Loading…

Vaccine communication training using the Brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunization intervention: A PRISM implementation evaluation

Improving clinician--patient communication can increase uptake of recommended vaccinations during pregnancy. To evaluate adaptations to and pragmatism of the brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunizations (MI4MI) intervention and to use the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainabil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Translational Behavioral Medicine 2024, Vol.14 (5), p.285
Main Authors: Cataldi, Jessica R, Brewer, Sarah E, Perreira, Cathryn, Fisher, Mary E, Spina, Christine I, Cochran, Fiona, Glasgow, Russell E, O'Leary, Sean T
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 285
container_title Translational Behavioral Medicine
container_volume 14
creator Cataldi, Jessica R
Brewer, Sarah E
Perreira, Cathryn
Fisher, Mary E
Spina, Christine I
Cochran, Fiona
Glasgow, Russell E
O'Leary, Sean T
description Improving clinician--patient communication can increase uptake of recommended vaccinations during pregnancy. To evaluate adaptations to and pragmatism of the brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunizations (MI4MI) intervention and to use the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to describe context and implementation outcomes among clinician and staff participants. We incorporated data from study team members, clinicians and staff participants, pregnant patients at participating clinics, and patient medical records. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using surveys, chart reviews, study team notes, interviews, and focus groups. Adaptations were evaluated using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME) and pragmatism was measured with PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS-2). MI4MI was effective at improving participants' vaccine communication experiences. Adoption was limited by our recruitment approach. MI4MI implementation was shaped by contextual factors and associated adaptations related to the COVID pandemic and clinic and participant characteristics. Virtual asynchronous intervention delivery had mixed effects on adoption and implementation that varied across clinics and participants. Participants expressed interest in maintaining the MI4MI intervention moving forward; however, identification of sustainability infrastructure was limited. MI4MI was evaluated to be relatively pragmatic. Contextual factors strongly shaped implementation of MI4MI. Future iterations of MI4MI should include training delivery modes and incentives that accommodate a range of participants across job roles and organizational settings. Future studies including control clinics are needed to measure effectiveness for increasing vaccination and comparing virtual versus hybrid implementation strategies. Lay summary We studied a training program called Brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunizations (MI4MI). This program tried to teach doctors and other healthcare workers how to talk with pregnant people about vaccines. We looked at how this training program worked in different clinics. We talked with and gave surveys to the healthcare workers and patients at clinics who participated in this program. Healthcare workers who completed the MI4MI program had better experiences talking about vaccines after the training. This study happened during the early COVID pandemic, so
doi_str_mv 10.1093/tbm/ibae012
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A794672066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A794672066</galeid><sourcerecordid>A794672066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7946720663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjktOAzEMhrMoEhV0xQV8gbbJtMp0uisIRBcjVYC6rdLUKUZ5oJnMIHEMTkwm5QLYkh-_P1tm7E7wmeDVYh6Pbk5HhVwUIzYWK1lNZSnkNZu07QdPtpSFKMWY_eyV1uQRdHCu86RVpOAhNoo8-TN07RDjO8J9Q2igDpH6zCgLWx-x6Qm_BsaEBmqVhDzJx74vxyhj6IdmDRvYvWxfayD3adEl9QJhr2yXy1t2ZZRtcfKXb9js6fHt4Xl6VhYP5E1I3-nkJ3Skg0dDSd-U1VKWBZdy8e-FX-b-Zm8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Vaccine communication training using the Brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunization intervention: A PRISM implementation evaluation</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Cataldi, Jessica R ; Brewer, Sarah E ; Perreira, Cathryn ; Fisher, Mary E ; Spina, Christine I ; Cochran, Fiona ; Glasgow, Russell E ; O'Leary, Sean T</creator><creatorcontrib>Cataldi, Jessica R ; Brewer, Sarah E ; Perreira, Cathryn ; Fisher, Mary E ; Spina, Christine I ; Cochran, Fiona ; Glasgow, Russell E ; O'Leary, Sean T</creatorcontrib><description>Improving clinician--patient communication can increase uptake of recommended vaccinations during pregnancy. To evaluate adaptations to and pragmatism of the brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunizations (MI4MI) intervention and to use the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to describe context and implementation outcomes among clinician and staff participants. We incorporated data from study team members, clinicians and staff participants, pregnant patients at participating clinics, and patient medical records. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using surveys, chart reviews, study team notes, interviews, and focus groups. Adaptations were evaluated using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME) and pragmatism was measured with PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS-2). MI4MI was effective at improving participants' vaccine communication experiences. Adoption was limited by our recruitment approach. MI4MI implementation was shaped by contextual factors and associated adaptations related to the COVID pandemic and clinic and participant characteristics. Virtual asynchronous intervention delivery had mixed effects on adoption and implementation that varied across clinics and participants. Participants expressed interest in maintaining the MI4MI intervention moving forward; however, identification of sustainability infrastructure was limited. MI4MI was evaluated to be relatively pragmatic. Contextual factors strongly shaped implementation of MI4MI. Future iterations of MI4MI should include training delivery modes and incentives that accommodate a range of participants across job roles and organizational settings. Future studies including control clinics are needed to measure effectiveness for increasing vaccination and comparing virtual versus hybrid implementation strategies. Lay summary We studied a training program called Brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunizations (MI4MI). This program tried to teach doctors and other healthcare workers how to talk with pregnant people about vaccines. We looked at how this training program worked in different clinics. We talked with and gave surveys to the healthcare workers and patients at clinics who participated in this program. Healthcare workers who completed the MI4MI program had better experiences talking about vaccines after the training. This study happened during the early COVID pandemic, so training was done online. Healthcare workers and clinics had mixed responses to the online training approach. COVID made it hard for some people to participate. Many people who did the training said they would like to keep using the MI4MI training and skills in the future. More studies are needed to learn if the MI4MI training increases vaccination rates and to look at ways to improve online training. Keywords: vaccination; pregnancy; maternal immunization; motivational interviewing</description><identifier>ISSN: 1869-6716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibae012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Demographic aspects ; Health aspects ; Immunization ; Pregnant women</subject><ispartof>Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2024, Vol.14 (5), p.285</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Oxford University Press</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,4476,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cataldi, Jessica R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perreira, Cathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spina, Christine I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasgow, Russell E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Sean T</creatorcontrib><title>Vaccine communication training using the Brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunization intervention: A PRISM implementation evaluation</title><title>Translational Behavioral Medicine</title><description>Improving clinician--patient communication can increase uptake of recommended vaccinations during pregnancy. To evaluate adaptations to and pragmatism of the brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunizations (MI4MI) intervention and to use the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to describe context and implementation outcomes among clinician and staff participants. We incorporated data from study team members, clinicians and staff participants, pregnant patients at participating clinics, and patient medical records. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using surveys, chart reviews, study team notes, interviews, and focus groups. Adaptations were evaluated using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME) and pragmatism was measured with PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS-2). MI4MI was effective at improving participants' vaccine communication experiences. Adoption was limited by our recruitment approach. MI4MI implementation was shaped by contextual factors and associated adaptations related to the COVID pandemic and clinic and participant characteristics. Virtual asynchronous intervention delivery had mixed effects on adoption and implementation that varied across clinics and participants. Participants expressed interest in maintaining the MI4MI intervention moving forward; however, identification of sustainability infrastructure was limited. MI4MI was evaluated to be relatively pragmatic. Contextual factors strongly shaped implementation of MI4MI. Future iterations of MI4MI should include training delivery modes and incentives that accommodate a range of participants across job roles and organizational settings. Future studies including control clinics are needed to measure effectiveness for increasing vaccination and comparing virtual versus hybrid implementation strategies. Lay summary We studied a training program called Brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunizations (MI4MI). This program tried to teach doctors and other healthcare workers how to talk with pregnant people about vaccines. We looked at how this training program worked in different clinics. We talked with and gave surveys to the healthcare workers and patients at clinics who participated in this program. Healthcare workers who completed the MI4MI program had better experiences talking about vaccines after the training. This study happened during the early COVID pandemic, so training was done online. Healthcare workers and clinics had mixed responses to the online training approach. COVID made it hard for some people to participate. Many people who did the training said they would like to keep using the MI4MI training and skills in the future. More studies are needed to learn if the MI4MI training increases vaccination rates and to look at ways to improve online training. Keywords: vaccination; pregnancy; maternal immunization; motivational interviewing</description><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><issn>1869-6716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVjktOAzEMhrMoEhV0xQV8gbbJtMp0uisIRBcjVYC6rdLUKUZ5oJnMIHEMTkwm5QLYkh-_P1tm7E7wmeDVYh6Pbk5HhVwUIzYWK1lNZSnkNZu07QdPtpSFKMWY_eyV1uQRdHCu86RVpOAhNoo8-TN07RDjO8J9Q2igDpH6zCgLWx-x6Qm_BsaEBmqVhDzJx74vxyhj6IdmDRvYvWxfayD3adEl9QJhr2yXy1t2ZZRtcfKXb9js6fHt4Xl6VhYP5E1I3-nkJ3Skg0dDSd-U1VKWBZdy8e-FX-b-Zm8</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Cataldi, Jessica R</creator><creator>Brewer, Sarah E</creator><creator>Perreira, Cathryn</creator><creator>Fisher, Mary E</creator><creator>Spina, Christine I</creator><creator>Cochran, Fiona</creator><creator>Glasgow, Russell E</creator><creator>O'Leary, Sean T</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Vaccine communication training using the Brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunization intervention: A PRISM implementation evaluation</title><author>Cataldi, Jessica R ; Brewer, Sarah E ; Perreira, Cathryn ; Fisher, Mary E ; Spina, Christine I ; Cochran, Fiona ; Glasgow, Russell E ; O'Leary, Sean T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7946720663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cataldi, Jessica R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perreira, Cathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spina, Christine I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasgow, Russell E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Sean T</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cataldi, Jessica R</au><au>Brewer, Sarah E</au><au>Perreira, Cathryn</au><au>Fisher, Mary E</au><au>Spina, Christine I</au><au>Cochran, Fiona</au><au>Glasgow, Russell E</au><au>O'Leary, Sean T</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Vaccine communication training using the Brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunization intervention: A PRISM implementation evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Translational Behavioral Medicine</jtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>285</spage><pages>285-</pages><issn>1869-6716</issn><abstract>Improving clinician--patient communication can increase uptake of recommended vaccinations during pregnancy. To evaluate adaptations to and pragmatism of the brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunizations (MI4MI) intervention and to use the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to describe context and implementation outcomes among clinician and staff participants. We incorporated data from study team members, clinicians and staff participants, pregnant patients at participating clinics, and patient medical records. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using surveys, chart reviews, study team notes, interviews, and focus groups. Adaptations were evaluated using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME) and pragmatism was measured with PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS-2). MI4MI was effective at improving participants' vaccine communication experiences. Adoption was limited by our recruitment approach. MI4MI implementation was shaped by contextual factors and associated adaptations related to the COVID pandemic and clinic and participant characteristics. Virtual asynchronous intervention delivery had mixed effects on adoption and implementation that varied across clinics and participants. Participants expressed interest in maintaining the MI4MI intervention moving forward; however, identification of sustainability infrastructure was limited. MI4MI was evaluated to be relatively pragmatic. Contextual factors strongly shaped implementation of MI4MI. Future iterations of MI4MI should include training delivery modes and incentives that accommodate a range of participants across job roles and organizational settings. Future studies including control clinics are needed to measure effectiveness for increasing vaccination and comparing virtual versus hybrid implementation strategies. Lay summary We studied a training program called Brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunizations (MI4MI). This program tried to teach doctors and other healthcare workers how to talk with pregnant people about vaccines. We looked at how this training program worked in different clinics. We talked with and gave surveys to the healthcare workers and patients at clinics who participated in this program. Healthcare workers who completed the MI4MI program had better experiences talking about vaccines after the training. This study happened during the early COVID pandemic, so training was done online. Healthcare workers and clinics had mixed responses to the online training approach. COVID made it hard for some people to participate. Many people who did the training said they would like to keep using the MI4MI training and skills in the future. More studies are needed to learn if the MI4MI training increases vaccination rates and to look at ways to improve online training. Keywords: vaccination; pregnancy; maternal immunization; motivational interviewing</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/tbm/ibae012</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1869-6716
ispartof Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2024, Vol.14 (5), p.285
issn 1869-6716
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A794672066
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Demographic aspects
Health aspects
Immunization
Pregnant women
title Vaccine communication training using the Brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunization intervention: A PRISM implementation evaluation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T08%3A20%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Vaccine%20communication%20training%20using%20the%20Brief%20Motivational%20Interviewing%20for%20Maternal%20Immunization%20intervention:%20A%20PRISM%20implementation%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Translational%20Behavioral%20Medicine&rft.au=Cataldi,%20Jessica%20R&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=285&rft.pages=285-&rft.issn=1869-6716&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/tbm/ibae012&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA794672066%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7946720663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A794672066&rfr_iscdi=true