Loading…

Ecological consequences of Great Lakes salmon subsidies for stream-resident brook and brown trout

Introduced Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) deliver novel, pulsed resource subsidies to Great Lakes streams. We explored interactions between native brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and non-native brown trout (Salmo trutta) in the context of this resource pulse. Diets surveyed before and during...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences 2020-11, Vol.77 (11), p.1758-1771
Main Authors: Hermann, Nathan T, Chaloner, Dominic T, Gerig, Brandon S, Lamberti, Gary A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduced Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) deliver novel, pulsed resource subsidies to Great Lakes streams. We explored interactions between native brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and non-native brown trout (Salmo trutta) in the context of this resource pulse. Diets surveyed before and during salmon spawning showed that, regardless of species, trout consumed 4.5-fold more biomass during than before salmon runs. Brook trout grew more quickly than brown trout under controlled feeding regimes due, in part, to their higher food conversion efficiency of 36% compared with 21%. Bioenergetics model simulations explored the influence of temperature on the exploitation of resource pulses and found 35% lower growth rates and increased gorging at colder temperatures. Overall, we found evidence that brook trout and brown trout foraging and growth are modulated by the salmon resource pulse, especially through gorging on eggs. However, these species exhibit distinct physiological adaptations and environmental preferences that may influence their ultimate capacity to exploit resource pulses. The effects of environmental conditions and salmon subsidies on stream-resident trout have broader consequences for fisheries management and conservation efforts.
ISSN:0706-652X
1205-7533
DOI:10.1139/cjfas-2020-0086