International journal of morphology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simenko, Jozef</au><au>Cuk, Ivan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability and Validity of NX-16 3D Body Scanner/ Confiabilidad y Validez del Escaner Corporal 3D NX-16</atitle><jtitle>International journal of morphology</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1506</spage><pages>1506-</pages><issn>0717-9367</issn><abstract>3D body scanning technology is nowadays widely available and used in various research on body morphology and anatomical structure. The present study investigated the reliability and validity of NX-16 (TC2) 3D body scanner with a method of classical anthropometry. Research was carried out on 31 participants (17 males and 14 females) with their age 22.1 [+ or -] 4.63 years, their height 177.17 [+ or -] 8.96 cm and their weight 72.36 [+ or -] 13.6 kg. Left (L)--Right (R) upper arm girth, L--R elbow girth, L--R forearm girth, L--R wrist girth, L--R thigh girth, L--R knee girth and L--R calf girth were measured with a flexible and inextensible tape with a 1 mm accuracy, and with the 3D measurement technique. The results show a good agreement between both methods used with paired variables showing significant and very strong correlations with more than 90 % of shared variance; Bland-Altman plot also shows a high agreement; paired sample T-test significance was observed in most cases; no significant differences were observed in measurements of right wrist girth, left thigh girth, left knee girth and in left calf girth. NX-16 3D body scanner thus represents a valid and highly accurate tool for assessing human body dimensions. However, the 3D body scanning and classical anthropometry method cannot be regarded as interchangeable due to the different initial positions of the body in the implementation of measurement protocols. For the direct comparison of 3D scanning and the classical anthropometry method in the future, the same body starting position should be used as is held during the 3D scanning process. KEY WORDS: Morphology; Anthropometry; Circumferences. La tecnologia de escaner del cuerpo en 3D se encuentra ampliamente disponible y se utiliza en diversas investigaciones de la morfologia del cuerpo y las estructuras anatomicas. El presente estudio investigo la fiabilidad y validez del escaner corporal NX-16 (TC2) 3D con un metodo de la antropometria clasica. La investigacion se realizo en 31 participantes (17 hombres y 14 mujeres) con rango etario de 22,1 [+ or -] 4,63 anos, altura de 177,17 [+ or -] 8,96 cm y peso de 72,36 [+ or -] 13,6 kg. Se midieron con una cinta metrica flexible e inextensible con precision de 1 mm, y con la tecnica de medicion 3D la circunferencia del brazo superior, I--D, circunferencia del codo, I--D, circunferencia de antebrazo, I--D, circunferencia de la muneca, I--D, circunferencia del muslo, I--D y circunferencia de rodilla I--D. Los resultados mostraron una buena concordancia entre los dos metodos utilizados con variables que presentan correlaciones importantes y significativas, con mas del 90 % de la varianza compartida; Bland-Altman plot mostro importantes correlaciones. No se observaron diferencias significativas en las mediciones de la circunferencia de la muneca derecha, la circunferencia del muslo izquierdo, la circunferencia de la rodilla izquierda y la circunferencia de la pierna izquierda. NX-16 escaner de cuerpo en 3D representa un numero valido y altamente preciso para evaluar las dimensiones del cuerpo humano. El escaneo en 3D del cuerpo y el metodo de la antropometria clasica no pueden ser considerados como intercambiables debido a las diferentes posiciones iniciales del cuerpo en la aplicacion de los protocolos de medicion. Para la comparacion directa de escaneado 3D y el metodo de la antropometria clasica en el futuro, se debera utilizar la misma posicion del cuerpo, que se lleva a cabo al inicio del proceso de digitalizacion en 3D. PALABRAS CLAVE: Morfologia; Antropometria; Circunferencias.</abstract><pub>Universidad de La Frontera, Facultad de Medicina</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0717-9367 |
ispartof | International journal of morphology, 2016-12, Vol.34 (4), p.1506 |
issn | 0717-9367 |
language | spa |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A535236127 |
source | SciELO |
subjects | Analysis Full-body scanners (Passenger screening) Optical scanners |
title | Reliability and Validity of NX-16 3D Body Scanner/ Confiabilidad y Validez del Escaner Corporal 3D NX-16 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T16%3A25%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20and%20Validity%20of%20NX-16%203D%20Body%20Scanner/%20Confiabilidad%20y%20Validez%20del%20Escaner%20Corporal%203D%20NX-16&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20morphology&rft.au=Simenko,%20Jozef&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1506&rft.pages=1506-&rft.issn=0717-9367&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA535236127%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A5352361273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A535236127&rfr_iscdi=true |