Loading…
INTERROGATION OR EXPERIMENTATION? ASSESSING NON-CONSENSUAL HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION DURING THE WAR ON TERROR
The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation has long been considered sacrosanct. It traces its legal roots to the Nuremberg trials although the ethical foundations dig much deeper. It prohibits all forms of medical and scientific experimentation on non-consenting individuals. The pr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Duke journal of comparative & international law 2018-09, Vol.29 (1), p.41 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 41 |
container_title | Duke journal of comparative & international law |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Aceves, William J |
description | The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation has long been considered sacrosanct. It traces its legal roots to the Nuremberg trials although the ethical foundations dig much deeper. It prohibits all forms of medical and scientific experimentation on non-consenting individuals. The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation is now well established in both national and international law. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A568404688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A568404688</galeid><sourcerecordid>A568404688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1058-8a15d785e7d3999c59203a26a7697e1a3c435352c7ce49fcd0cf42aedaba202f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzstKxDAUBuAsFBxH3yHgupI2SS8rCTW2hU4iSYvuhpgmpdLpwNT3xzrjRilnceDnO5crsAkRxUGc4PgG3M7zJ0KIUhJuwFCJhislC9ZUUkCpIH9_5aracdGcoyfItOZaV6KAQoogl0JzoVtWw7LdMfHfw-dW_dim5PCNKbgk5wPqDlx7M87u_rdvQfvCm7wMallUOauDfvkxDVIT0i5JqUs6nGWZpVmEsIlik8RZ4kKDLcEU08gm1pHM2w5ZTyLjOvNhIhR5vAUPl729Gd1-mPzx62TsYZjtntE4JYjEabqoYEX1bnInMx4n54cl_uMfV_xSnTsMdmXgG-uBaPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>INTERROGATION OR EXPERIMENTATION? ASSESSING NON-CONSENSUAL HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION DURING THE WAR ON TERROR</title><source>Nexis UK</source><creator>Aceves, William J</creator><creatorcontrib>Aceves, William J</creatorcontrib><description>The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation has long been considered sacrosanct. It traces its legal roots to the Nuremberg trials although the ethical foundations dig much deeper. It prohibits all forms of medical and scientific experimentation on non-consenting individuals. The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation is now well established in both national and international law.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-6736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Duke University, School of Law</publisher><subject>Abu Zubaydah ; Antiterrorism measures ; Coercive interrogation ; Ethical aspects ; Helplessness (Psychology) ; Human psychological experimentation ; Human rights ; Political aspects ; Torture</subject><ispartof>Duke journal of comparative & international law, 2018-09, Vol.29 (1), p.41</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Duke University, School of Law</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aceves, William J</creatorcontrib><title>INTERROGATION OR EXPERIMENTATION? ASSESSING NON-CONSENSUAL HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION DURING THE WAR ON TERROR</title><title>Duke journal of comparative & international law</title><description>The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation has long been considered sacrosanct. It traces its legal roots to the Nuremberg trials although the ethical foundations dig much deeper. It prohibits all forms of medical and scientific experimentation on non-consenting individuals. The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation is now well established in both national and international law.</description><subject>Abu Zubaydah</subject><subject>Antiterrorism measures</subject><subject>Coercive interrogation</subject><subject>Ethical aspects</subject><subject>Helplessness (Psychology)</subject><subject>Human psychological experimentation</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Torture</subject><issn>1053-6736</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptzstKxDAUBuAsFBxH3yHgupI2SS8rCTW2hU4iSYvuhpgmpdLpwNT3xzrjRilnceDnO5crsAkRxUGc4PgG3M7zJ0KIUhJuwFCJhislC9ZUUkCpIH9_5aracdGcoyfItOZaV6KAQoogl0JzoVtWw7LdMfHfw-dW_dim5PCNKbgk5wPqDlx7M87u_rdvQfvCm7wMallUOauDfvkxDVIT0i5JqUs6nGWZpVmEsIlik8RZ4kKDLcEU08gm1pHM2w5ZTyLjOvNhIhR5vAUPl729Gd1-mPzx62TsYZjtntE4JYjEabqoYEX1bnInMx4n54cl_uMfV_xSnTsMdmXgG-uBaPk</recordid><startdate>20180922</startdate><enddate>20180922</enddate><creator>Aceves, William J</creator><general>Duke University, School of Law</general><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180922</creationdate><title>INTERROGATION OR EXPERIMENTATION? ASSESSING NON-CONSENSUAL HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION DURING THE WAR ON TERROR</title><author>Aceves, William J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1058-8a15d785e7d3999c59203a26a7697e1a3c435352c7ce49fcd0cf42aedaba202f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abu Zubaydah</topic><topic>Antiterrorism measures</topic><topic>Coercive interrogation</topic><topic>Ethical aspects</topic><topic>Helplessness (Psychology)</topic><topic>Human psychological experimentation</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Torture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aceves, William J</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>Duke journal of comparative & international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aceves, William J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>INTERROGATION OR EXPERIMENTATION? ASSESSING NON-CONSENSUAL HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION DURING THE WAR ON TERROR</atitle><jtitle>Duke journal of comparative & international law</jtitle><date>2018-09-22</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><pages>41-</pages><issn>1053-6736</issn><abstract>The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation has long been considered sacrosanct. It traces its legal roots to the Nuremberg trials although the ethical foundations dig much deeper. It prohibits all forms of medical and scientific experimentation on non-consenting individuals. The prohibition against non-consensual human experimentation is now well established in both national and international law.</abstract><pub>Duke University, School of Law</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-6736 |
ispartof | Duke journal of comparative & international law, 2018-09, Vol.29 (1), p.41 |
issn | 1053-6736 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A568404688 |
source | Nexis UK |
subjects | Abu Zubaydah Antiterrorism measures Coercive interrogation Ethical aspects Helplessness (Psychology) Human psychological experimentation Human rights Political aspects Torture |
title | INTERROGATION OR EXPERIMENTATION? ASSESSING NON-CONSENSUAL HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION DURING THE WAR ON TERROR |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T12%3A45%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=INTERROGATION%20OR%20EXPERIMENTATION?%20ASSESSING%20NON-CONSENSUAL%20HUMAN%20EXPERIMENTATION%20DURING%20THE%20WAR%20ON%20TERROR&rft.jtitle=Duke%20journal%20of%20comparative%20&%20international%20law&rft.au=Aceves,%20William%20J&rft.date=2018-09-22&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.pages=41-&rft.issn=1053-6736&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA568404688%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1058-8a15d785e7d3999c59203a26a7697e1a3c435352c7ce49fcd0cf42aedaba202f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A568404688&rfr_iscdi=true |