Loading…

Smile analysis: A comparison between photographic and videographic methods

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the differences between the spontaneous smile captured by conventional photography and the video clip method. Methods: A digital video camera was used to capture smiles in 100 subjects using the static and videographic methods. Results: Measurements of the anterio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society 2016-01, Vol.50 (1), p.8-13
Main Authors: Singh, Nandini, Abdulla, Roopa, Sable, Ravindranath, Bhosale, Veera, Halli, Rajshekhar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 8
container_title Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society
container_volume 50
creator Singh, Nandini
Abdulla, Roopa
Sable, Ravindranath
Bhosale, Veera
Halli, Rajshekhar
description Objectives: To evaluate and compare the differences between the spontaneous smile captured by conventional photography and the video clip method. Methods: A digital video camera was used to capture smiles in 100 subjects using the static and videographic methods. Results: Measurements of the anterior and posterior height of the smile, interlabial gap, lower incisal display and eye wink on photographs obtained by the two methods showed considerable differences. Except for the anterior and posterior height of the smile in girls, these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.005). The majority of subjects showed parallel smile arcs back to the maxillary second premolar though differences existed between the two methods. Conclusions: In orthodontic treatment planning, certain treatment modalities (in particular intrusion and expansion) are based on an analysis of the full spontaneous smile. Since the videographic method is better able to capture this smile, it may be a preferred method of obtaining pretreatment facial photographs.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0974909820160103
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A581017772</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A581017772</galeid><sourcerecordid>A581017772</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c209s-edb38b1264fb4a3cfce2f9c917c46bbc96444a9de227568cb84a4748e2f00bd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9LwzAUx4soOObuHgueO1_StGm9jeH8wcCDeg5p-rrFtU1JqmX_vanTgSI5vPDl833wPkFwSWBOCOfXkHOWQ55RICkQiE-CyRhFY3bq_zGQKOGMngcz594AgFASA8smweNzo2sMZSvrvdPuJlyEyjSdtNqZNiywHxDbsNua3mys7LZaebYMP3SJx6DBfmtKdxGcVbJ2OPue0-B1dfuyvI_WT3cPy8U6UhRyF2FZxFlBaMqqgslYVQpplauccMXSolB5yhiTeYmU8iTNVJExyTjLPAVQlBBPg6vD3o2sUei2Mr2VqtFOiUWSEfBCOPXU_B_KvxIbrUyLlb_7dwEOBWWNcxYr0VndSLsXBMRoWfy17CurQ2UwdY_W7er3Aa1osNy1Zhh7zGPiqF8QnnBIRCa-rIsf6_Enx4CFog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smile analysis: A comparison between photographic and videographic methods</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><creator>Singh, Nandini ; Abdulla, Roopa ; Sable, Ravindranath ; Bhosale, Veera ; Halli, Rajshekhar</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Nandini ; Abdulla, Roopa ; Sable, Ravindranath ; Bhosale, Veera ; Halli, Rajshekhar</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To evaluate and compare the differences between the spontaneous smile captured by conventional photography and the video clip method. Methods: A digital video camera was used to capture smiles in 100 subjects using the static and videographic methods. Results: Measurements of the anterior and posterior height of the smile, interlabial gap, lower incisal display and eye wink on photographs obtained by the two methods showed considerable differences. Except for the anterior and posterior height of the smile in girls, these differences were statistically significant (P &lt; 0.005). The majority of subjects showed parallel smile arcs back to the maxillary second premolar though differences existed between the two methods. Conclusions: In orthodontic treatment planning, certain treatment modalities (in particular intrusion and expansion) are based on an analysis of the full spontaneous smile. Since the videographic method is better able to capture this smile, it may be a preferred method of obtaining pretreatment facial photographs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-5742</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-9098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0974909820160103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Publications</publisher><subject>Digital photography ; Digital video ; Displays (Marketing) ; Internet videos ; Methods ; Photography</subject><ispartof>Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 2016-01, Vol.50 (1), p.8-13</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Nandini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulla, Roopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sable, Ravindranath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhosale, Veera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halli, Rajshekhar</creatorcontrib><title>Smile analysis: A comparison between photographic and videographic methods</title><title>Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society</title><description>Objectives: To evaluate and compare the differences between the spontaneous smile captured by conventional photography and the video clip method. Methods: A digital video camera was used to capture smiles in 100 subjects using the static and videographic methods. Results: Measurements of the anterior and posterior height of the smile, interlabial gap, lower incisal display and eye wink on photographs obtained by the two methods showed considerable differences. Except for the anterior and posterior height of the smile in girls, these differences were statistically significant (P &lt; 0.005). The majority of subjects showed parallel smile arcs back to the maxillary second premolar though differences existed between the two methods. Conclusions: In orthodontic treatment planning, certain treatment modalities (in particular intrusion and expansion) are based on an analysis of the full spontaneous smile. Since the videographic method is better able to capture this smile, it may be a preferred method of obtaining pretreatment facial photographs.</description><subject>Digital photography</subject><subject>Digital video</subject><subject>Displays (Marketing)</subject><subject>Internet videos</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Photography</subject><issn>0301-5742</issn><issn>0974-9098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM9LwzAUx4soOObuHgueO1_StGm9jeH8wcCDeg5p-rrFtU1JqmX_vanTgSI5vPDl833wPkFwSWBOCOfXkHOWQ55RICkQiE-CyRhFY3bq_zGQKOGMngcz594AgFASA8smweNzo2sMZSvrvdPuJlyEyjSdtNqZNiywHxDbsNua3mys7LZaebYMP3SJx6DBfmtKdxGcVbJ2OPue0-B1dfuyvI_WT3cPy8U6UhRyF2FZxFlBaMqqgslYVQpplauccMXSolB5yhiTeYmU8iTNVJExyTjLPAVQlBBPg6vD3o2sUei2Mr2VqtFOiUWSEfBCOPXU_B_KvxIbrUyLlb_7dwEOBWWNcxYr0VndSLsXBMRoWfy17CurQ2UwdY_W7er3Aa1osNy1Zhh7zGPiqF8QnnBIRCa-rIsf6_Enx4CFog</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Singh, Nandini</creator><creator>Abdulla, Roopa</creator><creator>Sable, Ravindranath</creator><creator>Bhosale, Veera</creator><creator>Halli, Rajshekhar</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Publications</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Smile analysis: A comparison between photographic and videographic methods</title><author>Singh, Nandini ; Abdulla, Roopa ; Sable, Ravindranath ; Bhosale, Veera ; Halli, Rajshekhar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c209s-edb38b1264fb4a3cfce2f9c917c46bbc96444a9de227568cb84a4748e2f00bd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Digital photography</topic><topic>Digital video</topic><topic>Displays (Marketing)</topic><topic>Internet videos</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Photography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Nandini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulla, Roopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sable, Ravindranath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhosale, Veera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halli, Rajshekhar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Nandini</au><au>Abdulla, Roopa</au><au>Sable, Ravindranath</au><au>Bhosale, Veera</au><au>Halli, Rajshekhar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smile analysis: A comparison between photographic and videographic methods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>8-13</pages><issn>0301-5742</issn><eissn>0974-9098</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To evaluate and compare the differences between the spontaneous smile captured by conventional photography and the video clip method. Methods: A digital video camera was used to capture smiles in 100 subjects using the static and videographic methods. Results: Measurements of the anterior and posterior height of the smile, interlabial gap, lower incisal display and eye wink on photographs obtained by the two methods showed considerable differences. Except for the anterior and posterior height of the smile in girls, these differences were statistically significant (P &lt; 0.005). The majority of subjects showed parallel smile arcs back to the maxillary second premolar though differences existed between the two methods. Conclusions: In orthodontic treatment planning, certain treatment modalities (in particular intrusion and expansion) are based on an analysis of the full spontaneous smile. Since the videographic method is better able to capture this smile, it may be a preferred method of obtaining pretreatment facial photographs.</abstract><pub>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0974909820160103</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-5742
ispartof Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 2016-01, Vol.50 (1), p.8-13
issn 0301-5742
0974-9098
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A581017772
source SAGE Open Access
subjects Digital photography
Digital video
Displays (Marketing)
Internet videos
Methods
Photography
title Smile analysis: A comparison between photographic and videographic methods
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A40%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smile%20analysis:%20A%20comparison%20between%20photographic%20and%20videographic%20methods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Indian%20Orthodontic%20Society&rft.au=Singh,%20Nandini&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=8-13&rft.issn=0301-5742&rft.eissn=0974-9098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0974909820160103&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA581017772%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c209s-edb38b1264fb4a3cfce2f9c917c46bbc96444a9de227568cb84a4748e2f00bd03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A581017772&rfr_iscdi=true