Loading…
Securities law - rule 10b-5 - Ninth Circuit effectively eliminates adverse interest exception as a defense to 'fraud on the market' claims
Saved in:
Published in: | Harvard law review 2016-06, p.2273 |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 2273 |
container_title | Harvard law review |
container_volume | |
description | |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A472371977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A472371977</galeid><sourcerecordid>A472371977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1767-a52b41a15a820f2a55ffd62ffe5f0478dc861b68cb55c6410b3364a70902dfa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptz81KAzEUBeBBFKzVdwi4KIKRZH6S6bIUtYWiC7vortzJ3EyjmakkGa2v4FMbqIsWSiAhOd8JyVkySLngdCzF6jwZMMYlLTlfXSZX3r8zxkQm80Hy-4aqdyYY9MTCN6HE9RYJZxUt4ubFdGFDpsap3gSCWqMK5gvtD0FrWtNBiD2ov9B5JNGiQx_dTuFnMNuOQExJjRq7mIctGWkHfU1iEjZIWnAfGEZEWTCtv04uNFiPN__rMFk-PS6nM7p4fZ5PJwvacCkkhSKtcg68gDJlOoWi0LoWaXxaoVkuy1qVgleiVFVRKJHHn2SZyEGyMUtrDdkwud1f24DFten0NjhQrfFqPcllmkk-ljIqekI12KEDu-1Qm3h85B9O-DhqbI06Wbg7KkQTcBca6L1fz2fzY3t_YKvemw59nLxpNsHvKwf8D7MVm9k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Securities law - rule 10b-5 - Ninth Circuit effectively eliminates adverse interest exception as a defense to 'fraud on the market' claims</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Nexis UK</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><identifier>ISSN: 0017-811X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2161-976X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Harvard Law Review Association</publisher><subject>Case notes ; Defense (Criminal procedure) ; Exceptions (Law) ; Securities fraud</subject><ispartof>Harvard law review, 2016-06, p.2273</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Harvard Law Review Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids></links><search><title>Securities law - rule 10b-5 - Ninth Circuit effectively eliminates adverse interest exception as a defense to 'fraud on the market' claims</title><title>Harvard law review</title><subject>Case notes</subject><subject>Defense (Criminal procedure)</subject><subject>Exceptions (Law)</subject><subject>Securities fraud</subject><issn>0017-811X</issn><issn>2161-976X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptz81KAzEUBeBBFKzVdwi4KIKRZH6S6bIUtYWiC7vortzJ3EyjmakkGa2v4FMbqIsWSiAhOd8JyVkySLngdCzF6jwZMMYlLTlfXSZX3r8zxkQm80Hy-4aqdyYY9MTCN6HE9RYJZxUt4ubFdGFDpsap3gSCWqMK5gvtD0FrWtNBiD2ov9B5JNGiQx_dTuFnMNuOQExJjRq7mIctGWkHfU1iEjZIWnAfGEZEWTCtv04uNFiPN__rMFk-PS6nM7p4fZ5PJwvacCkkhSKtcg68gDJlOoWi0LoWaXxaoVkuy1qVgleiVFVRKJHHn2SZyEGyMUtrDdkwud1f24DFten0NjhQrfFqPcllmkk-ljIqekI12KEDu-1Qm3h85B9O-DhqbI06Wbg7KkQTcBca6L1fz2fzY3t_YKvemw59nLxpNsHvKwf8D7MVm9k</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><general>Harvard Law Review Association</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>IHI</scope><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Securities law - rule 10b-5 - Ninth Circuit effectively eliminates adverse interest exception as a defense to 'fraud on the market' claims</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1767-a52b41a15a820f2a55ffd62ffe5f0478dc861b68cb55c6410b3364a70902dfa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Case notes</topic><topic>Defense (Criminal procedure)</topic><topic>Exceptions (Law)</topic><topic>Securities fraud</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: U.S. History</collection><collection>LegalTrac (Gale OneFile) - Law</collection><jtitle>Harvard law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Securities law - rule 10b-5 - Ninth Circuit effectively eliminates adverse interest exception as a defense to 'fraud on the market' claims</atitle><jtitle>Harvard law review</jtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><spage>2273</spage><pages>2273-</pages><issn>0017-811X</issn><eissn>2161-976X</eissn><pub>Harvard Law Review Association</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-811X |
ispartof | Harvard law review, 2016-06, p.2273 |
issn | 0017-811X 2161-976X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A472371977 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Nexis UK; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Case notes Defense (Criminal procedure) Exceptions (Law) Securities fraud |
title | Securities law - rule 10b-5 - Ninth Circuit effectively eliminates adverse interest exception as a defense to 'fraud on the market' claims |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T21%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Securities%20law%20-%20rule%2010b-5%20-%20Ninth%20Circuit%20effectively%20eliminates%20adverse%20interest%20exception%20as%20a%20defense%20to%20'fraud%20on%20the%20market'%20claims&rft.jtitle=Harvard%20law%20review&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.spage=2273&rft.pages=2273-&rft.issn=0017-811X&rft.eissn=2161-976X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA472371977%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1767-a52b41a15a820f2a55ffd62ffe5f0478dc861b68cb55c6410b3364a70902dfa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A472371977&rfr_iscdi=true |