TTCOV19: timing of tracheotomy in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial

• Published in: Critical Care 2022, Vol.26 (1)
• Main Authors: Eeg-Olofsson, Måns, Pauli, Nina, Hafsten, Louise, Jacobsson, Josephine, Lundborg, Christopher, Brink, Magnus, Larsson, Helen, Lindell, Ellen, Löwhagen, Karin, Gisslén, Magnus, Bergquist, Henrik
• Format: Report
• Language: English
• Subjects: Care and treatment; Comparative analysis; Critically ill; Patient outcomes; Tracheotomy
• ISSN: 1364-8535
• DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-04005-0

Background Critically ill COVID-19 patients may develop acute respiratory distress syndrome and the need for respiratory support, including mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. Previous observational studies have suggested early tracheotomy to be advantageous. The aim of this parallel, multicentre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the optimal timing of tracheotomy. Methods SARS-CoV-2-infected patients within the Region Västra Götaland of Sweden who needed intubation and mechanical respiratory support were included and randomly assigned to early tracheotomy ([less than or equai to] 7 days after intubation) or late tracheotomy ([greater than or equai to] 10 days after intubation). The primary objective was to compare the total number of mechanical ventilation days between the groups. Results One hundred fifty patients (mean age 65 years, 79% males) were included. Seventy-two patients were assigned to early tracheotomy, and 78 were assigned to late tracheotomy. One hundred two patients (68%) underwent tracheotomy of whom sixty-one underwent tracheotomy according to the protocol. The overall median number of days in mechanical ventilation was 18 (IQR 9; 28), but no significant difference was found between the two treatment regimens in the intention-to-treat analysis (between-group difference: - 1.5 days (95% CI - 5.7 to 2.8); p = 0.5). A significantly reduced number of mechanical ventilation days was found in the early tracheotomy group during the per-protocol analysis (between-group difference: - 8.0 days (95% CI - 13.8 to - 2.27); p = 0.0064). The overall correlation between the timing of tracheotomy and days of mechanical ventilation was significant (Spearman's correlation: 0.39, p < 0.0001). The total death rate during intensive care was 32.7%, but no significant differences were found between the groups regarding survival, complications or adverse events. Conclusions The potential superiority of early tracheotomy when compared to late tracheotomy in critically ill patients with COVID-19 was not confirmed by the present randomized controlled trial but is a strategy that should be considered in selected cases where the need for MV for more than 14 days cannot be ruled out. Trial registrationNCT04412356, registered 05/24/2020. Graphic abstract Keywords: COVID-19, Mechanical ventilation, Intensive care, Time factors, Tracheotomy