Loading…
Politics, Ethics, and Corporate Policy: U.S. Corporations' 1986 Position Papers on South Africa
This article analyzes 48 position papers U.S. corporations distributed in 1986 to define and defend their presence in South Africa under apartheid. As public state ments about one of the most difficult business and ethical issues ever faced by U.S. corporations, these papers constitute a special mom...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of business communication (1973) 2000-10, Vol.37 (4), p.369-406 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-4ad1c4f3ff5d031386bc35c6002d051fe95a064afb408ccabbcb2c56b476ff1b3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 406 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 369 |
container_title | The Journal of business communication (1973) |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Rivers, William E. |
description | This article analyzes 48 position papers U.S. corporations distributed in 1986 to
define and defend their presence in South Africa under apartheid. As public state
ments about one of the most difficult business and ethical issues ever faced by
U.S. corporations, these papers constitute a special moment in the history of busi
ness writing. Unique in its economic, political, and ethical complexity, this situa
tion required corporations to depart from traditional ways of making decisions
and traditional ways of writing about those decisions. These corporations, all but
one signatories to the Sullivan Principles, evolved a unique structure that allowed
them to enter the debate on divestiture, yet minimize their rhetorical exposure. The
limitations inherent in that new pattern became evident, however, in the mid-1980s
as the debate became more intense and frustrating for executives and their corpo
rations. The essay also examines the pivotal role of Leon Sullivan, the African
American minister who organized these corporations in their anti- apartheid
efforts, monitored their efforts, pushed them to do more, served as their rhetorical
point man in opposition to divestiture, and helped define them as a discourse
community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/002194360003700403 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A68536935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A68536935</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_002194360003700403</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A68536935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-4ad1c4f3ff5d031386bc35c6002d051fe95a064afb408ccabbcb2c56b476ff1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtrAjEUhUNpodb2D3SVXTeO5j0z3YnYBwgVrOuQySQaGSeSjAv_fTO1dFMpWZzcc79zIbkAPGI0xjjPJwgRXDIqEEI0R4ghegUGmHOSMV6QazDogawnbsFdjLvEJUMMgFz6xnVOxxGcd9tvVW0NZz4cfFCdgX1fn57herwa_9rOt_EJ4rIQqR9dX8OlOpgQYbqt_LHbwqkNTqt7cGNVE83Djw7B-mX-OXvLFh-v77PpItMk513GVI01s9RaXiOKaSEqTblO7yE14tiakiskmLIVQ4XWqqp0RTQXFcuFtbiiQzA6z92oxkjXWt8FpTemNUE1vjXWJXsqCk5FSXnCswt4OrXZO32JJ2deBx9jMFYegturcJIYyX4D8u8GUmhyDkW1MXLnj6FNX_Bf4gtNyIR6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Politics, Ethics, and Corporate Policy: U.S. Corporations' 1986 Position Papers on South Africa</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Rivers, William E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rivers, William E.</creatorcontrib><description>This article analyzes 48 position papers U.S. corporations distributed in 1986 to
define and defend their presence in South Africa under apartheid. As public state
ments about one of the most difficult business and ethical issues ever faced by
U.S. corporations, these papers constitute a special moment in the history of busi
ness writing. Unique in its economic, political, and ethical complexity, this situa
tion required corporations to depart from traditional ways of making decisions
and traditional ways of writing about those decisions. These corporations, all but
one signatories to the Sullivan Principles, evolved a unique structure that allowed
them to enter the debate on divestiture, yet minimize their rhetorical exposure. The
limitations inherent in that new pattern became evident, however, in the mid-1980s
as the debate became more intense and frustrating for executives and their corpo
rations. The essay also examines the pivotal role of Leon Sullivan, the African
American minister who organized these corporations in their anti- apartheid
efforts, monitored their efforts, pushed them to do more, served as their rhetorical
point man in opposition to divestiture, and helped define them as a discourse
community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/002194360003700403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Business communication ; Corporations ; Ethical aspects ; Ethics ; Segregation ; South Africa</subject><ispartof>The Journal of business communication (1973), 2000-10, Vol.37 (4), p.369-406</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 Association for Business Communication</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-4ad1c4f3ff5d031386bc35c6002d051fe95a064afb408ccabbcb2c56b476ff1b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rivers, William E.</creatorcontrib><title>Politics, Ethics, and Corporate Policy: U.S. Corporations' 1986 Position Papers on South Africa</title><title>The Journal of business communication (1973)</title><description>This article analyzes 48 position papers U.S. corporations distributed in 1986 to
define and defend their presence in South Africa under apartheid. As public state
ments about one of the most difficult business and ethical issues ever faced by
U.S. corporations, these papers constitute a special moment in the history of busi
ness writing. Unique in its economic, political, and ethical complexity, this situa
tion required corporations to depart from traditional ways of making decisions
and traditional ways of writing about those decisions. These corporations, all but
one signatories to the Sullivan Principles, evolved a unique structure that allowed
them to enter the debate on divestiture, yet minimize their rhetorical exposure. The
limitations inherent in that new pattern became evident, however, in the mid-1980s
as the debate became more intense and frustrating for executives and their corpo
rations. The essay also examines the pivotal role of Leon Sullivan, the African
American minister who organized these corporations in their anti- apartheid
efforts, monitored their efforts, pushed them to do more, served as their rhetorical
point man in opposition to divestiture, and helped define them as a discourse
community.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Business communication</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Ethical aspects</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Segregation</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><issn>0021-9436</issn><issn>1552-4582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtrAjEUhUNpodb2D3SVXTeO5j0z3YnYBwgVrOuQySQaGSeSjAv_fTO1dFMpWZzcc79zIbkAPGI0xjjPJwgRXDIqEEI0R4ghegUGmHOSMV6QazDogawnbsFdjLvEJUMMgFz6xnVOxxGcd9tvVW0NZz4cfFCdgX1fn57herwa_9rOt_EJ4rIQqR9dX8OlOpgQYbqt_LHbwqkNTqt7cGNVE83Djw7B-mX-OXvLFh-v77PpItMk513GVI01s9RaXiOKaSEqTblO7yE14tiakiskmLIVQ4XWqqp0RTQXFcuFtbiiQzA6z92oxkjXWt8FpTemNUE1vjXWJXsqCk5FSXnCswt4OrXZO32JJ2deBx9jMFYegturcJIYyX4D8u8GUmhyDkW1MXLnj6FNX_Bf4gtNyIR6</recordid><startdate>200010</startdate><enddate>200010</enddate><creator>Rivers, William E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Association for Business Communication</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200010</creationdate><title>Politics, Ethics, and Corporate Policy: U.S. Corporations' 1986 Position Papers on South Africa</title><author>Rivers, William E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-4ad1c4f3ff5d031386bc35c6002d051fe95a064afb408ccabbcb2c56b476ff1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Business communication</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Ethical aspects</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Segregation</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rivers, William E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of business communication (1973)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rivers, William E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Politics, Ethics, and Corporate Policy: U.S. Corporations' 1986 Position Papers on South Africa</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of business communication (1973)</jtitle><date>2000-10</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>369-406</pages><issn>0021-9436</issn><eissn>1552-4582</eissn><abstract>This article analyzes 48 position papers U.S. corporations distributed in 1986 to
define and defend their presence in South Africa under apartheid. As public state
ments about one of the most difficult business and ethical issues ever faced by
U.S. corporations, these papers constitute a special moment in the history of busi
ness writing. Unique in its economic, political, and ethical complexity, this situa
tion required corporations to depart from traditional ways of making decisions
and traditional ways of writing about those decisions. These corporations, all but
one signatories to the Sullivan Principles, evolved a unique structure that allowed
them to enter the debate on divestiture, yet minimize their rhetorical exposure. The
limitations inherent in that new pattern became evident, however, in the mid-1980s
as the debate became more intense and frustrating for executives and their corpo
rations. The essay also examines the pivotal role of Leon Sullivan, the African
American minister who organized these corporations in their anti- apartheid
efforts, monitored their efforts, pushed them to do more, served as their rhetorical
point man in opposition to divestiture, and helped define them as a discourse
community.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/002194360003700403</doi><tpages>38</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9436 |
ispartof | The Journal of business communication (1973), 2000-10, Vol.37 (4), p.369-406 |
issn | 0021-9436 1552-4582 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A68536935 |
source | SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate) |
subjects | Analysis Business communication Corporations Ethical aspects Ethics Segregation South Africa |
title | Politics, Ethics, and Corporate Policy: U.S. Corporations' 1986 Position Papers on South Africa |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T11%3A47%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Politics,%20Ethics,%20and%20Corporate%20Policy:%20U.S.%20Corporations'%201986%20Position%20Papers%20on%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20business%20communication%20(1973)&rft.au=Rivers,%20William%20E.&rft.date=2000-10&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=369-406&rft.issn=0021-9436&rft.eissn=1552-4582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/002194360003700403&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA68536935%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-4ad1c4f3ff5d031386bc35c6002d051fe95a064afb408ccabbcb2c56b476ff1b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A68536935&rft_sage_id=10.1177_002194360003700403&rfr_iscdi=true |