Loading…

Clinical evaluation and validation of laboratory methods for the diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection: Culture, polymerase chain reaction

The appropriate use of clinically accurate diagnostic tests is essential for the detection of pertussis, a poorly controlled vaccine-preventable disease. The purpose of this study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of different diagnostic criteria including culture, multi-target polymer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0195979
Main Authors: Lee, Adria D, Cassiday, Pamela K, Pawloski, Lucia C, Tatti, Kathleen M, Martin, Monte D, Briere, Elizabeth C, Tondella, M. Lucia, Martin, Stacey W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page e0195979
container_title PloS one
container_volume 13
creator Lee, Adria D
Cassiday, Pamela K
Pawloski, Lucia C
Tatti, Kathleen M
Martin, Monte D
Briere, Elizabeth C
Tondella, M. Lucia
Martin, Stacey W
description The appropriate use of clinically accurate diagnostic tests is essential for the detection of pertussis, a poorly controlled vaccine-preventable disease. The purpose of this study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of different diagnostic criteria including culture, multi-target polymerase chain reaction (PCR), anti-pertussis toxin IgG (IgG-PT) serology, and the use of a clinical case definition. An additional objective was to describe the optimal timing of specimen collection for the various tests. Clinical specimens were collected from patients with cough illness at seven locations across the United States between 2007 and 2011. Nasopharyngeal and blood specimens were collected from each patient during the enrollment visit. Patients who had been coughing for [less than or equal to] 2 weeks were asked to return in 2-4 weeks for collection of a second, convalescent blood specimen. Sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic test were estimated using three methods-pertussis culture as the "gold standard," composite reference standard analysis (CRS), and latent class analysis (LCA). Overall, 868 patients were enrolled and 13.6% were B. pertussis positive by at least one diagnostic test. In a sample of 545 participants with non-missing data on all four diagnostic criteria, culture was 64.0% sensitive, PCR was 90.6% sensitive, and both were 100% specific by LCA. CRS and LCA methods increased the sensitivity estimates for convalescent serology and the clinical case definition over the culture-based estimates. Culture and PCR were most sensitive when performed during the first two weeks of cough; serology was optimally sensitive after the second week of cough. Timing of specimen collection in relation to onset of illness should be considered when ordering diagnostic tests for pertussis. Consideration should be given to including IgG-PT serology as a confirmatory test in the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) case definition for pertussis.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0195979
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A534577782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534577782</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534577782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1662-6561dc8ff84c4e246f3a1ed535033b18b52003e75dfece71c0fcf26ef4a5382f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKAzEUhgdR8PoGLgKCINiaTCYzU3davIFQ8LYtp8lJJ5JOSpIR-xY-sql10YILOYtz4Tu3P8uOGe0zXrGLd9f5Fmx_7lrsUzYQg2qwle2xAc97ZU759lq8m-2H8E6p4HVZ7mVfQ2taI8ES_ADbQTSuJdAqkjKjVqnTxMLEeYjOL8gMY-NUINp5EhskysC0dcGEJXftvMKI1gKZo49dWNZNq1EuJ12SYWdj5_GczJ1dzNBDQCIbMC3xCD_MYbajwQY8-vUH2evtzcvwvvc4unsYXj32pqws0yuiZErWWteFLDAvSs2BoRJcUM4nrJ6InFKOlVBpN1ZMUi11XqIuIH2ea36QnazmTsHiOJ3oogc5M0GOrwQvRFVVdZ6o_h9UMoUzI5Pc2qT6RsPZRkNiIn7GKSQpxg_PT_9nR2-b7Oka2yDY2ARnu6VkYR38BhK0pTo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical evaluation and validation of laboratory methods for the diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection: Culture, polymerase chain reaction</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lee, Adria D ; Cassiday, Pamela K ; Pawloski, Lucia C ; Tatti, Kathleen M ; Martin, Monte D ; Briere, Elizabeth C ; Tondella, M. Lucia ; Martin, Stacey W</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Adria D ; Cassiday, Pamela K ; Pawloski, Lucia C ; Tatti, Kathleen M ; Martin, Monte D ; Briere, Elizabeth C ; Tondella, M. Lucia ; Martin, Stacey W</creatorcontrib><description>The appropriate use of clinically accurate diagnostic tests is essential for the detection of pertussis, a poorly controlled vaccine-preventable disease. The purpose of this study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of different diagnostic criteria including culture, multi-target polymerase chain reaction (PCR), anti-pertussis toxin IgG (IgG-PT) serology, and the use of a clinical case definition. An additional objective was to describe the optimal timing of specimen collection for the various tests. Clinical specimens were collected from patients with cough illness at seven locations across the United States between 2007 and 2011. Nasopharyngeal and blood specimens were collected from each patient during the enrollment visit. Patients who had been coughing for [less than or equal to] 2 weeks were asked to return in 2-4 weeks for collection of a second, convalescent blood specimen. Sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic test were estimated using three methods-pertussis culture as the "gold standard," composite reference standard analysis (CRS), and latent class analysis (LCA). Overall, 868 patients were enrolled and 13.6% were B. pertussis positive by at least one diagnostic test. In a sample of 545 participants with non-missing data on all four diagnostic criteria, culture was 64.0% sensitive, PCR was 90.6% sensitive, and both were 100% specific by LCA. CRS and LCA methods increased the sensitivity estimates for convalescent serology and the clinical case definition over the culture-based estimates. Culture and PCR were most sensitive when performed during the first two weeks of cough; serology was optimally sensitive after the second week of cough. Timing of specimen collection in relation to onset of illness should be considered when ordering diagnostic tests for pertussis. Consideration should be given to including IgG-PT serology as a confirmatory test in the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) case definition for pertussis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Diagnosis ; Innovations ; Methods ; Molecular diagnostic techniques ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Whooping cough</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0195979</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Adria D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassiday, Pamela K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawloski, Lucia C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatti, Kathleen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Monte D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briere, Elizabeth C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tondella, M. Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Stacey W</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical evaluation and validation of laboratory methods for the diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection: Culture, polymerase chain reaction</title><title>PloS one</title><description>The appropriate use of clinically accurate diagnostic tests is essential for the detection of pertussis, a poorly controlled vaccine-preventable disease. The purpose of this study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of different diagnostic criteria including culture, multi-target polymerase chain reaction (PCR), anti-pertussis toxin IgG (IgG-PT) serology, and the use of a clinical case definition. An additional objective was to describe the optimal timing of specimen collection for the various tests. Clinical specimens were collected from patients with cough illness at seven locations across the United States between 2007 and 2011. Nasopharyngeal and blood specimens were collected from each patient during the enrollment visit. Patients who had been coughing for [less than or equal to] 2 weeks were asked to return in 2-4 weeks for collection of a second, convalescent blood specimen. Sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic test were estimated using three methods-pertussis culture as the "gold standard," composite reference standard analysis (CRS), and latent class analysis (LCA). Overall, 868 patients were enrolled and 13.6% were B. pertussis positive by at least one diagnostic test. In a sample of 545 participants with non-missing data on all four diagnostic criteria, culture was 64.0% sensitive, PCR was 90.6% sensitive, and both were 100% specific by LCA. CRS and LCA methods increased the sensitivity estimates for convalescent serology and the clinical case definition over the culture-based estimates. Culture and PCR were most sensitive when performed during the first two weeks of cough; serology was optimally sensitive after the second week of cough. Timing of specimen collection in relation to onset of illness should be considered when ordering diagnostic tests for pertussis. Consideration should be given to including IgG-PT serology as a confirmatory test in the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) case definition for pertussis.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Molecular diagnostic techniques</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Whooping cough</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtKAzEUhgdR8PoGLgKCINiaTCYzU3davIFQ8LYtp8lJJ5JOSpIR-xY-sql10YILOYtz4Tu3P8uOGe0zXrGLd9f5Fmx_7lrsUzYQg2qwle2xAc97ZU759lq8m-2H8E6p4HVZ7mVfQ2taI8ES_ADbQTSuJdAqkjKjVqnTxMLEeYjOL8gMY-NUINp5EhskysC0dcGEJXftvMKI1gKZo49dWNZNq1EuJ12SYWdj5_GczJ1dzNBDQCIbMC3xCD_MYbajwQY8-vUH2evtzcvwvvc4unsYXj32pqws0yuiZErWWteFLDAvSs2BoRJcUM4nrJ6InFKOlVBpN1ZMUi11XqIuIH2ea36QnazmTsHiOJ3oogc5M0GOrwQvRFVVdZ6o_h9UMoUzI5Pc2qT6RsPZRkNiIn7GKSQpxg_PT_9nR2-b7Oka2yDY2ARnu6VkYR38BhK0pTo</recordid><startdate>20180413</startdate><enddate>20180413</enddate><creator>Lee, Adria D</creator><creator>Cassiday, Pamela K</creator><creator>Pawloski, Lucia C</creator><creator>Tatti, Kathleen M</creator><creator>Martin, Monte D</creator><creator>Briere, Elizabeth C</creator><creator>Tondella, M. Lucia</creator><creator>Martin, Stacey W</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180413</creationdate><title>Clinical evaluation and validation of laboratory methods for the diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection: Culture, polymerase chain reaction</title><author>Lee, Adria D ; Cassiday, Pamela K ; Pawloski, Lucia C ; Tatti, Kathleen M ; Martin, Monte D ; Briere, Elizabeth C ; Tondella, M. Lucia ; Martin, Stacey W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1662-6561dc8ff84c4e246f3a1ed535033b18b52003e75dfece71c0fcf26ef4a5382f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Molecular diagnostic techniques</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Whooping cough</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Adria D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassiday, Pamela K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawloski, Lucia C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatti, Kathleen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Monte D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briere, Elizabeth C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tondella, M. Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Stacey W</creatorcontrib><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Adria D</au><au>Cassiday, Pamela K</au><au>Pawloski, Lucia C</au><au>Tatti, Kathleen M</au><au>Martin, Monte D</au><au>Briere, Elizabeth C</au><au>Tondella, M. Lucia</au><au>Martin, Stacey W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical evaluation and validation of laboratory methods for the diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection: Culture, polymerase chain reaction</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2018-04-13</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0195979</spage><pages>e0195979-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The appropriate use of clinically accurate diagnostic tests is essential for the detection of pertussis, a poorly controlled vaccine-preventable disease. The purpose of this study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of different diagnostic criteria including culture, multi-target polymerase chain reaction (PCR), anti-pertussis toxin IgG (IgG-PT) serology, and the use of a clinical case definition. An additional objective was to describe the optimal timing of specimen collection for the various tests. Clinical specimens were collected from patients with cough illness at seven locations across the United States between 2007 and 2011. Nasopharyngeal and blood specimens were collected from each patient during the enrollment visit. Patients who had been coughing for [less than or equal to] 2 weeks were asked to return in 2-4 weeks for collection of a second, convalescent blood specimen. Sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic test were estimated using three methods-pertussis culture as the "gold standard," composite reference standard analysis (CRS), and latent class analysis (LCA). Overall, 868 patients were enrolled and 13.6% were B. pertussis positive by at least one diagnostic test. In a sample of 545 participants with non-missing data on all four diagnostic criteria, culture was 64.0% sensitive, PCR was 90.6% sensitive, and both were 100% specific by LCA. CRS and LCA methods increased the sensitivity estimates for convalescent serology and the clinical case definition over the culture-based estimates. Culture and PCR were most sensitive when performed during the first two weeks of cough; serology was optimally sensitive after the second week of cough. Timing of specimen collection in relation to onset of illness should be considered when ordering diagnostic tests for pertussis. Consideration should be given to including IgG-PT serology as a confirmatory test in the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) case definition for pertussis.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0195979</doi><tpages>e0195979</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0195979
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A534577782
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Care and treatment
Diagnosis
Innovations
Methods
Molecular diagnostic techniques
Polymerase chain reaction
Whooping cough
title Clinical evaluation and validation of laboratory methods for the diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection: Culture, polymerase chain reaction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A53%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20evaluation%20and%20validation%20of%20laboratory%20methods%20for%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20Bordetella%20pertussis%20infection:%20Culture,%20polymerase%20chain%20reaction&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Lee,%20Adria%20D&rft.date=2018-04-13&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0195979&rft.pages=e0195979-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0195979&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA534577782%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1662-6561dc8ff84c4e246f3a1ed535033b18b52003e75dfece71c0fcf26ef4a5382f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A534577782&rfr_iscdi=true