The double exclusion of immigrant youth

Congress created Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) in 1990 to protect vulnerable children from deportation by providing a pathway to lawful permanent residency and citizenship. Although relatively few immigrant children applied for SIJS in the early years of the program, the number of SIJS pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Georgetown law journal 2023-06, Vol.111 (6), p.1407-1493
Main Authors: Hlass, Laila L, Davidson, Rachel Leya, Kocher, Austin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abused children
Child welfare
Children & youth
Children's rights
Citizenship
Deportation
Emigration and immigration law
Evaluation
Family law
Illegal immigrants
Immigrant youth
Immigration
Immigration policy
Laws, regulations and rules
Noncitizens
Politics and government
Practice
Teenage immigrants
Unaccompanied children
Vulnerability (Personality trait)
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Congress created Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) in 1990 to protect vulnerable children from deportation by providing a pathway to lawful permanent residency and citizenship. Although relatively few immigrant children applied for SIJS in the early years of the program, the number of SIJS petitions grew significantly over the past decade. The growth of SIJS petitions coincides with growing numbers of immigrant youth arriving at the US-Mexico border and with the politicization of immigrant youth who are increasingly represented as national security threats. Despite the high stakes of SIJS cases, remarkably little empirical research examines the bureaucratic implementation, procedural outcomes, and social effects of the SIJS program. Immigrant youth who apply for SIJS may face discrimination based on age, immigration status, race, class, gender, sexual orientation, and language use. SIJS petitioners are often approaching a formative stage of social development, the transition from childhood to adulthood, which exacerbates the consequences of SIJS delays and outcomes. Moreover, SIJS petitioners are subject to disparities in representation, immigration and criminal enforcement, and access to visas based on national quotas determined by Congress. There is, therefore, an urgent need to understand whether the SIJS program accomplishes its stated goal of protecting children or undermines its humanitarian objectives by exacerbating immigrant children's vulnerability. To address this need, this article presents a systematic study of children seeking SIJS and SIJS-based lawful permanent resident (LPR) status using anonymized case-by-case SIJS data obtained from US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) through the 'Freedom of Information Act'. The data in this article represent 153,374 I-360 petitions for SIJS filed between 2010 and 2021, and 35,651 I-485 LPR applications filed between 2013 and 2021. As a result of this analysis, the article finds that the SIJS program has failed to meet the growing need for fair and timely protection for vulnerable immigrant children. Instead, SIJS petitioners encounter avoidable delays, inconsistent denial rates, and a growing backlog of SIJS petitioners who are already approved for SIJS but whose lives are on hold while they wait for visas to become available. In addition to raising significant concerns about USCIS's management of the SIJS program, these findings have broader implications for how legal scholars conce
ISSN:0016-8092