Pulse wave reflection responses to bench press with and without practical blood flow restriction

• Published in: Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism nutrition, and metabolism, 2019-04, Vol.44 (4), p.341-347
• Main Authors: Tai, Yu Lun, Marshall, Erica M, Glasgow, Alaina, Parks, Jason C, Sensibello, Leslie, Kingsley, J. Derek
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: augmentation index; bandages pour genou; Blood flow; Blood pressure; Cardiovascular diseases; Circulatory system; Energy management; exercice contre résistance; Exercise; Exercise physiology; Health aspects; Heart rate; index d’augmentation; KAATSU; Knee; knee wraps; Medical dressings; Medical research; Mens health; occlusion veineuse; Physiological aspects; pression sanguine; resistance exercise; Risk factors; Strength training; venous occlusion; Weight training
• ISSN: 1715-5312; 1715-5320
• DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0265

Resistance exercise is recommended to increase muscular strength but may also increase pulse wave reflection. The effect of resistance exercise combined with practical blood flow restriction (pBFR) on pulse wave reflection is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in pulse wave reflection characteristics between bench press with pBFR and traditional high-load bench press in resistance-trained men. Sixteen resistance-trained men participated in the study. Pulse wave reflection characteristics were assessed before and after low-load bench press with pBFR (LL-pBFR), traditional high-load bench press (HL), and a control (CON). A repeated-measures ANOVA was used to evaluate differences in pulse wave reflection characteristics among the conditions across time. There were significant (p ≤ 0.05) interactions for heart rate, augmentation index, augmentation index normalized at 75 bpm, augmentation pressure, time–tension index, and wasted left ventricular energy such that they were increased after LL-pBFR and HL compared with rest and CON, with no differences between LL-pBFR and HL. Aortic pulse pressure (p < 0.001) was elevated only after LL-pBFR compared with rest. In addition, there was a significant (p ≤ 0.05) interaction for aortic diastolic blood pressure (BP) such that it was decreased after LL-pBFR compared with rest and CON but not HL. The subendocardial viability ratio and diastolic pressure–time index were significantly different between LL-pBFR and HL compared with rest and CON. There were no significant interactions for brachial systolic or diastolic BP, aortic systolic BP, or time of the reflected wave. In conclusion, acute bench press resistance exercise significantly altered pulse wave reflection characteristics without differences between LL-pBFR and HL.