Loading…

Febrile neutropenia FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study

Purpose Prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia (FN) is recommended for the duration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in high-risk patients; yet, granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) discontinuation occurs frequently in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to investigate the incid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Supportive care in cancer 2019-04, Vol.27 (4), p.1449
Main Authors: Salmon, Jean Paul, Smakal, Ma, Karanikiotis, Charisios, Wojtukiewicz, Marek Z, Omnes, Yohann, DeCosta, Lucy, Wetten, Sally
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1449
container_title Supportive care in cancer
container_volume 27
creator Salmon, Jean Paul
Smakal, Ma
Karanikiotis, Charisios
Wojtukiewicz, Marek Z
Omnes, Yohann
DeCosta, Lucy
Wetten, Sally
description Purpose Prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia (FN) is recommended for the duration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in high-risk patients; yet, granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) discontinuation occurs frequently in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of FN in real-world settings and the extent and impact of early pegfilgrastim discontinuation. Methods This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with any-stage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or breast cancer initiating a new chemotherapy course with a high (> 20%) FN risk, with pegfilgrastim in cycle 1. During routine clinical visits, data were collected on FN events, discontinuation of pegfilgrastim (defined as administration of G-CSF other than pegfilgrastim for [greater than or equal to] 1 cycle) and all G-CSF (and reasons), neutropenic complications and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Results Overall, 943 patients were enrolled; 844 met the eligibility criteria (full analysis set) and 814 (86%) completed the study. Twenty-eight patients (3%) had 31 FN events (NHL, n = 17; breast cancer, n = 11). Twenty-six patients (3%) discontinued pegfilgrastim. Forty-four patients (5%) discontinued G-CSF. The most common reason for pegfilgrastim discontinuation was physician preference for daily G-CSF (n = 14 [2%]), and for discontinuation of all G-CSFs was reduced FN risk (n = 14 [2%]). Patients who continued G-CSF prophylaxis were less likely to experience neutropenic complications (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.26 [0.09-0.80]). Suspected ADRs to pegfilgrastim occurred in 43 patients (5%) and serious ADRs in 5 (1%). Conclusions FN rates were consistent with previous reports with pegfilgrastim in clinical practice. No new ADRs were observed. G-CSF discontinuation was uncommon but appeared to increase the likelihood of neutropenic complications.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00520-018-4473-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A576104155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A576104155</galeid><sourcerecordid>A576104155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g675-3ae6f14b833fe824a0f823059921a48e7a1f5f920b473f07880096aecf6d51453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkDFPwzAUhD2ARCn8ADZLzC7PsR07bFVFAamCpQNb5aTPrSGJI9up6L-nCAYGdMMt3510R8gNhxkH0HcJQBXAgBsmpRbs84xMoJKcSaHUBblM6R2Aa62KCXlbYh19i7THMccwYO8tXb6w6NMHbfbYhbzHaIfjPY2YxjYn6mLoqKVDDGnAJvsD0lAnjAebfehtS1Met8crcu5sm_D616dkvXxYL57Y6vXxeTFfsV2pFRMWS8dlbYRwaAppwZlCgKqqgltpUFvulKsKqE9DHGhjAKrSYuPKreJSiSm5_and2RY3vnchR9t0PjWbudIlB8nVNzX7hzppi51vQo_udMHfwBdbXmH_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Febrile neutropenia FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><creator>Salmon, Jean Paul ; Smakal, Ma ; Karanikiotis, Charisios ; Wojtukiewicz, Marek Z ; Omnes, Yohann ; DeCosta, Lucy ; Wetten, Sally</creator><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Jean Paul ; Smakal, Ma ; Karanikiotis, Charisios ; Wojtukiewicz, Marek Z ; Omnes, Yohann ; DeCosta, Lucy ; Wetten, Sally</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia (FN) is recommended for the duration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in high-risk patients; yet, granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) discontinuation occurs frequently in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of FN in real-world settings and the extent and impact of early pegfilgrastim discontinuation. Methods This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with any-stage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or breast cancer initiating a new chemotherapy course with a high (&gt; 20%) FN risk, with pegfilgrastim in cycle 1. During routine clinical visits, data were collected on FN events, discontinuation of pegfilgrastim (defined as administration of G-CSF other than pegfilgrastim for [greater than or equal to] 1 cycle) and all G-CSF (and reasons), neutropenic complications and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Results Overall, 943 patients were enrolled; 844 met the eligibility criteria (full analysis set) and 814 (86%) completed the study. Twenty-eight patients (3%) had 31 FN events (NHL, n = 17; breast cancer, n = 11). Twenty-six patients (3%) discontinued pegfilgrastim. Forty-four patients (5%) discontinued G-CSF. The most common reason for pegfilgrastim discontinuation was physician preference for daily G-CSF (n = 14 [2%]), and for discontinuation of all G-CSFs was reduced FN risk (n = 14 [2%]). Patients who continued G-CSF prophylaxis were less likely to experience neutropenic complications (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.26 [0.09-0.80]). Suspected ADRs to pegfilgrastim occurred in 43 patients (5%) and serious ADRs in 5 (1%). Conclusions FN rates were consistent with previous reports with pegfilgrastim in clinical practice. No new ADRs were observed. G-CSF discontinuation was uncommon but appeared to increase the likelihood of neutropenic complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4473-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Neutropenia ; Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2019-04, Vol.27 (4), p.1449</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Jean Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smakal, Ma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karanikiotis, Charisios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojtukiewicz, Marek Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omnes, Yohann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeCosta, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetten, Sally</creatorcontrib><title>Febrile neutropenia FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><description>Purpose Prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia (FN) is recommended for the duration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in high-risk patients; yet, granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) discontinuation occurs frequently in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of FN in real-world settings and the extent and impact of early pegfilgrastim discontinuation. Methods This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with any-stage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or breast cancer initiating a new chemotherapy course with a high (&gt; 20%) FN risk, with pegfilgrastim in cycle 1. During routine clinical visits, data were collected on FN events, discontinuation of pegfilgrastim (defined as administration of G-CSF other than pegfilgrastim for [greater than or equal to] 1 cycle) and all G-CSF (and reasons), neutropenic complications and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Results Overall, 943 patients were enrolled; 844 met the eligibility criteria (full analysis set) and 814 (86%) completed the study. Twenty-eight patients (3%) had 31 FN events (NHL, n = 17; breast cancer, n = 11). Twenty-six patients (3%) discontinued pegfilgrastim. Forty-four patients (5%) discontinued G-CSF. The most common reason for pegfilgrastim discontinuation was physician preference for daily G-CSF (n = 14 [2%]), and for discontinuation of all G-CSFs was reduced FN risk (n = 14 [2%]). Patients who continued G-CSF prophylaxis were less likely to experience neutropenic complications (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.26 [0.09-0.80]). Suspected ADRs to pegfilgrastim occurred in 43 patients (5%) and serious ADRs in 5 (1%). Conclusions FN rates were consistent with previous reports with pegfilgrastim in clinical practice. No new ADRs were observed. G-CSF discontinuation was uncommon but appeared to increase the likelihood of neutropenic complications.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Neutropenia</subject><subject>Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptkDFPwzAUhD2ARCn8ADZLzC7PsR07bFVFAamCpQNb5aTPrSGJI9up6L-nCAYGdMMt3510R8gNhxkH0HcJQBXAgBsmpRbs84xMoJKcSaHUBblM6R2Aa62KCXlbYh19i7THMccwYO8tXb6w6NMHbfbYhbzHaIfjPY2YxjYn6mLoqKVDDGnAJvsD0lAnjAebfehtS1Met8crcu5sm_D616dkvXxYL57Y6vXxeTFfsV2pFRMWS8dlbYRwaAppwZlCgKqqgltpUFvulKsKqE9DHGhjAKrSYuPKreJSiSm5_and2RY3vnchR9t0PjWbudIlB8nVNzX7hzppi51vQo_udMHfwBdbXmH_</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Salmon, Jean Paul</creator><creator>Smakal, Ma</creator><creator>Karanikiotis, Charisios</creator><creator>Wojtukiewicz, Marek Z</creator><creator>Omnes, Yohann</creator><creator>DeCosta, Lucy</creator><creator>Wetten, Sally</creator><general>Springer</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Febrile neutropenia FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study</title><author>Salmon, Jean Paul ; Smakal, Ma ; Karanikiotis, Charisios ; Wojtukiewicz, Marek Z ; Omnes, Yohann ; DeCosta, Lucy ; Wetten, Sally</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g675-3ae6f14b833fe824a0f823059921a48e7a1f5f920b473f07880096aecf6d51453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Neutropenia</topic><topic>Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Jean Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smakal, Ma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karanikiotis, Charisios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojtukiewicz, Marek Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omnes, Yohann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeCosta, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetten, Sally</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salmon, Jean Paul</au><au>Smakal, Ma</au><au>Karanikiotis, Charisios</au><au>Wojtukiewicz, Marek Z</au><au>Omnes, Yohann</au><au>DeCosta, Lucy</au><au>Wetten, Sally</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Febrile neutropenia FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1449</spage><pages>1449-</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><abstract>Purpose Prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia (FN) is recommended for the duration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in high-risk patients; yet, granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) discontinuation occurs frequently in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of FN in real-world settings and the extent and impact of early pegfilgrastim discontinuation. Methods This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with any-stage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or breast cancer initiating a new chemotherapy course with a high (&gt; 20%) FN risk, with pegfilgrastim in cycle 1. During routine clinical visits, data were collected on FN events, discontinuation of pegfilgrastim (defined as administration of G-CSF other than pegfilgrastim for [greater than or equal to] 1 cycle) and all G-CSF (and reasons), neutropenic complications and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Results Overall, 943 patients were enrolled; 844 met the eligibility criteria (full analysis set) and 814 (86%) completed the study. Twenty-eight patients (3%) had 31 FN events (NHL, n = 17; breast cancer, n = 11). Twenty-six patients (3%) discontinued pegfilgrastim. Forty-four patients (5%) discontinued G-CSF. The most common reason for pegfilgrastim discontinuation was physician preference for daily G-CSF (n = 14 [2%]), and for discontinuation of all G-CSFs was reduced FN risk (n = 14 [2%]). Patients who continued G-CSF prophylaxis were less likely to experience neutropenic complications (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.26 [0.09-0.80]). Suspected ADRs to pegfilgrastim occurred in 43 patients (5%) and serious ADRs in 5 (1%). Conclusions FN rates were consistent with previous reports with pegfilgrastim in clinical practice. No new ADRs were observed. G-CSF discontinuation was uncommon but appeared to increase the likelihood of neutropenic complications.</abstract><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s00520-018-4473-x</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-4355
ispartof Supportive care in cancer, 2019-04, Vol.27 (4), p.1449
issn 0941-4355
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A576104155
source Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; Sociology Collection
subjects Breast cancer
Neutropenia
Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas
title Febrile neutropenia FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A20%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Febrile%20neutropenia%20FN-risk%20chemotherapy:%20results%20from%20a%20prospective%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Salmon,%20Jean%20Paul&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1449&rft.pages=1449-&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-018-4473-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA576104155%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g675-3ae6f14b833fe824a0f823059921a48e7a1f5f920b473f07880096aecf6d51453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A576104155&rfr_iscdi=true