Loading…

Potential sources of bias in the climate sensitivities of fish otolith biochronologies

Analysis of growth increments in the hard parts of animals (e.g., fish otoliths) can be used to assess how organisms respond to variability in environmental conditions. In this study, mixed-effects models were applied to otolith data simulated for two hypothetical fish populations with assumed biolo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences 2020-09, Vol.77 (9), p.1552-1563
Main Authors: Smoliński, Szymon, Morrongiello, John, van der Sleen, Peter, Black, Bryan A, Campana, Steven E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-95d9ee18a9af6c54282f14375dc7bfa93f2ec741bf95cacaa2e9a7f8d76e94c23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-95d9ee18a9af6c54282f14375dc7bfa93f2ec741bf95cacaa2e9a7f8d76e94c23
container_end_page 1563
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1552
container_title Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences
container_volume 77
creator Smoliński, Szymon
Morrongiello, John
van der Sleen, Peter
Black, Bryan A
Campana, Steven E
description Analysis of growth increments in the hard parts of animals (e.g., fish otoliths) can be used to assess how organisms respond to variability in environmental conditions. In this study, mixed-effects models were applied to otolith data simulated for two hypothetical fish populations with assumed biological parameters and known growth response to environmental variability. Our objective was to assess the sensitivity of environment–growth relationships derived from otolith biochronologies when challenged with a range of realistic ageing errors and sampling regimes. We found that the development of a robust biochronology and the precision of environmental effect estimates can be seriously hampered by insufficient sample size. Moreover, the introduction of even moderate ageing error into the data can cause substantial underestimation of environmental sources of growth variation. This underestimation diminished our capacity to correctly quantify the known environment–growth relationship and more generally will lead to overly conservative conclusions concerning the growth response to environmental change. Careful study design, reduction of ageing errors, and large sample sizes are critical prerequisites if robust inferences are to be made from biochronological data.
doi_str_mv 10.1139/cjfas-2019-0450
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A633624034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A633624034</galeid><sourcerecordid>A633624034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-95d9ee18a9af6c54282f14375dc7bfa93f2ec741bf95cacaa2e9a7f8d76e94c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV0s9rFDEUB_AgFlyrZ6-DnjxMm58zk2Mp_igUlbaKt_A2-7KTZZpsk6zof99sx4OFRZEQAsnn-0LII-QVoyeMCX1qNw5yyynTLZWKPiELxqlqeyXEU7KgPe3aTvHvz8jznDeUMq4YXZBvX2LBUDxMTY67ZDE30TVLD7nxoSkjNnbyt1CwyRiyL_5HnTNyPo9NLHHyZayJaMcUQ5ziup6_IEcOpowvf6_H5Ov7dzfnH9vLzx8uzs8uW6uUKK1WK43IBtDgOqskH7hjUvRqZfulAy0cR9tLtnRaWbAAHDX0blj1HWppuTgmb-a62xTvdpiL2dRXhHql4XIYmOj0IP6uRCcpVXKv2lmtYULjg4slgV1jwARTDOh83T7rhOi4pEJW__qAt1t_Z_5EJwdQHSu89fZg1bePAtUU_FnWsMvZXFxf_Yf99NieztammHNCZ7apfmz6ZRg1-wYyDw1k9g1k9g1UE3xOhGQTZoRkx3-G7gEJwsdW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2436400543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential sources of bias in the climate sensitivities of fish otolith biochronologies</title><source>NRC Research Press</source><creator>Smoliński, Szymon ; Morrongiello, John ; van der Sleen, Peter ; Black, Bryan A ; Campana, Steven E</creator><creatorcontrib>Smoliński, Szymon ; Morrongiello, John ; van der Sleen, Peter ; Black, Bryan A ; Campana, Steven E</creatorcontrib><description>Analysis of growth increments in the hard parts of animals (e.g., fish otoliths) can be used to assess how organisms respond to variability in environmental conditions. In this study, mixed-effects models were applied to otolith data simulated for two hypothetical fish populations with assumed biological parameters and known growth response to environmental variability. Our objective was to assess the sensitivity of environment–growth relationships derived from otolith biochronologies when challenged with a range of realistic ageing errors and sampling regimes. We found that the development of a robust biochronology and the precision of environmental effect estimates can be seriously hampered by insufficient sample size. Moreover, the introduction of even moderate ageing error into the data can cause substantial underestimation of environmental sources of growth variation. This underestimation diminished our capacity to correctly quantify the known environment–growth relationship and more generally will lead to overly conservative conclusions concerning the growth response to environmental change. Careful study design, reduction of ageing errors, and large sample sizes are critical prerequisites if robust inferences are to be made from biochronological data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0706-652X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1205-7533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2019-0450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>1840 Woodward Drive, Suite 1, Ottawa, ON K2C 0P7: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Age determination ; Aging ; Analysis ; Climate change ; Computer simulation ; Environmental changes ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental effects ; Environmental factors ; Evaluation ; Fish ; Fish populations ; Fishes ; Gadus morhua ; Growth ; Marine ; Modelling ; Otolith reading ; Otoliths ; Populations ; Robustness ; Sensitivity analysis ; Time series ; Variability ; Variation</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences, 2020-09, Vol.77 (9), p.1552-1563</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 NRC Research Press</rights><rights>2020 Published by NRC Research Press</rights><rights>Copyright 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-95d9ee18a9af6c54282f14375dc7bfa93f2ec741bf95cacaa2e9a7f8d76e94c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-95d9ee18a9af6c54282f14375dc7bfa93f2ec741bf95cacaa2e9a7f8d76e94c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjfas-2019-0450$$EPDF$$P50$$Gnrcresearch$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full/10.1139/cjfas-2019-0450$$EHTML$$P50$$Gnrcresearch$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2932,27924,27925,64428,65234</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smoliński, Szymon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrongiello, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Sleen, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Bryan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campana, Steven E</creatorcontrib><title>Potential sources of bias in the climate sensitivities of fish otolith biochronologies</title><title>Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences</title><description>Analysis of growth increments in the hard parts of animals (e.g., fish otoliths) can be used to assess how organisms respond to variability in environmental conditions. In this study, mixed-effects models were applied to otolith data simulated for two hypothetical fish populations with assumed biological parameters and known growth response to environmental variability. Our objective was to assess the sensitivity of environment–growth relationships derived from otolith biochronologies when challenged with a range of realistic ageing errors and sampling regimes. We found that the development of a robust biochronology and the precision of environmental effect estimates can be seriously hampered by insufficient sample size. Moreover, the introduction of even moderate ageing error into the data can cause substantial underestimation of environmental sources of growth variation. This underestimation diminished our capacity to correctly quantify the known environment–growth relationship and more generally will lead to overly conservative conclusions concerning the growth response to environmental change. Careful study design, reduction of ageing errors, and large sample sizes are critical prerequisites if robust inferences are to be made from biochronological data.</description><subject>Age determination</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish populations</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Gadus morhua</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Otolith reading</subject><subject>Otoliths</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>0706-652X</issn><issn>1205-7533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqV0s9rFDEUB_AgFlyrZ6-DnjxMm58zk2Mp_igUlbaKt_A2-7KTZZpsk6zof99sx4OFRZEQAsnn-0LII-QVoyeMCX1qNw5yyynTLZWKPiELxqlqeyXEU7KgPe3aTvHvz8jznDeUMq4YXZBvX2LBUDxMTY67ZDE30TVLD7nxoSkjNnbyt1CwyRiyL_5HnTNyPo9NLHHyZayJaMcUQ5ziup6_IEcOpowvf6_H5Ov7dzfnH9vLzx8uzs8uW6uUKK1WK43IBtDgOqskH7hjUvRqZfulAy0cR9tLtnRaWbAAHDX0blj1HWppuTgmb-a62xTvdpiL2dRXhHql4XIYmOj0IP6uRCcpVXKv2lmtYULjg4slgV1jwARTDOh83T7rhOi4pEJW__qAt1t_Z_5EJwdQHSu89fZg1bePAtUU_FnWsMvZXFxf_Yf99NieztammHNCZ7apfmz6ZRg1-wYyDw1k9g1k9g1UE3xOhGQTZoRkx3-G7gEJwsdW</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Smoliński, Szymon</creator><creator>Morrongiello, John</creator><creator>van der Sleen, Peter</creator><creator>Black, Bryan A</creator><creator>Campana, Steven E</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Potential sources of bias in the climate sensitivities of fish otolith biochronologies</title><author>Smoliński, Szymon ; Morrongiello, John ; van der Sleen, Peter ; Black, Bryan A ; Campana, Steven E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-95d9ee18a9af6c54282f14375dc7bfa93f2ec741bf95cacaa2e9a7f8d76e94c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age determination</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish populations</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Gadus morhua</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Otolith reading</topic><topic>Otoliths</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smoliński, Szymon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrongiello, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Sleen, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Bryan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campana, Steven E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smoliński, Szymon</au><au>Morrongiello, John</au><au>van der Sleen, Peter</au><au>Black, Bryan A</au><au>Campana, Steven E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential sources of bias in the climate sensitivities of fish otolith biochronologies</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1552</spage><epage>1563</epage><pages>1552-1563</pages><issn>0706-652X</issn><eissn>1205-7533</eissn><abstract>Analysis of growth increments in the hard parts of animals (e.g., fish otoliths) can be used to assess how organisms respond to variability in environmental conditions. In this study, mixed-effects models were applied to otolith data simulated for two hypothetical fish populations with assumed biological parameters and known growth response to environmental variability. Our objective was to assess the sensitivity of environment–growth relationships derived from otolith biochronologies when challenged with a range of realistic ageing errors and sampling regimes. We found that the development of a robust biochronology and the precision of environmental effect estimates can be seriously hampered by insufficient sample size. Moreover, the introduction of even moderate ageing error into the data can cause substantial underestimation of environmental sources of growth variation. This underestimation diminished our capacity to correctly quantify the known environment–growth relationship and more generally will lead to overly conservative conclusions concerning the growth response to environmental change. Careful study design, reduction of ageing errors, and large sample sizes are critical prerequisites if robust inferences are to be made from biochronological data.</abstract><cop>1840 Woodward Drive, Suite 1, Ottawa, ON K2C 0P7</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/cjfas-2019-0450</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0706-652X
ispartof Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences, 2020-09, Vol.77 (9), p.1552-1563
issn 0706-652X
1205-7533
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A633624034
source NRC Research Press
subjects Age determination
Aging
Analysis
Climate change
Computer simulation
Environmental changes
Environmental conditions
Environmental effects
Environmental factors
Evaluation
Fish
Fish populations
Fishes
Gadus morhua
Growth
Marine
Modelling
Otolith reading
Otoliths
Populations
Robustness
Sensitivity analysis
Time series
Variability
Variation
title Potential sources of bias in the climate sensitivities of fish otolith biochronologies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A59%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20sources%20of%20bias%20in%20the%20climate%20sensitivities%20of%20fish%20otolith%20biochronologies&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20fisheries%20and%20aquatic%20sciences&rft.au=Smoli%C5%84ski,%20Szymon&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1552&rft.epage=1563&rft.pages=1552-1563&rft.issn=0706-652X&rft.eissn=1205-7533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/cjfas-2019-0450&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA633624034%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-95d9ee18a9af6c54282f14375dc7bfa93f2ec741bf95cacaa2e9a7f8d76e94c23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2436400543&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A633624034&rfr_iscdi=true