INTERROGATION OR EXPERIMENTATION? ASSESSING NON-CONSENSUAL HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION DURING THE WAR ON TERROR

The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation has long been considered sacrosanct. It traces its legal roots to the Nuremberg trials although the ethical foundations dig much deeper. It prohibits all forms of medical and scientific experimentation on non-consenting individuals. The pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Duke journal of comparative & international law 2018-09, Vol.29 (1), p.41
Main Author: Aceves, William J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abu Zubaydah
Antiterrorism measures
Coercive interrogation
Ethical aspects
Helplessness (Psychology)
Human psychological experimentation
Human rights
Political aspects
Torture
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title Duke journal of comparative & international law
container_volume 29
creator Aceves, William J
description The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation has long been considered sacrosanct. It traces its legal roots to the Nuremberg trials although the ethical foundations dig much deeper. It prohibits all forms of medical and scientific experimentation on non-consenting individuals. The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation is now well established in both national and international law.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A568404688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A568404688</galeid><sourcerecordid>A568404688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1058-8a15d785e7d3999c59203a26a7697e1a3c435352c7ce49fcd0cf42aedaba202f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzstKxDAUBuAsFBxH3yHgupI2SS8rCTW2hU4iSYvuhpgmpdLpwNT3xzrjRilnceDnO5crsAkRxUGc4PgG3M7zJ0KIUhJuwFCJhislC9ZUUkCpIH9_5aracdGcoyfItOZaV6KAQoogl0JzoVtWw7LdMfHfw-dW_dim5PCNKbgk5wPqDlx7M87u_rdvQfvCm7wMallUOauDfvkxDVIT0i5JqUs6nGWZpVmEsIlik8RZ4kKDLcEU08gm1pHM2w5ZTyLjOvNhIhR5vAUPl729Gd1-mPzx62TsYZjtntE4JYjEabqoYEX1bnInMx4n54cl_uMfV_xSnTsMdmXgG-uBaPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>INTERROGATION OR EXPERIMENTATION? ASSESSING NON-CONSENSUAL HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION DURING THE WAR ON TERROR</title><source>Nexis UK</source><creator>Aceves, William J</creator><creatorcontrib>Aceves, William J</creatorcontrib><description>The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation has long been considered sacrosanct. It traces its legal roots to the Nuremberg trials although the ethical foundations dig much deeper. It prohibits all forms of medical and scientific experimentation on non-consenting individuals. The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation is now well established in both national and international law.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-6736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Duke University, School of Law</publisher><subject>Abu Zubaydah ; Antiterrorism measures ; Coercive interrogation ; Ethical aspects ; Helplessness (Psychology) ; Human psychological experimentation ; Human rights ; Political aspects ; Torture</subject><ispartof>Duke journal of comparative &amp; international law, 2018-09, Vol.29 (1), p.41</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Duke University, School of Law</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aceves, William J</creatorcontrib><title>INTERROGATION OR EXPERIMENTATION? ASSESSING NON-CONSENSUAL HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION DURING THE WAR ON TERROR</title><title>Duke journal of comparative &amp; international law</title><description>The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation has long been considered sacrosanct. It traces its legal roots to the Nuremberg trials although the ethical foundations dig much deeper. It prohibits all forms of medical and scientific experimentation on non-consenting individuals. The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation is now well established in both national and international law.</description><subject>Abu Zubaydah</subject><subject>Antiterrorism measures</subject><subject>Coercive interrogation</subject><subject>Ethical aspects</subject><subject>Helplessness (Psychology)</subject><subject>Human psychological experimentation</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Torture</subject><issn>1053-6736</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptzstKxDAUBuAsFBxH3yHgupI2SS8rCTW2hU4iSYvuhpgmpdLpwNT3xzrjRilnceDnO5crsAkRxUGc4PgG3M7zJ0KIUhJuwFCJhislC9ZUUkCpIH9_5aracdGcoyfItOZaV6KAQoogl0JzoVtWw7LdMfHfw-dW_dim5PCNKbgk5wPqDlx7M87u_rdvQfvCm7wMallUOauDfvkxDVIT0i5JqUs6nGWZpVmEsIlik8RZ4kKDLcEU08gm1pHM2w5ZTyLjOvNhIhR5vAUPl729Gd1-mPzx62TsYZjtntE4JYjEabqoYEX1bnInMx4n54cl_uMfV_xSnTsMdmXgG-uBaPk</recordid><startdate>20180922</startdate><enddate>20180922</enddate><creator>Aceves, William J</creator><general>Duke University, School of Law</general><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180922</creationdate><title>INTERROGATION OR EXPERIMENTATION? ASSESSING NON-CONSENSUAL HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION DURING THE WAR ON TERROR</title><author>Aceves, William J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1058-8a15d785e7d3999c59203a26a7697e1a3c435352c7ce49fcd0cf42aedaba202f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abu Zubaydah</topic><topic>Antiterrorism measures</topic><topic>Coercive interrogation</topic><topic>Ethical aspects</topic><topic>Helplessness (Psychology)</topic><topic>Human psychological experimentation</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Torture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aceves, William J</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>Duke journal of comparative &amp; international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aceves, William J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>INTERROGATION OR EXPERIMENTATION? ASSESSING NON-CONSENSUAL HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION DURING THE WAR ON TERROR</atitle><jtitle>Duke journal of comparative &amp; international law</jtitle><date>2018-09-22</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><pages>41-</pages><issn>1053-6736</issn><abstract>The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation has long been considered sacrosanct. It traces its legal roots to the Nuremberg trials although the ethical foundations dig much deeper. It prohibits all forms of medical and scientific experimentation on non-consenting individuals. The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation is now well established in both national and international law.</abstract><pub>Duke University, School of Law</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-6736
ispartof Duke journal of comparative & international law, 2018-09, Vol.29 (1), p.41
issn 1053-6736
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A568404688
source Nexis UK
subjects Abu Zubaydah
Antiterrorism measures
Coercive interrogation
Ethical aspects
Helplessness (Psychology)
Human psychological experimentation
Human rights
Political aspects
Torture
title INTERROGATION OR EXPERIMENTATION? ASSESSING NON-CONSENSUAL HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION DURING THE WAR ON TERROR
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T12%3A45%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=INTERROGATION%20OR%20EXPERIMENTATION?%20ASSESSING%20NON-CONSENSUAL%20HUMAN%20EXPERIMENTATION%20DURING%20THE%20WAR%20ON%20TERROR&rft.jtitle=Duke%20journal%20of%20comparative%20&%20international%20law&rft.au=Aceves,%20William%20J&rft.date=2018-09-22&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.pages=41-&rft.issn=1053-6736&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA568404688%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1058-8a15d785e7d3999c59203a26a7697e1a3c435352c7ce49fcd0cf42aedaba202f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A568404688&rfr_iscdi=true