Loading…

Comparing Traditional and “In-Motion” Intense Pulsed Light Techniques for Hair Removal: A Split Study

Background and Objectives: Hair removal is a common aesthetic concern for patients referred to dermatologists and aesthetic physicians. Lasers and lights are one of the mainstays in the management of this condition. Among these devices, intense pulsed lights (IPLs) are broadly used in order to reduc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cosmetics 2023, Vol.10 (2)
Main Authors: Bennardo, Luigi, Nisticò, Steven Paul, Primavera, Grazia, Tolone, Ma, Tamburi, Federica, Bennardo, Stefano, Cannarozzo, Giovanni
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Cosmetics
container_volume 10
creator Bennardo, Luigi
Nisticò, Steven Paul
Primavera, Grazia
Tolone, Ma
Tamburi, Federica
Bennardo, Stefano
Cannarozzo, Giovanni
description Background and Objectives: Hair removal is a common aesthetic concern for patients referred to dermatologists and aesthetic physicians. Lasers and lights are one of the mainstays in the management of this condition. Among these devices, intense pulsed lights (IPLs) are broadly used in order to reduce the number and width of the hair present. Currently used techniques are associated with a high risk of side effects, such as hyper or hypopigmentation. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients seeking hair removal in one or more body areas with skin phototypes 1 to 4 were recruited to perform this study. All areas to be treated were divided into two equal regions; one side was treated with the standard IPL hair removal procedure, while the other was treated with a new “in-motion” IPL technology. Results and hair removal rates were evaluated six months after the last treatment. Results: Out of the 30 patients treated, all patients experienced hair reduction. No statistically significant difference in hair removal was noted among the two sides. A statistically significant reduction in pain during the procedure was observed in the side treated with the “in-motion” technique. Conclusions: Traditional and “in-motion” IPL techniques have similar results in hair removal; the “in-motion” technology seems to guarantee a better safety profile than the traditional technique, as well as maintains the same results over time and a faster treatment time. A more extensive clinical study will be necessary to confirm our study’s results.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/cosmetics10020059
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A747443016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747443016</galeid><sourcerecordid>A747443016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7474430163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVi8FKAzEURYMoWLQf4O79wNSXydQx7kpRWqggdvYSksz0SSapSUZw1w_Rn-uXOIILt3IX53LgMHbFcSaExGsdUm8z6cQRS8S5PGGTEmtZyPK2Ov3zz9k0pVdE5KKcCy4njJah36tIvoMmKkOZglcOlDdwPHyuffEYftTx8AVrn61PFp4Gl6yBDXW7DI3VO09vg03QhggrRRGebR_elbuDBWz3jjJs82A-LtlZq8Zy-ssLNnu4b5arolPOvpBvQ45KjzO2Jx28bWn0i7qqq0ogvxH_Dr4BtTNaRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Comparing Traditional and “In-Motion” Intense Pulsed Light Techniques for Hair Removal: A Split Study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Bennardo, Luigi ; Nisticò, Steven Paul ; Primavera, Grazia ; Tolone, Ma ; Tamburi, Federica ; Bennardo, Stefano ; Cannarozzo, Giovanni</creator><creatorcontrib>Bennardo, Luigi ; Nisticò, Steven Paul ; Primavera, Grazia ; Tolone, Ma ; Tamburi, Federica ; Bennardo, Stefano ; Cannarozzo, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives: Hair removal is a common aesthetic concern for patients referred to dermatologists and aesthetic physicians. Lasers and lights are one of the mainstays in the management of this condition. Among these devices, intense pulsed lights (IPLs) are broadly used in order to reduce the number and width of the hair present. Currently used techniques are associated with a high risk of side effects, such as hyper or hypopigmentation. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients seeking hair removal in one or more body areas with skin phototypes 1 to 4 were recruited to perform this study. All areas to be treated were divided into two equal regions; one side was treated with the standard IPL hair removal procedure, while the other was treated with a new “in-motion” IPL technology. Results and hair removal rates were evaluated six months after the last treatment. Results: Out of the 30 patients treated, all patients experienced hair reduction. No statistically significant difference in hair removal was noted among the two sides. A statistically significant reduction in pain during the procedure was observed in the side treated with the “in-motion” technique. Conclusions: Traditional and “in-motion” IPL techniques have similar results in hair removal; the “in-motion” technology seems to guarantee a better safety profile than the traditional technique, as well as maintains the same results over time and a faster treatment time. A more extensive clinical study will be necessary to confirm our study’s results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-9284</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-9284</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cosmetics10020059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Hair ; Removal</subject><ispartof>Cosmetics, 2023, Vol.10 (2)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,4476,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bennardo, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nisticò, Steven Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Primavera, Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolone, Ma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamburi, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennardo, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannarozzo, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Traditional and “In-Motion” Intense Pulsed Light Techniques for Hair Removal: A Split Study</title><title>Cosmetics</title><description>Background and Objectives: Hair removal is a common aesthetic concern for patients referred to dermatologists and aesthetic physicians. Lasers and lights are one of the mainstays in the management of this condition. Among these devices, intense pulsed lights (IPLs) are broadly used in order to reduce the number and width of the hair present. Currently used techniques are associated with a high risk of side effects, such as hyper or hypopigmentation. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients seeking hair removal in one or more body areas with skin phototypes 1 to 4 were recruited to perform this study. All areas to be treated were divided into two equal regions; one side was treated with the standard IPL hair removal procedure, while the other was treated with a new “in-motion” IPL technology. Results and hair removal rates were evaluated six months after the last treatment. Results: Out of the 30 patients treated, all patients experienced hair reduction. No statistically significant difference in hair removal was noted among the two sides. A statistically significant reduction in pain during the procedure was observed in the side treated with the “in-motion” technique. Conclusions: Traditional and “in-motion” IPL techniques have similar results in hair removal; the “in-motion” technology seems to guarantee a better safety profile than the traditional technique, as well as maintains the same results over time and a faster treatment time. A more extensive clinical study will be necessary to confirm our study’s results.</description><subject>Hair</subject><subject>Removal</subject><issn>2079-9284</issn><issn>2079-9284</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVi8FKAzEURYMoWLQf4O79wNSXydQx7kpRWqggdvYSksz0SSapSUZw1w_Rn-uXOIILt3IX53LgMHbFcSaExGsdUm8z6cQRS8S5PGGTEmtZyPK2Ov3zz9k0pVdE5KKcCy4njJah36tIvoMmKkOZglcOlDdwPHyuffEYftTx8AVrn61PFp4Gl6yBDXW7DI3VO09vg03QhggrRRGebR_elbuDBWz3jjJs82A-LtlZq8Zy-ssLNnu4b5arolPOvpBvQ45KjzO2Jx28bWn0i7qqq0ogvxH_Dr4BtTNaRA</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Bennardo, Luigi</creator><creator>Nisticò, Steven Paul</creator><creator>Primavera, Grazia</creator><creator>Tolone, Ma</creator><creator>Tamburi, Federica</creator><creator>Bennardo, Stefano</creator><creator>Cannarozzo, Giovanni</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Comparing Traditional and “In-Motion” Intense Pulsed Light Techniques for Hair Removal: A Split Study</title><author>Bennardo, Luigi ; Nisticò, Steven Paul ; Primavera, Grazia ; Tolone, Ma ; Tamburi, Federica ; Bennardo, Stefano ; Cannarozzo, Giovanni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7474430163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Hair</topic><topic>Removal</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bennardo, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nisticò, Steven Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Primavera, Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolone, Ma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamburi, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennardo, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannarozzo, Giovanni</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bennardo, Luigi</au><au>Nisticò, Steven Paul</au><au>Primavera, Grazia</au><au>Tolone, Ma</au><au>Tamburi, Federica</au><au>Bennardo, Stefano</au><au>Cannarozzo, Giovanni</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Comparing Traditional and “In-Motion” Intense Pulsed Light Techniques for Hair Removal: A Split Study</atitle><jtitle>Cosmetics</jtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>2079-9284</issn><eissn>2079-9284</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives: Hair removal is a common aesthetic concern for patients referred to dermatologists and aesthetic physicians. Lasers and lights are one of the mainstays in the management of this condition. Among these devices, intense pulsed lights (IPLs) are broadly used in order to reduce the number and width of the hair present. Currently used techniques are associated with a high risk of side effects, such as hyper or hypopigmentation. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients seeking hair removal in one or more body areas with skin phototypes 1 to 4 were recruited to perform this study. All areas to be treated were divided into two equal regions; one side was treated with the standard IPL hair removal procedure, while the other was treated with a new “in-motion” IPL technology. Results and hair removal rates were evaluated six months after the last treatment. Results: Out of the 30 patients treated, all patients experienced hair reduction. No statistically significant difference in hair removal was noted among the two sides. A statistically significant reduction in pain during the procedure was observed in the side treated with the “in-motion” technique. Conclusions: Traditional and “in-motion” IPL techniques have similar results in hair removal; the “in-motion” technology seems to guarantee a better safety profile than the traditional technique, as well as maintains the same results over time and a faster treatment time. A more extensive clinical study will be necessary to confirm our study’s results.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/cosmetics10020059</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2079-9284
ispartof Cosmetics, 2023, Vol.10 (2)
issn 2079-9284
2079-9284
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A747443016
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Hair
Removal
title Comparing Traditional and “In-Motion” Intense Pulsed Light Techniques for Hair Removal: A Split Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T16%3A08%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Traditional%20and%20%E2%80%9CIn-Motion%E2%80%9D%20Intense%20Pulsed%20Light%20Techniques%20for%20Hair%20Removal:%20A%20Split%20Study&rft.jtitle=Cosmetics&rft.au=Bennardo,%20Luigi&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=2079-9284&rft.eissn=2079-9284&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cosmetics10020059&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA747443016%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7474430163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A747443016&rfr_iscdi=true