Loading…

Politics, Ethics, and Corporate Policy: U.S. Corporations' 1986 Position Papers on South Africa

This article analyzes 48 position papers U.S. corporations distributed in 1986 to define and defend their presence in South Africa under apartheid. As public state ments about one of the most difficult business and ethical issues ever faced by U.S. corporations, these papers constitute a special mom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of business communication (1973) 2000-10, Vol.37 (4), p.369-406
Main Author: Rivers, William E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-4ad1c4f3ff5d031386bc35c6002d051fe95a064afb408ccabbcb2c56b476ff1b3
cites
container_end_page 406
container_issue 4
container_start_page 369
container_title The Journal of business communication (1973)
container_volume 37
creator Rivers, William E.
description This article analyzes 48 position papers U.S. corporations distributed in 1986 to define and defend their presence in South Africa under apartheid. As public state ments about one of the most difficult business and ethical issues ever faced by U.S. corporations, these papers constitute a special moment in the history of busi ness writing. Unique in its economic, political, and ethical complexity, this situa tion required corporations to depart from traditional ways of making decisions and traditional ways of writing about those decisions. These corporations, all but one signatories to the Sullivan Principles, evolved a unique structure that allowed them to enter the debate on divestiture, yet minimize their rhetorical exposure. The limitations inherent in that new pattern became evident, however, in the mid-1980s as the debate became more intense and frustrating for executives and their corpo rations. The essay also examines the pivotal role of Leon Sullivan, the African American minister who organized these corporations in their anti- apartheid efforts, monitored their efforts, pushed them to do more, served as their rhetorical point man in opposition to divestiture, and helped define them as a discourse community.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/002194360003700403
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A68536935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A68536935</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_002194360003700403</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A68536935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-4ad1c4f3ff5d031386bc35c6002d051fe95a064afb408ccabbcb2c56b476ff1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtrAjEUhUNpodb2D3SVXTeO5j0z3YnYBwgVrOuQySQaGSeSjAv_fTO1dFMpWZzcc79zIbkAPGI0xjjPJwgRXDIqEEI0R4ghegUGmHOSMV6QazDogawnbsFdjLvEJUMMgFz6xnVOxxGcd9tvVW0NZz4cfFCdgX1fn57herwa_9rOt_EJ4rIQqR9dX8OlOpgQYbqt_LHbwqkNTqt7cGNVE83Djw7B-mX-OXvLFh-v77PpItMk513GVI01s9RaXiOKaSEqTblO7yE14tiakiskmLIVQ4XWqqp0RTQXFcuFtbiiQzA6z92oxkjXWt8FpTemNUE1vjXWJXsqCk5FSXnCswt4OrXZO32JJ2deBx9jMFYegturcJIYyX4D8u8GUmhyDkW1MXLnj6FNX_Bf4gtNyIR6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Politics, Ethics, and Corporate Policy: U.S. Corporations' 1986 Position Papers on South Africa</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Rivers, William E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rivers, William E.</creatorcontrib><description>This article analyzes 48 position papers U.S. corporations distributed in 1986 to define and defend their presence in South Africa under apartheid. As public state ments about one of the most difficult business and ethical issues ever faced by U.S. corporations, these papers constitute a special moment in the history of busi ness writing. Unique in its economic, political, and ethical complexity, this situa tion required corporations to depart from traditional ways of making decisions and traditional ways of writing about those decisions. These corporations, all but one signatories to the Sullivan Principles, evolved a unique structure that allowed them to enter the debate on divestiture, yet minimize their rhetorical exposure. The limitations inherent in that new pattern became evident, however, in the mid-1980s as the debate became more intense and frustrating for executives and their corpo rations. The essay also examines the pivotal role of Leon Sullivan, the African American minister who organized these corporations in their anti- apartheid efforts, monitored their efforts, pushed them to do more, served as their rhetorical point man in opposition to divestiture, and helped define them as a discourse community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/002194360003700403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Business communication ; Corporations ; Ethical aspects ; Ethics ; Segregation ; South Africa</subject><ispartof>The Journal of business communication (1973), 2000-10, Vol.37 (4), p.369-406</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 Association for Business Communication</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-4ad1c4f3ff5d031386bc35c6002d051fe95a064afb408ccabbcb2c56b476ff1b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rivers, William E.</creatorcontrib><title>Politics, Ethics, and Corporate Policy: U.S. Corporations' 1986 Position Papers on South Africa</title><title>The Journal of business communication (1973)</title><description>This article analyzes 48 position papers U.S. corporations distributed in 1986 to define and defend their presence in South Africa under apartheid. As public state ments about one of the most difficult business and ethical issues ever faced by U.S. corporations, these papers constitute a special moment in the history of busi ness writing. Unique in its economic, political, and ethical complexity, this situa tion required corporations to depart from traditional ways of making decisions and traditional ways of writing about those decisions. These corporations, all but one signatories to the Sullivan Principles, evolved a unique structure that allowed them to enter the debate on divestiture, yet minimize their rhetorical exposure. The limitations inherent in that new pattern became evident, however, in the mid-1980s as the debate became more intense and frustrating for executives and their corpo rations. The essay also examines the pivotal role of Leon Sullivan, the African American minister who organized these corporations in their anti- apartheid efforts, monitored their efforts, pushed them to do more, served as their rhetorical point man in opposition to divestiture, and helped define them as a discourse community.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Business communication</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Ethical aspects</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Segregation</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><issn>0021-9436</issn><issn>1552-4582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtrAjEUhUNpodb2D3SVXTeO5j0z3YnYBwgVrOuQySQaGSeSjAv_fTO1dFMpWZzcc79zIbkAPGI0xjjPJwgRXDIqEEI0R4ghegUGmHOSMV6QazDogawnbsFdjLvEJUMMgFz6xnVOxxGcd9tvVW0NZz4cfFCdgX1fn57herwa_9rOt_EJ4rIQqR9dX8OlOpgQYbqt_LHbwqkNTqt7cGNVE83Djw7B-mX-OXvLFh-v77PpItMk513GVI01s9RaXiOKaSEqTblO7yE14tiakiskmLIVQ4XWqqp0RTQXFcuFtbiiQzA6z92oxkjXWt8FpTemNUE1vjXWJXsqCk5FSXnCswt4OrXZO32JJ2deBx9jMFYegturcJIYyX4D8u8GUmhyDkW1MXLnj6FNX_Bf4gtNyIR6</recordid><startdate>200010</startdate><enddate>200010</enddate><creator>Rivers, William E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Association for Business Communication</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200010</creationdate><title>Politics, Ethics, and Corporate Policy: U.S. Corporations' 1986 Position Papers on South Africa</title><author>Rivers, William E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-4ad1c4f3ff5d031386bc35c6002d051fe95a064afb408ccabbcb2c56b476ff1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Business communication</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Ethical aspects</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Segregation</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rivers, William E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of business communication (1973)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rivers, William E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Politics, Ethics, and Corporate Policy: U.S. Corporations' 1986 Position Papers on South Africa</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of business communication (1973)</jtitle><date>2000-10</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>369-406</pages><issn>0021-9436</issn><eissn>1552-4582</eissn><abstract>This article analyzes 48 position papers U.S. corporations distributed in 1986 to define and defend their presence in South Africa under apartheid. As public state ments about one of the most difficult business and ethical issues ever faced by U.S. corporations, these papers constitute a special moment in the history of busi ness writing. Unique in its economic, political, and ethical complexity, this situa tion required corporations to depart from traditional ways of making decisions and traditional ways of writing about those decisions. These corporations, all but one signatories to the Sullivan Principles, evolved a unique structure that allowed them to enter the debate on divestiture, yet minimize their rhetorical exposure. The limitations inherent in that new pattern became evident, however, in the mid-1980s as the debate became more intense and frustrating for executives and their corpo rations. The essay also examines the pivotal role of Leon Sullivan, the African American minister who organized these corporations in their anti- apartheid efforts, monitored their efforts, pushed them to do more, served as their rhetorical point man in opposition to divestiture, and helped define them as a discourse community.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/002194360003700403</doi><tpages>38</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9436
ispartof The Journal of business communication (1973), 2000-10, Vol.37 (4), p.369-406
issn 0021-9436
1552-4582
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A68536935
source SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)
subjects Analysis
Business communication
Corporations
Ethical aspects
Ethics
Segregation
South Africa
title Politics, Ethics, and Corporate Policy: U.S. Corporations' 1986 Position Papers on South Africa
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T11%3A47%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Politics,%20Ethics,%20and%20Corporate%20Policy:%20U.S.%20Corporations'%201986%20Position%20Papers%20on%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20business%20communication%20(1973)&rft.au=Rivers,%20William%20E.&rft.date=2000-10&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=369-406&rft.issn=0021-9436&rft.eissn=1552-4582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/002194360003700403&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA68536935%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-4ad1c4f3ff5d031386bc35c6002d051fe95a064afb408ccabbcb2c56b476ff1b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A68536935&rft_sage_id=10.1177_002194360003700403&rfr_iscdi=true