Loading…
Smile analysis: A comparison between photographic and videographic methods
Objectives: To evaluate and compare the differences between the spontaneous smile captured by conventional photography and the video clip method. Methods: A digital video camera was used to capture smiles in 100 subjects using the static and videographic methods. Results: Measurements of the anterio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society 2016-01, Vol.50 (1), p.8-13 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 13 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 8 |
container_title | Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Singh, Nandini Abdulla, Roopa Sable, Ravindranath Bhosale, Veera Halli, Rajshekhar |
description | Objectives: To evaluate and compare the differences between the spontaneous smile captured by conventional photography and the video clip method. Methods: A digital video camera was used to capture smiles in 100 subjects using the static and videographic methods. Results: Measurements of the anterior and posterior height of the smile, interlabial gap, lower incisal display and eye wink on photographs obtained by the two methods showed considerable differences. Except for the anterior and posterior height of the smile in girls, these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.005). The majority of subjects showed parallel smile arcs back to the maxillary second premolar though differences existed between the two methods. Conclusions: In orthodontic treatment planning, certain treatment modalities (in particular intrusion and expansion) are based on an analysis of the full spontaneous smile. Since the videographic method is better able to capture this smile, it may be a preferred method of obtaining pretreatment facial photographs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0974909820160103 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A581017772</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A581017772</galeid><sourcerecordid>A581017772</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c209s-edb38b1264fb4a3cfce2f9c917c46bbc96444a9de227568cb84a4748e2f00bd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9LwzAUx4soOObuHgueO1_StGm9jeH8wcCDeg5p-rrFtU1JqmX_vanTgSI5vPDl833wPkFwSWBOCOfXkHOWQ55RICkQiE-CyRhFY3bq_zGQKOGMngcz594AgFASA8smweNzo2sMZSvrvdPuJlyEyjSdtNqZNiywHxDbsNua3mys7LZaebYMP3SJx6DBfmtKdxGcVbJ2OPue0-B1dfuyvI_WT3cPy8U6UhRyF2FZxFlBaMqqgslYVQpplauccMXSolB5yhiTeYmU8iTNVJExyTjLPAVQlBBPg6vD3o2sUei2Mr2VqtFOiUWSEfBCOPXU_B_KvxIbrUyLlb_7dwEOBWWNcxYr0VndSLsXBMRoWfy17CurQ2UwdY_W7er3Aa1osNy1Zhh7zGPiqF8QnnBIRCa-rIsf6_Enx4CFog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smile analysis: A comparison between photographic and videographic methods</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><creator>Singh, Nandini ; Abdulla, Roopa ; Sable, Ravindranath ; Bhosale, Veera ; Halli, Rajshekhar</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Nandini ; Abdulla, Roopa ; Sable, Ravindranath ; Bhosale, Veera ; Halli, Rajshekhar</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To evaluate and compare the differences between the spontaneous smile captured by conventional photography and the video clip method. Methods: A digital video camera was used to capture smiles in 100 subjects using the static and videographic methods. Results: Measurements of the anterior and posterior height of the smile, interlabial gap, lower incisal display and eye wink on photographs obtained by the two methods showed considerable differences. Except for the anterior and posterior height of the smile in girls, these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.005). The majority of subjects showed parallel smile arcs back to the maxillary second premolar though differences existed between the two methods. Conclusions: In orthodontic treatment planning, certain treatment modalities (in particular intrusion and expansion) are based on an analysis of the full spontaneous smile. Since the videographic method is better able to capture this smile, it may be a preferred method of obtaining pretreatment facial photographs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-5742</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-9098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0974909820160103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Publications</publisher><subject>Digital photography ; Digital video ; Displays (Marketing) ; Internet videos ; Methods ; Photography</subject><ispartof>Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 2016-01, Vol.50 (1), p.8-13</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Nandini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulla, Roopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sable, Ravindranath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhosale, Veera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halli, Rajshekhar</creatorcontrib><title>Smile analysis: A comparison between photographic and videographic methods</title><title>Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society</title><description>Objectives: To evaluate and compare the differences between the spontaneous smile captured by conventional photography and the video clip method. Methods: A digital video camera was used to capture smiles in 100 subjects using the static and videographic methods. Results: Measurements of the anterior and posterior height of the smile, interlabial gap, lower incisal display and eye wink on photographs obtained by the two methods showed considerable differences. Except for the anterior and posterior height of the smile in girls, these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.005). The majority of subjects showed parallel smile arcs back to the maxillary second premolar though differences existed between the two methods. Conclusions: In orthodontic treatment planning, certain treatment modalities (in particular intrusion and expansion) are based on an analysis of the full spontaneous smile. Since the videographic method is better able to capture this smile, it may be a preferred method of obtaining pretreatment facial photographs.</description><subject>Digital photography</subject><subject>Digital video</subject><subject>Displays (Marketing)</subject><subject>Internet videos</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Photography</subject><issn>0301-5742</issn><issn>0974-9098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM9LwzAUx4soOObuHgueO1_StGm9jeH8wcCDeg5p-rrFtU1JqmX_vanTgSI5vPDl833wPkFwSWBOCOfXkHOWQ55RICkQiE-CyRhFY3bq_zGQKOGMngcz594AgFASA8smweNzo2sMZSvrvdPuJlyEyjSdtNqZNiywHxDbsNua3mys7LZaebYMP3SJx6DBfmtKdxGcVbJ2OPue0-B1dfuyvI_WT3cPy8U6UhRyF2FZxFlBaMqqgslYVQpplauccMXSolB5yhiTeYmU8iTNVJExyTjLPAVQlBBPg6vD3o2sUei2Mr2VqtFOiUWSEfBCOPXU_B_KvxIbrUyLlb_7dwEOBWWNcxYr0VndSLsXBMRoWfy17CurQ2UwdY_W7er3Aa1osNy1Zhh7zGPiqF8QnnBIRCa-rIsf6_Enx4CFog</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Singh, Nandini</creator><creator>Abdulla, Roopa</creator><creator>Sable, Ravindranath</creator><creator>Bhosale, Veera</creator><creator>Halli, Rajshekhar</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Publications</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Smile analysis: A comparison between photographic and videographic methods</title><author>Singh, Nandini ; Abdulla, Roopa ; Sable, Ravindranath ; Bhosale, Veera ; Halli, Rajshekhar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c209s-edb38b1264fb4a3cfce2f9c917c46bbc96444a9de227568cb84a4748e2f00bd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Digital photography</topic><topic>Digital video</topic><topic>Displays (Marketing)</topic><topic>Internet videos</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Photography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Nandini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulla, Roopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sable, Ravindranath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhosale, Veera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halli, Rajshekhar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Nandini</au><au>Abdulla, Roopa</au><au>Sable, Ravindranath</au><au>Bhosale, Veera</au><au>Halli, Rajshekhar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smile analysis: A comparison between photographic and videographic methods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>8-13</pages><issn>0301-5742</issn><eissn>0974-9098</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To evaluate and compare the differences between the spontaneous smile captured by conventional photography and the video clip method. Methods: A digital video camera was used to capture smiles in 100 subjects using the static and videographic methods. Results: Measurements of the anterior and posterior height of the smile, interlabial gap, lower incisal display and eye wink on photographs obtained by the two methods showed considerable differences. Except for the anterior and posterior height of the smile in girls, these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.005). The majority of subjects showed parallel smile arcs back to the maxillary second premolar though differences existed between the two methods. Conclusions: In orthodontic treatment planning, certain treatment modalities (in particular intrusion and expansion) are based on an analysis of the full spontaneous smile. Since the videographic method is better able to capture this smile, it may be a preferred method of obtaining pretreatment facial photographs.</abstract><pub>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0974909820160103</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-5742 |
ispartof | Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 2016-01, Vol.50 (1), p.8-13 |
issn | 0301-5742 0974-9098 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A581017772 |
source | SAGE Open Access |
subjects | Digital photography Digital video Displays (Marketing) Internet videos Methods Photography |
title | Smile analysis: A comparison between photographic and videographic methods |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A40%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smile%20analysis:%20A%20comparison%20between%20photographic%20and%20videographic%20methods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Indian%20Orthodontic%20Society&rft.au=Singh,%20Nandini&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=8-13&rft.issn=0301-5742&rft.eissn=0974-9098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0974909820160103&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA581017772%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c209s-edb38b1264fb4a3cfce2f9c917c46bbc96444a9de227568cb84a4748e2f00bd03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A581017772&rfr_iscdi=true |