Loading…

Measurement of the effects of pH on phosphate availability

Aims Many soil scientists think that soil phosphate availability is highest at near-neutral pH and decreases with decreasing pH. This belief does not appear to have ever been subjected to experimental test. Methods In a pot trial, we measured response curves to phosphate at seven pH (CaCl2) values r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plant and soil 2020-09, Vol.454 (1-2), p.217-224
Main Authors: Barrow, N.J., Debnath, Abhijit, Sen, Arup
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-c1b7da0e07857e08a984ed80d93c39c24d9b6d75d1af3d3eb710a0645b11cdcd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-c1b7da0e07857e08a984ed80d93c39c24d9b6d75d1af3d3eb710a0645b11cdcd3
container_end_page 224
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 217
container_title Plant and soil
container_volume 454
creator Barrow, N.J.
Debnath, Abhijit
Sen, Arup
description Aims Many soil scientists think that soil phosphate availability is highest at near-neutral pH and decreases with decreasing pH. This belief does not appear to have ever been subjected to experimental test. Methods In a pot trial, we measured response curves to phosphate at seven pH (CaCl2) values ranging from 3.99 to 7.26 using three plant species: mustard ( Brassica campestris ), lucerne – also known as alfalfa – ( Medicago sativa ) and rice ( Oryza sativa ). We used a form of the Mitscherlich equation that allowed us to estimate the phosphate contribution from the soil as well as the slope of the response curve and the maximum yield. Results Plants grew best near pH 5.5 and worst at near-neutral pH. We think the large decrease in growth with increasing pH was caused by decreasing rate of P uptake by plants. There was a smaller decrease in growth as pH decreased below 5.5. We think this was caused by aluminium toxicity. Conclusions The conventional belief that phosphate availability is greatest near neutral pH is wrong.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11104-020-04647-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A636573496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A636573496</galeid><sourcerecordid>A636573496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-c1b7da0e07857e08a984ed80d93c39c24d9b6d75d1af3d3eb710a0645b11cdcd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAQx4MoOKdfwKd-gcxL0yatb2OoEya-KPgW0uSydXRNSTph397M-iz3cNxxv4P_j5B7BgsGIB8iYwwKCjlQKEQhaXlBZqyUnJbAxSWZAfCcgqy_rslNjHs4z0zMyOMb6ngMeMB-zLzLxh1m6ByaMZ7HYZ35Pht2Pg47PWKmv3Xb6abt2vF0S66c7iLe_fU5-Xx--lit6eb95XW13FDDOYzUsEZaDQiyKiVCpeuqQFuBrbnhtckLWzfCytIy7bjl2EgGGkRRNowZayyfk8X0d6s7VG3v_Bi0SWXx0Brfo2vTfim4SHmLWiQgnwATfIwBnRpCe9DhpBiosy416VJJl_rVpcoE8QmK6bjfYlB7fwx9CvYf9QP3Km0l</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement of the effects of pH on phosphate availability</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Barrow, N.J. ; Debnath, Abhijit ; Sen, Arup</creator><creatorcontrib>Barrow, N.J. ; Debnath, Abhijit ; Sen, Arup</creatorcontrib><description>Aims Many soil scientists think that soil phosphate availability is highest at near-neutral pH and decreases with decreasing pH. This belief does not appear to have ever been subjected to experimental test. Methods In a pot trial, we measured response curves to phosphate at seven pH (CaCl2) values ranging from 3.99 to 7.26 using three plant species: mustard ( Brassica campestris ), lucerne – also known as alfalfa – ( Medicago sativa ) and rice ( Oryza sativa ). We used a form of the Mitscherlich equation that allowed us to estimate the phosphate contribution from the soil as well as the slope of the response curve and the maximum yield. Results Plants grew best near pH 5.5 and worst at near-neutral pH. We think the large decrease in growth with increasing pH was caused by decreasing rate of P uptake by plants. There was a smaller decrease in growth as pH decreased below 5.5. We think this was caused by aluminium toxicity. Conclusions The conventional belief that phosphate availability is greatest near neutral pH is wrong.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-020-04647-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecology ; Life Sciences ; Measurement ; Phosphates ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2020-09, Vol.454 (1-2), p.217-224</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-c1b7da0e07857e08a984ed80d93c39c24d9b6d75d1af3d3eb710a0645b11cdcd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-c1b7da0e07857e08a984ed80d93c39c24d9b6d75d1af3d3eb710a0645b11cdcd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7695-5351</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barrow, N.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debnath, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Arup</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement of the effects of pH on phosphate availability</title><title>Plant and soil</title><addtitle>Plant Soil</addtitle><description>Aims Many soil scientists think that soil phosphate availability is highest at near-neutral pH and decreases with decreasing pH. This belief does not appear to have ever been subjected to experimental test. Methods In a pot trial, we measured response curves to phosphate at seven pH (CaCl2) values ranging from 3.99 to 7.26 using three plant species: mustard ( Brassica campestris ), lucerne – also known as alfalfa – ( Medicago sativa ) and rice ( Oryza sativa ). We used a form of the Mitscherlich equation that allowed us to estimate the phosphate contribution from the soil as well as the slope of the response curve and the maximum yield. Results Plants grew best near pH 5.5 and worst at near-neutral pH. We think the large decrease in growth with increasing pH was caused by decreasing rate of P uptake by plants. There was a smaller decrease in growth as pH decreased below 5.5. We think this was caused by aluminium toxicity. Conclusions The conventional belief that phosphate availability is greatest near neutral pH is wrong.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Phosphates</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAQx4MoOKdfwKd-gcxL0yatb2OoEya-KPgW0uSydXRNSTph397M-iz3cNxxv4P_j5B7BgsGIB8iYwwKCjlQKEQhaXlBZqyUnJbAxSWZAfCcgqy_rslNjHs4z0zMyOMb6ngMeMB-zLzLxh1m6ByaMZ7HYZ35Pht2Pg47PWKmv3Xb6abt2vF0S66c7iLe_fU5-Xx--lit6eb95XW13FDDOYzUsEZaDQiyKiVCpeuqQFuBrbnhtckLWzfCytIy7bjl2EgGGkRRNowZayyfk8X0d6s7VG3v_Bi0SWXx0Brfo2vTfim4SHmLWiQgnwATfIwBnRpCe9DhpBiosy416VJJl_rVpcoE8QmK6bjfYlB7fwx9CvYf9QP3Km0l</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Barrow, N.J.</creator><creator>Debnath, Abhijit</creator><creator>Sen, Arup</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7695-5351</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Measurement of the effects of pH on phosphate availability</title><author>Barrow, N.J. ; Debnath, Abhijit ; Sen, Arup</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-c1b7da0e07857e08a984ed80d93c39c24d9b6d75d1af3d3eb710a0645b11cdcd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Phosphates</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrow, N.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debnath, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Arup</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrow, N.J.</au><au>Debnath, Abhijit</au><au>Sen, Arup</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement of the effects of pH on phosphate availability</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><stitle>Plant Soil</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>454</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>217-224</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><abstract>Aims Many soil scientists think that soil phosphate availability is highest at near-neutral pH and decreases with decreasing pH. This belief does not appear to have ever been subjected to experimental test. Methods In a pot trial, we measured response curves to phosphate at seven pH (CaCl2) values ranging from 3.99 to 7.26 using three plant species: mustard ( Brassica campestris ), lucerne – also known as alfalfa – ( Medicago sativa ) and rice ( Oryza sativa ). We used a form of the Mitscherlich equation that allowed us to estimate the phosphate contribution from the soil as well as the slope of the response curve and the maximum yield. Results Plants grew best near pH 5.5 and worst at near-neutral pH. We think the large decrease in growth with increasing pH was caused by decreasing rate of P uptake by plants. There was a smaller decrease in growth as pH decreased below 5.5. We think this was caused by aluminium toxicity. Conclusions The conventional belief that phosphate availability is greatest near neutral pH is wrong.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-020-04647-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7695-5351</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-079X
ispartof Plant and soil, 2020-09, Vol.454 (1-2), p.217-224
issn 0032-079X
1573-5036
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A636573496
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Link
subjects Analysis
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Ecology
Life Sciences
Measurement
Phosphates
Plant Physiology
Plant Sciences
Soil Science & Conservation
title Measurement of the effects of pH on phosphate availability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A32%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20of%20the%20effects%20of%20pH%20on%20phosphate%20availability&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Barrow,%20N.J.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=454&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=217-224&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-020-04647-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA636573496%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-c1b7da0e07857e08a984ed80d93c39c24d9b6d75d1af3d3eb710a0645b11cdcd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A636573496&rfr_iscdi=true