Loading…
Using Learning Analytics to Support Engagement in Collaborative Writing
Online collaborative writing tools provide an efficient way to complete a writing task. However, existing tools only focus on technological affordances and ignore the importance of social affordances in a collaborative learning environment. This article describes a learning analytic system that anal...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of distance education technologies 2017-10, Vol.15 (4), p.79-98 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-eb67f74c8672818587580a7b59876e6240979c6dcfcfa005099b470542c2a8e33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-eb67f74c8672818587580a7b59876e6240979c6dcfcfa005099b470542c2a8e33 |
container_end_page | 98 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | International journal of distance education technologies |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Liu, Ming Liu, Li Pardo, Abelardo |
description | Online collaborative writing tools provide an efficient way to complete a writing task. However, existing tools only focus on technological affordances and ignore the importance of social affordances in a collaborative learning environment. This article describes a learning analytic system that analyzes writing behaviors, and creates visualizations incorporating individual engagement awareness and group ranking awareness (social affordance), and review writing behaviour history (technological affordance), to support student engagement. Studies examined the performance of the system used by university students in two collaborative writing activities: collaboratively writing a project proposal (N = 41) and writing tutorial discussion answers (N = 25). Results show that students agreed with what the visualization conveys and visualizations enhance their engagement in a collaborative writing activity. In addition, students stated that the visualizations were useful to help them reflect on the writing process and support the assessment of individual contributions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4018/IJDET.2017100105 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A759477795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A759477795</galeid><ericid>EJ1155062</ericid><sourcerecordid>A759477795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-eb67f74c8672818587580a7b59876e6240979c6dcfcfa005099b470542c2a8e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1LAzEUXETB-nH3Iix48dL6sptskmOptVYKHtriMaRpdknZbtYkFfz3pq5WECWHPN6bGYaZJLlCMMCA2N306X68GGSAKAJAQI6SHiI57-cI8ePDDHCanHm_AcgQx3kvmSy9aap0pqVr9sOwkfV7MMqnwabzXdtaF9JxU8lKb3UTUtOkI1vXcmWdDOZNpy_OhEi8SE5KWXt9-fWfJ8uH8WL02J89T6aj4ayvMEWhr1cFLSlWrKAZQ4wwShhIuiKc0UIXGQZOuSrWqlSlBCDA-QpTIDhTmWQ6z8-Tm063dfZ1p30QG7tz0bQXGc9pVMVsjxp0qErWWpimtMFJFd9ab42yjS5N3A8p4ZhSykkkQEdQznrvdClaZ7bSvQsEYp-v-MxX_OQbKdcdRTujDvDxE0KEQJHF-213N5X5MflbRrTrMkInf0Ar8d2KOLQighXz_yzFjj8A4OaZaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2937728483</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Learning Analytics to Support Engagement in Collaborative Writing</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Library & Information Science Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Liu, Ming ; Liu, Li ; Pardo, Abelardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ming ; Liu, Li ; Pardo, Abelardo</creatorcontrib><description>Online collaborative writing tools provide an efficient way to complete a writing task. However, existing tools only focus on technological affordances and ignore the importance of social affordances in a collaborative learning environment. This article describes a learning analytic system that analyzes writing behaviors, and creates visualizations incorporating individual engagement awareness and group ranking awareness (social affordance), and review writing behaviour history (technological affordance), to support student engagement. Studies examined the performance of the system used by university students in two collaborative writing activities: collaboratively writing a project proposal (N = 41) and writing tutorial discussion answers (N = 25). Results show that students agreed with what the visualization conveys and visualizations enhance their engagement in a collaborative writing activity. In addition, students stated that the visualizations were useful to help them reflect on the writing process and support the assessment of individual contributions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1539-3100</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-3119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4018/IJDET.2017100105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hershey: IGI Global</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Behavior ; Behavior Patterns ; Collaboration ; Collaborative Writing ; College students ; Colleges & universities ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Computer Science Education ; Computer Software ; Cooperative learning ; Data Analysis ; Distance learning ; Education ; Educational technology ; Engineering ; Feedback ; Foreign Countries ; Formative Evaluation ; Group Dynamics ; Group work in education ; Learner Engagement ; Learning ; Learning analytics ; Learning environment ; Online Systems ; Scores ; Second language learning ; Statistical Analysis ; Student Attitudes ; Student participation ; Students ; Summative Evaluation ; Teaching ; Team learning approach in education ; Tutorial Programs ; Undergraduate Students ; University students ; Visual Aids ; Visualization ; Writing ; Writing Processes</subject><ispartof>International journal of distance education technologies, 2017-10, Vol.15 (4), p.79-98</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 IGI Global</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-eb67f74c8672818587580a7b59876e6240979c6dcfcfa005099b470542c2a8e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-eb67f74c8672818587580a7b59876e6240979c6dcfcfa005099b470542c2a8e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2937728483/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2937728483?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11666,12829,21356,21359,21372,27281,27900,27901,31245,33587,33853,33882,34111,36036,43708,43855,43867,44338,74191,74366,74378,74864</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1155062$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardo, Abelardo</creatorcontrib><title>Using Learning Analytics to Support Engagement in Collaborative Writing</title><title>International journal of distance education technologies</title><description>Online collaborative writing tools provide an efficient way to complete a writing task. However, existing tools only focus on technological affordances and ignore the importance of social affordances in a collaborative learning environment. This article describes a learning analytic system that analyzes writing behaviors, and creates visualizations incorporating individual engagement awareness and group ranking awareness (social affordance), and review writing behaviour history (technological affordance), to support student engagement. Studies examined the performance of the system used by university students in two collaborative writing activities: collaboratively writing a project proposal (N = 41) and writing tutorial discussion answers (N = 25). Results show that students agreed with what the visualization conveys and visualizations enhance their engagement in a collaborative writing activity. In addition, students stated that the visualizations were useful to help them reflect on the writing process and support the assessment of individual contributions.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Patterns</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Collaborative Writing</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Computer Science Education</subject><subject>Computer Software</subject><subject>Cooperative learning</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational technology</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Formative Evaluation</subject><subject>Group Dynamics</subject><subject>Group work in education</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning analytics</subject><subject>Learning environment</subject><subject>Online Systems</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Second language learning</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student participation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Summative Evaluation</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Team learning approach in education</subject><subject>Tutorial Programs</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>University students</subject><subject>Visual Aids</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing Processes</subject><issn>1539-3100</issn><issn>1539-3119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1LAzEUXETB-nH3Iix48dL6sptskmOptVYKHtriMaRpdknZbtYkFfz3pq5WECWHPN6bGYaZJLlCMMCA2N306X68GGSAKAJAQI6SHiI57-cI8ePDDHCanHm_AcgQx3kvmSy9aap0pqVr9sOwkfV7MMqnwabzXdtaF9JxU8lKb3UTUtOkI1vXcmWdDOZNpy_OhEi8SE5KWXt9-fWfJ8uH8WL02J89T6aj4ayvMEWhr1cFLSlWrKAZQ4wwShhIuiKc0UIXGQZOuSrWqlSlBCDA-QpTIDhTmWQ6z8-Tm063dfZ1p30QG7tz0bQXGc9pVMVsjxp0qErWWpimtMFJFd9ab42yjS5N3A8p4ZhSykkkQEdQznrvdClaZ7bSvQsEYp-v-MxX_OQbKdcdRTujDvDxE0KEQJHF-213N5X5MflbRrTrMkInf0Ar8d2KOLQighXz_yzFjj8A4OaZaA</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Liu, Ming</creator><creator>Liu, Li</creator><creator>Pardo, Abelardo</creator><general>IGI Global</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Using Learning Analytics to Support Engagement in Collaborative Writing</title><author>Liu, Ming ; Liu, Li ; Pardo, Abelardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-eb67f74c8672818587580a7b59876e6240979c6dcfcfa005099b470542c2a8e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Patterns</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Collaborative Writing</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Computer Science Education</topic><topic>Computer Software</topic><topic>Cooperative learning</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational technology</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Formative Evaluation</topic><topic>Group Dynamics</topic><topic>Group work in education</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning analytics</topic><topic>Learning environment</topic><topic>Online Systems</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Second language learning</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student participation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Summative Evaluation</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Team learning approach in education</topic><topic>Tutorial Programs</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>University students</topic><topic>Visual Aids</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing Processes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardo, Abelardo</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of distance education technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Ming</au><au>Liu, Li</au><au>Pardo, Abelardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1155062</ericid><atitle>Using Learning Analytics to Support Engagement in Collaborative Writing</atitle><jtitle>International journal of distance education technologies</jtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>79-98</pages><issn>1539-3100</issn><eissn>1539-3119</eissn><abstract>Online collaborative writing tools provide an efficient way to complete a writing task. However, existing tools only focus on technological affordances and ignore the importance of social affordances in a collaborative learning environment. This article describes a learning analytic system that analyzes writing behaviors, and creates visualizations incorporating individual engagement awareness and group ranking awareness (social affordance), and review writing behaviour history (technological affordance), to support student engagement. Studies examined the performance of the system used by university students in two collaborative writing activities: collaboratively writing a project proposal (N = 41) and writing tutorial discussion answers (N = 25). Results show that students agreed with what the visualization conveys and visualizations enhance their engagement in a collaborative writing activity. In addition, students stated that the visualizations were useful to help them reflect on the writing process and support the assessment of individual contributions.</abstract><cop>Hershey</cop><pub>IGI Global</pub><doi>10.4018/IJDET.2017100105</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1539-3100 |
ispartof | International journal of distance education technologies, 2017-10, Vol.15 (4), p.79-98 |
issn | 1539-3100 1539-3119 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A759477795 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Library & Information Science Collection; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Education Collection |
subjects | Analysis Behavior Behavior Patterns Collaboration Collaborative Writing College students Colleges & universities Computer Assisted Instruction Computer Science Education Computer Software Cooperative learning Data Analysis Distance learning Education Educational technology Engineering Feedback Foreign Countries Formative Evaluation Group Dynamics Group work in education Learner Engagement Learning Learning analytics Learning environment Online Systems Scores Second language learning Statistical Analysis Student Attitudes Student participation Students Summative Evaluation Teaching Team learning approach in education Tutorial Programs Undergraduate Students University students Visual Aids Visualization Writing Writing Processes |
title | Using Learning Analytics to Support Engagement in Collaborative Writing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T12%3A42%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Learning%20Analytics%20to%20Support%20Engagement%20in%20Collaborative%20Writing&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20distance%20education%20technologies&rft.au=Liu,%20Ming&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=79-98&rft.issn=1539-3100&rft.eissn=1539-3119&rft_id=info:doi/10.4018/IJDET.2017100105&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA759477795%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-eb67f74c8672818587580a7b59876e6240979c6dcfcfa005099b470542c2a8e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2937728483&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A759477795&rft_ericid=EJ1155062&rfr_iscdi=true |