Loading…

Aerosol beclomethasone dipropionate compared with theophylline as primary treatment of chronic, mild to moderately severe asthma in children

Objective. To compare the benefits and adverse reactions of theophylline and beclomethasone (BDP) in the long-term control of mild to moderate chronic asthma in children. Design. Multicentered, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized, controlled trial. Patients. One hundred ninety-five children bet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 1998-07, Vol.102 (1), p.S265
Main Authors: Tinkelman, David G, Furukawa, Clifton T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page S265
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 102
creator Tinkelman, David G
Furukawa, Clifton T
description Objective. To compare the benefits and adverse reactions of theophylline and beclomethasone (BDP) in the long-term control of mild to moderate chronic asthma in children. Design. Multicentered, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized, controlled trial. Patients. One hundred ninety-five children between the ages of 6 and 16 years with mild to moderate asthma. Intervention. Treatment with either BDP, 84 [micro]g four times a day, or sustained-release theophylline administered twice daily I doses adjusted for optimum control of symptoms. Main Outcome Measures. Daily diary record of symptoms, peak flow rates, supplemental bronchodilator and glucocorticoid treatment, doctor and hospital visits, absence from work and school, and side effects. Results. Aerosol BDP and sustained-release theophylline were effective primary treatments for mild to moderate chronic asthma. BDP resulted in comparable symptom control with less bronchodilator use and fewer courses of systemic steroids than did theophylline. Side effects were observed significantly more frequently with theophylline than with BDP. Growth velocity suppression was noted with BDP and was more pronounced in boys. Suppression was not associated with alterations in cortisol measurements either at baseline or following stimulation. Conclusions. Both theophylline and BDP are effective therapy for mild to moderate asthma. Caution must be used with the administration of BDP in children because of possible growth velocity suppression.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A20930277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A20930277</galeid><sourcerecordid>A20930277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1457-c92dee6dd85d51c0c441473e724568ee31f36178198761240c84bfc672dcb7ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptz81KAzEQB_BFFKzVd8jRQxeSbHazeyxFq1DoRc8lTWZ3I_lYkvjRd_ChjdiDhTKHgeE3w_wvihnBXVsyyuvLYoZxRUqGcX1d3MT4hjFmNaez4nsJwUdv0B6k8RbSKKJ3gJSegp-0dyIBkt5OIoBCnzqNKI3gp_FgjM5ORDQFbUU4oBRAJAsuId8jOQbvtFwgq41CySPrFYR8zBxQhA8Iv6tptAJpl3FGAdxtcdULE-Hu2OfF6-PDy-qp3GzXz6vlphxI_rqUHVUAjVJtrWoisWSMMF4Bp6xuWoCK9FVDeEu6ljeEMixbtu9lw6mSey5FNS8Wf3cHYWCnXe9TEHIAlz80OX2v83hJcVdhynnm5RmeS4HV8py_P_GZJPhKg3iPcdeuNyd0cY5KbwwMsMupV9t__AccqJJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aerosol beclomethasone dipropionate compared with theophylline as primary treatment of chronic, mild to moderately severe asthma in children</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Tinkelman, David G ; Furukawa, Clifton T</creator><creatorcontrib>Tinkelman, David G ; Furukawa, Clifton T</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To compare the benefits and adverse reactions of theophylline and beclomethasone (BDP) in the long-term control of mild to moderate chronic asthma in children. Design. Multicentered, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized, controlled trial. Patients. One hundred ninety-five children between the ages of 6 and 16 years with mild to moderate asthma. Intervention. Treatment with either BDP, 84 [micro]g four times a day, or sustained-release theophylline administered twice daily I doses adjusted for optimum control of symptoms. Main Outcome Measures. Daily diary record of symptoms, peak flow rates, supplemental bronchodilator and glucocorticoid treatment, doctor and hospital visits, absence from work and school, and side effects. Results. Aerosol BDP and sustained-release theophylline were effective primary treatments for mild to moderate chronic asthma. BDP resulted in comparable symptom control with less bronchodilator use and fewer courses of systemic steroids than did theophylline. Side effects were observed significantly more frequently with theophylline than with BDP. Growth velocity suppression was noted with BDP and was more pronounced in boys. Suppression was not associated with alterations in cortisol measurements either at baseline or following stimulation. Conclusions. Both theophylline and BDP are effective therapy for mild to moderate asthma. Caution must be used with the administration of BDP in children because of possible growth velocity suppression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Academy of Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Asthma in children ; Beclomethasone ; Beclomethasone dipropionate ; Childhood asthma ; Drug therapy ; Evaluation ; Theophylline</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 1998-07, Vol.102 (1), p.S265</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1998 American Academy of Pediatrics</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1998 American Academy of Pediatrics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tinkelman, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furukawa, Clifton T</creatorcontrib><title>Aerosol beclomethasone dipropionate compared with theophylline as primary treatment of chronic, mild to moderately severe asthma in children</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>Objective. To compare the benefits and adverse reactions of theophylline and beclomethasone (BDP) in the long-term control of mild to moderate chronic asthma in children. Design. Multicentered, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized, controlled trial. Patients. One hundred ninety-five children between the ages of 6 and 16 years with mild to moderate asthma. Intervention. Treatment with either BDP, 84 [micro]g four times a day, or sustained-release theophylline administered twice daily I doses adjusted for optimum control of symptoms. Main Outcome Measures. Daily diary record of symptoms, peak flow rates, supplemental bronchodilator and glucocorticoid treatment, doctor and hospital visits, absence from work and school, and side effects. Results. Aerosol BDP and sustained-release theophylline were effective primary treatments for mild to moderate chronic asthma. BDP resulted in comparable symptom control with less bronchodilator use and fewer courses of systemic steroids than did theophylline. Side effects were observed significantly more frequently with theophylline than with BDP. Growth velocity suppression was noted with BDP and was more pronounced in boys. Suppression was not associated with alterations in cortisol measurements either at baseline or following stimulation. Conclusions. Both theophylline and BDP are effective therapy for mild to moderate asthma. Caution must be used with the administration of BDP in children because of possible growth velocity suppression.</description><subject>Asthma in children</subject><subject>Beclomethasone</subject><subject>Beclomethasone dipropionate</subject><subject>Childhood asthma</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Theophylline</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptz81KAzEQB_BFFKzVd8jRQxeSbHazeyxFq1DoRc8lTWZ3I_lYkvjRd_ChjdiDhTKHgeE3w_wvihnBXVsyyuvLYoZxRUqGcX1d3MT4hjFmNaez4nsJwUdv0B6k8RbSKKJ3gJSegp-0dyIBkt5OIoBCnzqNKI3gp_FgjM5ORDQFbUU4oBRAJAsuId8jOQbvtFwgq41CySPrFYR8zBxQhA8Iv6tptAJpl3FGAdxtcdULE-Hu2OfF6-PDy-qp3GzXz6vlphxI_rqUHVUAjVJtrWoisWSMMF4Bp6xuWoCK9FVDeEu6ljeEMixbtu9lw6mSey5FNS8Wf3cHYWCnXe9TEHIAlz80OX2v83hJcVdhynnm5RmeS4HV8py_P_GZJPhKg3iPcdeuNyd0cY5KbwwMsMupV9t__AccqJJ0</recordid><startdate>19980701</startdate><enddate>19980701</enddate><creator>Tinkelman, David G</creator><creator>Furukawa, Clifton T</creator><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>8GL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980701</creationdate><title>Aerosol beclomethasone dipropionate compared with theophylline as primary treatment of chronic, mild to moderately severe asthma in children</title><author>Tinkelman, David G ; Furukawa, Clifton T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1457-c92dee6dd85d51c0c441473e724568ee31f36178198761240c84bfc672dcb7ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Asthma in children</topic><topic>Beclomethasone</topic><topic>Beclomethasone dipropionate</topic><topic>Childhood asthma</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Theophylline</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tinkelman, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furukawa, Clifton T</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tinkelman, David G</au><au>Furukawa, Clifton T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aerosol beclomethasone dipropionate compared with theophylline as primary treatment of chronic, mild to moderately severe asthma in children</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>1998-07-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>S265</spage><pages>S265-</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><abstract>Objective. To compare the benefits and adverse reactions of theophylline and beclomethasone (BDP) in the long-term control of mild to moderate chronic asthma in children. Design. Multicentered, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized, controlled trial. Patients. One hundred ninety-five children between the ages of 6 and 16 years with mild to moderate asthma. Intervention. Treatment with either BDP, 84 [micro]g four times a day, or sustained-release theophylline administered twice daily I doses adjusted for optimum control of symptoms. Main Outcome Measures. Daily diary record of symptoms, peak flow rates, supplemental bronchodilator and glucocorticoid treatment, doctor and hospital visits, absence from work and school, and side effects. Results. Aerosol BDP and sustained-release theophylline were effective primary treatments for mild to moderate chronic asthma. BDP resulted in comparable symptom control with less bronchodilator use and fewer courses of systemic steroids than did theophylline. Side effects were observed significantly more frequently with theophylline than with BDP. Growth velocity suppression was noted with BDP and was more pronounced in boys. Suppression was not associated with alterations in cortisol measurements either at baseline or following stimulation. Conclusions. Both theophylline and BDP are effective therapy for mild to moderate asthma. Caution must be used with the administration of BDP in children because of possible growth velocity suppression.</abstract><pub>American Academy of Pediatrics</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 1998-07, Vol.102 (1), p.S265
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A20930277
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Asthma in children
Beclomethasone
Beclomethasone dipropionate
Childhood asthma
Drug therapy
Evaluation
Theophylline
title Aerosol beclomethasone dipropionate compared with theophylline as primary treatment of chronic, mild to moderately severe asthma in children
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A23%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aerosol%20beclomethasone%20dipropionate%20compared%20with%20theophylline%20as%20primary%20treatment%20of%20chronic,%20mild%20to%20moderately%20severe%20asthma%20in%20children&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Tinkelman,%20David%20G&rft.date=1998-07-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=S265&rft.pages=S265-&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA20930277%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1457-c92dee6dd85d51c0c441473e724568ee31f36178198761240c84bfc672dcb7ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A20930277&rfr_iscdi=true