Loading…

Urethral Injury in Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Study Using Cadaveric Dissection, Imaging Analyses, and Clinical Series

Urethral injuries in men undergoing abdominoperineal resection or TaTME for rectal cancer are uncommon but devastating. The review of images obtained from cadavers and the examination of MRI images of male pelvises allows us to delve deeper into anatomical knowledge in order to achieve a better unde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancers 2023, Vol.15 (20)
Main Authors: Planellas, Pere, Cornejo, Lídia, Ehsan, Aram, Reina, Francisco, Ortega-Torrecilla, Nuria, Maldonado, Eloy, Codina-Cazador, Antoni, Osorio, Margarita, Farrés, Ramon, Carrera, Anna
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 20
container_start_page
container_title Cancers
container_volume 15
creator Planellas, Pere
Cornejo, Lídia
Ehsan, Aram
Reina, Francisco
Ortega-Torrecilla, Nuria
Maldonado, Eloy
Codina-Cazador, Antoni
Osorio, Margarita
Farrés, Ramon
Carrera, Anna
description Urethral injuries in men undergoing abdominoperineal resection or TaTME for rectal cancer are uncommon but devastating. The review of images obtained from cadavers and the examination of MRI images of male pelvises allows us to delve deeper into anatomical knowledge in order to achieve a better understanding and prevent urethral injury during rectal cancer surgery. Measurements have described the critical point for injury lies 2–7.3 cm from the anal margin, with a 0.2–2.3 cm distance between rectum and membranous urethra. Male urethral injury during rectal cancer surgery is rare but significant. Scant information is available about the distances between the rectourethral space and neighboring structures. The aim of this study is to describe the anatomical relations of the male urethra. This three-pronged study included cadaveric dissection, retrospective MRI analysis, and clinical cases. Measurements included the R-Mu distance (shortest distance between the rectum and the membranous urethra), R-Am distance (distance from the anterior rectal wall to anal margin nearest to the membranous urethra), and the anal canal–rectum axis angle. The clinical study analyzed the incidence of urethral injury and associated factors among 244 consecutive men from January 2016 to January 2023. The overall incidence of urethral injury in our series was low (0.73%), but in men with tumors < 10 cm from the anal margin, it was 4% in abdominoperineal resection and 3.2% in TaTME. On preoperative MRI, the median R-Mu distance was 1 cm (IQR, range, 0.2–2.3), the median R-Am distance was 4.3 cm (range, 2–7.3), and the median anorectal angle was 128° (range, 87–160). In the cadaveric study (nine adult male pelvises), the mean R-Mu distance was 1.18 cm (range 0.8–2), and the mean R-Am distance was 2.64 cm (range 2.1–3). Avoiding urethral injury is crucial. The critical point for injury lies 2–7.3 cm from the anal margin, with a 0.2–2.3 cm distance between the rectum and the membranous urethra. Collaborating with anatomists and radiologists improves surgeons’ anatomy knowledge.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/cancers15204955
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A771912732</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A771912732</galeid><sourcerecordid>A771912732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7719127323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjTFPw0AMhU-ISlTQmdU_oC1JrskpbFEA0ZXQuTpdnNRV4qBzUikj_5wDMbDiN9h6z5-t1H0cbbXOowdn2aGXOE2iXZ6mV2qZRCbZZFm-u_4z36iVyDkKpXVsMrNUnweP48nbDvZ8nvwMxPCGbgxG-XMTqsm36OdHKKAc-g-PJ2ShC0I1TvUMByFuw25tL-jJwROJBJ4GXsO-t-13WrDtZkFZg-Uayo6YXHhQBQDlTi0a2wmufvut2r48v5evm9Z2eCRuhtFbF1RjT25gbCj4hTFxHidGJ_rfwBeiN2Bz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Urethral Injury in Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Study Using Cadaveric Dissection, Imaging Analyses, and Clinical Series</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Planellas, Pere ; Cornejo, Lídia ; Ehsan, Aram ; Reina, Francisco ; Ortega-Torrecilla, Nuria ; Maldonado, Eloy ; Codina-Cazador, Antoni ; Osorio, Margarita ; Farrés, Ramon ; Carrera, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Planellas, Pere ; Cornejo, Lídia ; Ehsan, Aram ; Reina, Francisco ; Ortega-Torrecilla, Nuria ; Maldonado, Eloy ; Codina-Cazador, Antoni ; Osorio, Margarita ; Farrés, Ramon ; Carrera, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>Urethral injuries in men undergoing abdominoperineal resection or TaTME for rectal cancer are uncommon but devastating. The review of images obtained from cadavers and the examination of MRI images of male pelvises allows us to delve deeper into anatomical knowledge in order to achieve a better understanding and prevent urethral injury during rectal cancer surgery. Measurements have described the critical point for injury lies 2–7.3 cm from the anal margin, with a 0.2–2.3 cm distance between rectum and membranous urethra. Male urethral injury during rectal cancer surgery is rare but significant. Scant information is available about the distances between the rectourethral space and neighboring structures. The aim of this study is to describe the anatomical relations of the male urethra. This three-pronged study included cadaveric dissection, retrospective MRI analysis, and clinical cases. Measurements included the R-Mu distance (shortest distance between the rectum and the membranous urethra), R-Am distance (distance from the anterior rectal wall to anal margin nearest to the membranous urethra), and the anal canal–rectum axis angle. The clinical study analyzed the incidence of urethral injury and associated factors among 244 consecutive men from January 2016 to January 2023. The overall incidence of urethral injury in our series was low (0.73%), but in men with tumors &lt; 10 cm from the anal margin, it was 4% in abdominoperineal resection and 3.2% in TaTME. On preoperative MRI, the median R-Mu distance was 1 cm (IQR, range, 0.2–2.3), the median R-Am distance was 4.3 cm (range, 2–7.3), and the median anorectal angle was 128° (range, 87–160). In the cadaveric study (nine adult male pelvises), the mean R-Mu distance was 1.18 cm (range 0.8–2), and the mean R-Am distance was 2.64 cm (range 2.1–3). Avoiding urethral injury is crucial. The critical point for injury lies 2–7.3 cm from the anal margin, with a 0.2–2.3 cm distance between the rectum and the membranous urethra. Collaborating with anatomists and radiologists improves surgeons’ anatomy knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Colorectal cancer ; Oncology, Experimental ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2023, Vol.15 (20)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,4476,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Planellas, Pere</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornejo, Lídia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehsan, Aram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reina, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega-Torrecilla, Nuria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maldonado, Eloy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codina-Cazador, Antoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrés, Ramon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrera, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Urethral Injury in Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Study Using Cadaveric Dissection, Imaging Analyses, and Clinical Series</title><title>Cancers</title><description>Urethral injuries in men undergoing abdominoperineal resection or TaTME for rectal cancer are uncommon but devastating. The review of images obtained from cadavers and the examination of MRI images of male pelvises allows us to delve deeper into anatomical knowledge in order to achieve a better understanding and prevent urethral injury during rectal cancer surgery. Measurements have described the critical point for injury lies 2–7.3 cm from the anal margin, with a 0.2–2.3 cm distance between rectum and membranous urethra. Male urethral injury during rectal cancer surgery is rare but significant. Scant information is available about the distances between the rectourethral space and neighboring structures. The aim of this study is to describe the anatomical relations of the male urethra. This three-pronged study included cadaveric dissection, retrospective MRI analysis, and clinical cases. Measurements included the R-Mu distance (shortest distance between the rectum and the membranous urethra), R-Am distance (distance from the anterior rectal wall to anal margin nearest to the membranous urethra), and the anal canal–rectum axis angle. The clinical study analyzed the incidence of urethral injury and associated factors among 244 consecutive men from January 2016 to January 2023. The overall incidence of urethral injury in our series was low (0.73%), but in men with tumors &lt; 10 cm from the anal margin, it was 4% in abdominoperineal resection and 3.2% in TaTME. On preoperative MRI, the median R-Mu distance was 1 cm (IQR, range, 0.2–2.3), the median R-Am distance was 4.3 cm (range, 2–7.3), and the median anorectal angle was 128° (range, 87–160). In the cadaveric study (nine adult male pelvises), the mean R-Mu distance was 1.18 cm (range 0.8–2), and the mean R-Am distance was 2.64 cm (range 2.1–3). Avoiding urethral injury is crucial. The critical point for injury lies 2–7.3 cm from the anal margin, with a 0.2–2.3 cm distance between the rectum and the membranous urethra. Collaborating with anatomists and radiologists improves surgeons’ anatomy knowledge.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVjTFPw0AMhU-ISlTQmdU_oC1JrskpbFEA0ZXQuTpdnNRV4qBzUikj_5wDMbDiN9h6z5-t1H0cbbXOowdn2aGXOE2iXZ6mV2qZRCbZZFm-u_4z36iVyDkKpXVsMrNUnweP48nbDvZ8nvwMxPCGbgxG-XMTqsm36OdHKKAc-g-PJ2ShC0I1TvUMByFuw25tL-jJwROJBJ4GXsO-t-13WrDtZkFZg-Uayo6YXHhQBQDlTi0a2wmufvut2r48v5evm9Z2eCRuhtFbF1RjT25gbCj4hTFxHidGJ_rfwBeiN2Bz</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Planellas, Pere</creator><creator>Cornejo, Lídia</creator><creator>Ehsan, Aram</creator><creator>Reina, Francisco</creator><creator>Ortega-Torrecilla, Nuria</creator><creator>Maldonado, Eloy</creator><creator>Codina-Cazador, Antoni</creator><creator>Osorio, Margarita</creator><creator>Farrés, Ramon</creator><creator>Carrera, Anna</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Urethral Injury in Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Study Using Cadaveric Dissection, Imaging Analyses, and Clinical Series</title><author>Planellas, Pere ; Cornejo, Lídia ; Ehsan, Aram ; Reina, Francisco ; Ortega-Torrecilla, Nuria ; Maldonado, Eloy ; Codina-Cazador, Antoni ; Osorio, Margarita ; Farrés, Ramon ; Carrera, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7719127323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Planellas, Pere</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornejo, Lídia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehsan, Aram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reina, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega-Torrecilla, Nuria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maldonado, Eloy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codina-Cazador, Antoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrés, Ramon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrera, Anna</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Planellas, Pere</au><au>Cornejo, Lídia</au><au>Ehsan, Aram</au><au>Reina, Francisco</au><au>Ortega-Torrecilla, Nuria</au><au>Maldonado, Eloy</au><au>Codina-Cazador, Antoni</au><au>Osorio, Margarita</au><au>Farrés, Ramon</au><au>Carrera, Anna</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Urethral Injury in Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Study Using Cadaveric Dissection, Imaging Analyses, and Clinical Series</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>20</issue><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>Urethral injuries in men undergoing abdominoperineal resection or TaTME for rectal cancer are uncommon but devastating. The review of images obtained from cadavers and the examination of MRI images of male pelvises allows us to delve deeper into anatomical knowledge in order to achieve a better understanding and prevent urethral injury during rectal cancer surgery. Measurements have described the critical point for injury lies 2–7.3 cm from the anal margin, with a 0.2–2.3 cm distance between rectum and membranous urethra. Male urethral injury during rectal cancer surgery is rare but significant. Scant information is available about the distances between the rectourethral space and neighboring structures. The aim of this study is to describe the anatomical relations of the male urethra. This three-pronged study included cadaveric dissection, retrospective MRI analysis, and clinical cases. Measurements included the R-Mu distance (shortest distance between the rectum and the membranous urethra), R-Am distance (distance from the anterior rectal wall to anal margin nearest to the membranous urethra), and the anal canal–rectum axis angle. The clinical study analyzed the incidence of urethral injury and associated factors among 244 consecutive men from January 2016 to January 2023. The overall incidence of urethral injury in our series was low (0.73%), but in men with tumors &lt; 10 cm from the anal margin, it was 4% in abdominoperineal resection and 3.2% in TaTME. On preoperative MRI, the median R-Mu distance was 1 cm (IQR, range, 0.2–2.3), the median R-Am distance was 4.3 cm (range, 2–7.3), and the median anorectal angle was 128° (range, 87–160). In the cadaveric study (nine adult male pelvises), the mean R-Mu distance was 1.18 cm (range 0.8–2), and the mean R-Am distance was 2.64 cm (range 2.1–3). Avoiding urethral injury is crucial. The critical point for injury lies 2–7.3 cm from the anal margin, with a 0.2–2.3 cm distance between the rectum and the membranous urethra. Collaborating with anatomists and radiologists improves surgeons’ anatomy knowledge.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/cancers15204955</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6694
ispartof Cancers, 2023, Vol.15 (20)
issn 2072-6694
2072-6694
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A771912732
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects Cancer
Colorectal cancer
Oncology, Experimental
Surgery
title Urethral Injury in Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Study Using Cadaveric Dissection, Imaging Analyses, and Clinical Series
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T02%3A15%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Urethral%20Injury%20in%20Rectal%20Cancer%20Surgery:%20A%20Comprehensive%20Study%20Using%20Cadaveric%20Dissection,%20Imaging%20Analyses,%20and%20Clinical%20Series&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Planellas,%20Pere&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=20&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers15204955&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA771912732%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7719127323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A771912732&rfr_iscdi=true