Loading…

Plenty of Planning, Scanty Guidance: Evaluating the Implementation Degree of the General Master Plan in the City of Tampere, Finland

Digitalizing cities has become increasingly complex and difficult to control despite advanced computational tools. The comprehension of emergent, dynamic agent–pattern interaction is limited. Studies show that the implementation of large-scale plans occasionally fails to meet expectations due to unc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability 2022, Vol.14 (22)
Main Authors: Kuusela, Kaisu, Partanen, Jenni
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 22
container_start_page
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Kuusela, Kaisu
Partanen, Jenni
description Digitalizing cities has become increasingly complex and difficult to control despite advanced computational tools. The comprehension of emergent, dynamic agent–pattern interaction is limited. Studies show that the implementation of large-scale plans occasionally fails to meet expectations due to uncertainty in urban actor processes and institutions. Theories of complexity and resilience reflecting urban unpredictability and non-equilibrium enable understanding and planning methods for guiding actors. We explored empirically via close reading and spatial analyses the ability of the traditional master planning instrument to steer the actor allocation in Tampere, Finland. The plan apparently failed to appropriately guide the actors, who formed self-organizing patterns colliding with the planning aims enabled by deviations and lower-level planning instruments. The planning mode was either enabling or reactive. We recognized three types of self-organization: single-point attraction, emergent type, and location-based self-organization. Self-organization was the major force behind urban transition. Only certain large-scale projects in the city center somewhat complied with the planning aims, however through negotiations. We proposed planning solutions encouraging and guiding self-organizing patterns by recognizing complexity in strategies, and with loose plans, constant monitoring, correcting, and experimenting in planning. The results participate in building more general knowledge of planning considering self-organizing urban dynamics and provide applications for urban planning.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su142215197
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A747189836</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747189836</galeid><sourcerecordid>A747189836</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7471898363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjUFPwzAMhSMEEhPsxB_wD9hG3Gzryg2NbXBAmsTuyGrdEpS6U5IiceeHkw4OXLEPfnqf3rNSN6hnxhT6NvQ4zzJcYJGfqVGmc5yiXujzP_pSjUN412mMwQKXI_W1dyzxE7oa9o5ErDQTeClp8Ha9rUhKvoPNB7meYoIQ3xie2qPjNuWS1Qk8cOOZh4oB7ljYk4NnCpH9qRWsnNDa_nw6UHtkzxPYWkm4ulYXNbnA4997pWbbzWH9OG3I8auVuoueyrQVt7bshGub_Pt8nuOqWJml-XfgGzCPXxU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Plenty of Planning, Scanty Guidance: Evaluating the Implementation Degree of the General Master Plan in the City of Tampere, Finland</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Kuusela, Kaisu ; Partanen, Jenni</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuusela, Kaisu ; Partanen, Jenni</creatorcontrib><description>Digitalizing cities has become increasingly complex and difficult to control despite advanced computational tools. The comprehension of emergent, dynamic agent–pattern interaction is limited. Studies show that the implementation of large-scale plans occasionally fails to meet expectations due to uncertainty in urban actor processes and institutions. Theories of complexity and resilience reflecting urban unpredictability and non-equilibrium enable understanding and planning methods for guiding actors. We explored empirically via close reading and spatial analyses the ability of the traditional master planning instrument to steer the actor allocation in Tampere, Finland. The plan apparently failed to appropriately guide the actors, who formed self-organizing patterns colliding with the planning aims enabled by deviations and lower-level planning instruments. The planning mode was either enabling or reactive. We recognized three types of self-organization: single-point attraction, emergent type, and location-based self-organization. Self-organization was the major force behind urban transition. Only certain large-scale projects in the city center somewhat complied with the planning aims, however through negotiations. We proposed planning solutions encouraging and guiding self-organizing patterns by recognizing complexity in strategies, and with loose plans, constant monitoring, correcting, and experimenting in planning. The results participate in building more general knowledge of planning considering self-organizing urban dynamics and provide applications for urban planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su142215197</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>City planning ; Methods</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022, Vol.14 (22)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,4476,27899</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuusela, Kaisu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partanen, Jenni</creatorcontrib><title>Plenty of Planning, Scanty Guidance: Evaluating the Implementation Degree of the General Master Plan in the City of Tampere, Finland</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Digitalizing cities has become increasingly complex and difficult to control despite advanced computational tools. The comprehension of emergent, dynamic agent–pattern interaction is limited. Studies show that the implementation of large-scale plans occasionally fails to meet expectations due to uncertainty in urban actor processes and institutions. Theories of complexity and resilience reflecting urban unpredictability and non-equilibrium enable understanding and planning methods for guiding actors. We explored empirically via close reading and spatial analyses the ability of the traditional master planning instrument to steer the actor allocation in Tampere, Finland. The plan apparently failed to appropriately guide the actors, who formed self-organizing patterns colliding with the planning aims enabled by deviations and lower-level planning instruments. The planning mode was either enabling or reactive. We recognized three types of self-organization: single-point attraction, emergent type, and location-based self-organization. Self-organization was the major force behind urban transition. Only certain large-scale projects in the city center somewhat complied with the planning aims, however through negotiations. We proposed planning solutions encouraging and guiding self-organizing patterns by recognizing complexity in strategies, and with loose plans, constant monitoring, correcting, and experimenting in planning. The results participate in building more general knowledge of planning considering self-organizing urban dynamics and provide applications for urban planning.</description><subject>City planning</subject><subject>Methods</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVjUFPwzAMhSMEEhPsxB_wD9hG3Gzryg2NbXBAmsTuyGrdEpS6U5IiceeHkw4OXLEPfnqf3rNSN6hnxhT6NvQ4zzJcYJGfqVGmc5yiXujzP_pSjUN412mMwQKXI_W1dyzxE7oa9o5ErDQTeClp8Ha9rUhKvoPNB7meYoIQ3xie2qPjNuWS1Qk8cOOZh4oB7ljYk4NnCpH9qRWsnNDa_nw6UHtkzxPYWkm4ulYXNbnA4997pWbbzWH9OG3I8auVuoueyrQVt7bshGub_Pt8nuOqWJml-XfgGzCPXxU</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Kuusela, Kaisu</creator><creator>Partanen, Jenni</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Plenty of Planning, Scanty Guidance: Evaluating the Implementation Degree of the General Master Plan in the City of Tampere, Finland</title><author>Kuusela, Kaisu ; Partanen, Jenni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7471898363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>City planning</topic><topic>Methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuusela, Kaisu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partanen, Jenni</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuusela, Kaisu</au><au>Partanen, Jenni</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Plenty of Planning, Scanty Guidance: Evaluating the Implementation Degree of the General Master Plan in the City of Tampere, Finland</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>22</issue><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Digitalizing cities has become increasingly complex and difficult to control despite advanced computational tools. The comprehension of emergent, dynamic agent–pattern interaction is limited. Studies show that the implementation of large-scale plans occasionally fails to meet expectations due to uncertainty in urban actor processes and institutions. Theories of complexity and resilience reflecting urban unpredictability and non-equilibrium enable understanding and planning methods for guiding actors. We explored empirically via close reading and spatial analyses the ability of the traditional master planning instrument to steer the actor allocation in Tampere, Finland. The plan apparently failed to appropriately guide the actors, who formed self-organizing patterns colliding with the planning aims enabled by deviations and lower-level planning instruments. The planning mode was either enabling or reactive. We recognized three types of self-organization: single-point attraction, emergent type, and location-based self-organization. Self-organization was the major force behind urban transition. Only certain large-scale projects in the city center somewhat complied with the planning aims, however through negotiations. We proposed planning solutions encouraging and guiding self-organizing patterns by recognizing complexity in strategies, and with loose plans, constant monitoring, correcting, and experimenting in planning. The results participate in building more general knowledge of planning considering self-organizing urban dynamics and provide applications for urban planning.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su142215197</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022, Vol.14 (22)
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A747189836
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects City planning
Methods
title Plenty of Planning, Scanty Guidance: Evaluating the Implementation Degree of the General Master Plan in the City of Tampere, Finland
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-27T00%3A41%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Plenty%20of%20Planning,%20Scanty%20Guidance:%20Evaluating%20the%20Implementation%20Degree%20of%20the%20General%20Master%20Plan%20in%20the%20City%20of%20Tampere,%20Finland&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Kuusela,%20Kaisu&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=22&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su142215197&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA747189836%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7471898363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A747189836&rfr_iscdi=true