Loading…

Performance evaluation of BD FACSPresto.sup.[TM] point of care CD4 analyzer to enumerate CD4 counts for monitoring HIV infected individuals in Nigeria

Despite the upsurge in support and intervention of donor agencies in HIV care and treatment programing in Sub-Sahara African, antiretroviral (ART) programs are still confronted with access and coverage challenges which influence enrolment of new patients. This study investigated the validity of poin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0178037
Main Authors: Negedu-Momoh, Olubunmi Ruth, Jegede, Feyisayo Ebenezer, Yakubu, Ali, Balogun, Oluseyi, Abdullahi, Musa, Badru, Titilope, Oladele, Edward Adekola, Agbakwuru, Chinedu, Khamofu, Hadiza, Torpey, Kwasi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Despite the upsurge in support and intervention of donor agencies in HIV care and treatment programing in Sub-Sahara African, antiretroviral (ART) programs are still confronted with access and coverage challenges which influence enrolment of new patients. This study investigated the validity of point of care BD FACSPresto.sup.[TM] CD4 analyzer for CD4+ cell count, overall agreement, correlation, sensitivity, and specificity in comparison to a reference standard flow cytometry method. We also assessed the feasibility of use among non-laboratorians. Blood samples from 300 HIV infected individuals were analyzed for CD4+ T cell and CD4%, using finger prick capillary sample from 150 PMTCT clients and 150 ART clients at Murtala Mohammed Specialist Hospital, Kano, Nigeria. Their venous samples were compared on a flow cytometry reference method using BD FACSCount CD4+ count system. The accuracy of the BD FACSPresto machine in comparison to BD FACSCount was evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using STATA (version 12). Bland-Altman method and correlation analysis were used to analyze agreement between both measurements. In addition, sensitivity and specificity of both measurements were determined. Statistical significance was set at p-value
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0178037