Loading…

Comparing the effect of STan

Background Cardiotocography is almost ubiquitous in its use in intrapartum care. Although it has been demonstrated that there is some benefit from continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring using cardiotocography, there is also an increased risk of caesarean section which is accompanied by short-term a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trials 2019-08, Vol.20 (1)
Main Authors: Turnbull, D, Salter, A, Simpson, B, Mol, B. W, Chandraharan, E, McPhee, A, Symonds, I, Benton, M, Kuah, S, Matthews, G, Howard, K, Wilkinson, C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Trials
container_volume 20
creator Turnbull, D
Salter, A
Simpson, B
Mol, B. W
Chandraharan, E
McPhee, A
Symonds, I
Benton, M
Kuah, S
Matthews, G
Howard, K
Wilkinson, C
description Background Cardiotocography is almost ubiquitous in its use in intrapartum care. Although it has been demonstrated that there is some benefit from continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring using cardiotocography, there is also an increased risk of caesarean section which is accompanied by short-term and long-term risks to the mother and child. There is considerable potential to reduce unnecessary operative delivery with up to a 60% false positive diagnosis of fetal distress using cardiotocography alone. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram is a promising adjunct to cardiotocography alone, and permits detection of metabolic acidosis of the fetus, potentially reducing false positive diagnosis of fetal distress. Methods This study will be a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, conducted over 3 years. The primary hypothesis will be that the proportion of women with an emergency caesarean section on ST analysis will not equal that for women on cardiotocography monitoring alone. Participants will be recruited at the Women's and Children's Hospital, a high-risk specialty facility with approximately 5000 deliveries per annum. A total of 1818 women will be randomised to the treatment or conventional arm with an allocation ratio of 1:1, stratified by parity. The primary outcome is emergency caesarean section (yes/no). Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials and will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes will also be analysed. Additional study outcomes include psychosocial outcomes, patient preferences and cost-effectiveness. Discussion Approximately 20% of Australian babies are delivered by emergency caesarean section. This will be the first Australian trial to examine ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram as an adjunct to cardiotocography as a potential method for reducing this proportion. The trial will be among the first to comprehensively examine ST analysis, taking into account the impact on psychosocial well-being as well as cost-effectiveness. This research will provide Australian evidence for clinical practice and guideline development as well as for policy-makers and consumers to make informed, evidence-based choices about care in labour. Trial registration ANZCTR, ACTRN1261800006268. Registered on 19 January 2018. Keywords: Continuous electronic fetal monitoring, Cardiotocography, ST analysis, Caesarean section, Randomised controlled trial, START
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A600195949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A600195949</galeid><sourcerecordid>A600195949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g679-fe2e42ac8396cc62cc6127e85795a03c7c10234e1d22d106d3f82330c4ec63e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptT8FKw0AUXETBWv0AwUPA89b39m022WMJWoWCB3Mvy8vbGGkS6eb_cUEPPchjmGGYGXhK3SNsEGv3lJDAkQb0mpwF7S_UCitbamewvDzT1-ompS8AS57sSj008_gdTsPUF8unFBKj8FLMsfhow3SrrmI4Jrn747VqX57b5lXv33dvzXave1d5HcWINYFr8o7ZmQw0ldRl5csAxBUjGLKCnTEdguso1oYI2Ao7EqS1evyd7cNRDsMU5-UUeBwSH7YO8kultz6nNv-k8nUyDjxPEofsnxV-AO3TTAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the effect of STan</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Turnbull, D ; Salter, A ; Simpson, B ; Mol, B. W ; Chandraharan, E ; McPhee, A ; Symonds, I ; Benton, M ; Kuah, S ; Matthews, G ; Howard, K ; Wilkinson, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, D ; Salter, A ; Simpson, B ; Mol, B. W ; Chandraharan, E ; McPhee, A ; Symonds, I ; Benton, M ; Kuah, S ; Matthews, G ; Howard, K ; Wilkinson, C</creatorcontrib><description>Background Cardiotocography is almost ubiquitous in its use in intrapartum care. Although it has been demonstrated that there is some benefit from continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring using cardiotocography, there is also an increased risk of caesarean section which is accompanied by short-term and long-term risks to the mother and child. There is considerable potential to reduce unnecessary operative delivery with up to a 60% false positive diagnosis of fetal distress using cardiotocography alone. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram is a promising adjunct to cardiotocography alone, and permits detection of metabolic acidosis of the fetus, potentially reducing false positive diagnosis of fetal distress. Methods This study will be a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, conducted over 3 years. The primary hypothesis will be that the proportion of women with an emergency caesarean section on ST analysis will not equal that for women on cardiotocography monitoring alone. Participants will be recruited at the Women's and Children's Hospital, a high-risk specialty facility with approximately 5000 deliveries per annum. A total of 1818 women will be randomised to the treatment or conventional arm with an allocation ratio of 1:1, stratified by parity. The primary outcome is emergency caesarean section (yes/no). Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials and will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes will also be analysed. Additional study outcomes include psychosocial outcomes, patient preferences and cost-effectiveness. Discussion Approximately 20% of Australian babies are delivered by emergency caesarean section. This will be the first Australian trial to examine ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram as an adjunct to cardiotocography as a potential method for reducing this proportion. The trial will be among the first to comprehensively examine ST analysis, taking into account the impact on psychosocial well-being as well as cost-effectiveness. This research will provide Australian evidence for clinical practice and guideline development as well as for policy-makers and consumers to make informed, evidence-based choices about care in labour. Trial registration ANZCTR, ACTRN1261800006268. Registered on 19 January 2018. Keywords: Continuous electronic fetal monitoring, Cardiotocography, ST analysis, Caesarean section, Randomised controlled trial, START</description><identifier>ISSN: 1745-6215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Acidosis ; Cesarean section ; Electrocardiography ; Evidence-based medicine ; Infants ; Medical research ; Methods ; Newborn infants ; Patient monitoring equipment</subject><ispartof>Trials, 2019-08, Vol.20 (1)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salter, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, B. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandraharan, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPhee, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Symonds, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benton, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuah, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, C</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the effect of STan</title><title>Trials</title><description>Background Cardiotocography is almost ubiquitous in its use in intrapartum care. Although it has been demonstrated that there is some benefit from continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring using cardiotocography, there is also an increased risk of caesarean section which is accompanied by short-term and long-term risks to the mother and child. There is considerable potential to reduce unnecessary operative delivery with up to a 60% false positive diagnosis of fetal distress using cardiotocography alone. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram is a promising adjunct to cardiotocography alone, and permits detection of metabolic acidosis of the fetus, potentially reducing false positive diagnosis of fetal distress. Methods This study will be a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, conducted over 3 years. The primary hypothesis will be that the proportion of women with an emergency caesarean section on ST analysis will not equal that for women on cardiotocography monitoring alone. Participants will be recruited at the Women's and Children's Hospital, a high-risk specialty facility with approximately 5000 deliveries per annum. A total of 1818 women will be randomised to the treatment or conventional arm with an allocation ratio of 1:1, stratified by parity. The primary outcome is emergency caesarean section (yes/no). Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials and will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes will also be analysed. Additional study outcomes include psychosocial outcomes, patient preferences and cost-effectiveness. Discussion Approximately 20% of Australian babies are delivered by emergency caesarean section. This will be the first Australian trial to examine ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram as an adjunct to cardiotocography as a potential method for reducing this proportion. The trial will be among the first to comprehensively examine ST analysis, taking into account the impact on psychosocial well-being as well as cost-effectiveness. This research will provide Australian evidence for clinical practice and guideline development as well as for policy-makers and consumers to make informed, evidence-based choices about care in labour. Trial registration ANZCTR, ACTRN1261800006268. Registered on 19 January 2018. Keywords: Continuous electronic fetal monitoring, Cardiotocography, ST analysis, Caesarean section, Randomised controlled trial, START</description><subject>Acidosis</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Newborn infants</subject><subject>Patient monitoring equipment</subject><issn>1745-6215</issn><issn>1745-6215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptT8FKw0AUXETBWv0AwUPA89b39m022WMJWoWCB3Mvy8vbGGkS6eb_cUEPPchjmGGYGXhK3SNsEGv3lJDAkQb0mpwF7S_UCitbamewvDzT1-ompS8AS57sSj008_gdTsPUF8unFBKj8FLMsfhow3SrrmI4Jrn747VqX57b5lXv33dvzXave1d5HcWINYFr8o7ZmQw0ldRl5csAxBUjGLKCnTEdguso1oYI2Ao7EqS1evyd7cNRDsMU5-UUeBwSH7YO8kultz6nNv-k8nUyDjxPEofsnxV-AO3TTAw</recordid><startdate>20190829</startdate><enddate>20190829</enddate><creator>Turnbull, D</creator><creator>Salter, A</creator><creator>Simpson, B</creator><creator>Mol, B. W</creator><creator>Chandraharan, E</creator><creator>McPhee, A</creator><creator>Symonds, I</creator><creator>Benton, M</creator><creator>Kuah, S</creator><creator>Matthews, G</creator><creator>Howard, K</creator><creator>Wilkinson, C</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20190829</creationdate><title>Comparing the effect of STan</title><author>Turnbull, D ; Salter, A ; Simpson, B ; Mol, B. W ; Chandraharan, E ; McPhee, A ; Symonds, I ; Benton, M ; Kuah, S ; Matthews, G ; Howard, K ; Wilkinson, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g679-fe2e42ac8396cc62cc6127e85795a03c7c10234e1d22d106d3f82330c4ec63e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acidosis</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Newborn infants</topic><topic>Patient monitoring equipment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salter, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, B. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandraharan, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPhee, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Symonds, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benton, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuah, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, C</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Trials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turnbull, D</au><au>Salter, A</au><au>Simpson, B</au><au>Mol, B. W</au><au>Chandraharan, E</au><au>McPhee, A</au><au>Symonds, I</au><au>Benton, M</au><au>Kuah, S</au><au>Matthews, G</au><au>Howard, K</au><au>Wilkinson, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the effect of STan</atitle><jtitle>Trials</jtitle><date>2019-08-29</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1745-6215</issn><eissn>1745-6215</eissn><abstract>Background Cardiotocography is almost ubiquitous in its use in intrapartum care. Although it has been demonstrated that there is some benefit from continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring using cardiotocography, there is also an increased risk of caesarean section which is accompanied by short-term and long-term risks to the mother and child. There is considerable potential to reduce unnecessary operative delivery with up to a 60% false positive diagnosis of fetal distress using cardiotocography alone. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram is a promising adjunct to cardiotocography alone, and permits detection of metabolic acidosis of the fetus, potentially reducing false positive diagnosis of fetal distress. Methods This study will be a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, conducted over 3 years. The primary hypothesis will be that the proportion of women with an emergency caesarean section on ST analysis will not equal that for women on cardiotocography monitoring alone. Participants will be recruited at the Women's and Children's Hospital, a high-risk specialty facility with approximately 5000 deliveries per annum. A total of 1818 women will be randomised to the treatment or conventional arm with an allocation ratio of 1:1, stratified by parity. The primary outcome is emergency caesarean section (yes/no). Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials and will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes will also be analysed. Additional study outcomes include psychosocial outcomes, patient preferences and cost-effectiveness. Discussion Approximately 20% of Australian babies are delivered by emergency caesarean section. This will be the first Australian trial to examine ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram as an adjunct to cardiotocography as a potential method for reducing this proportion. The trial will be among the first to comprehensively examine ST analysis, taking into account the impact on psychosocial well-being as well as cost-effectiveness. This research will provide Australian evidence for clinical practice and guideline development as well as for policy-makers and consumers to make informed, evidence-based choices about care in labour. Trial registration ANZCTR, ACTRN1261800006268. Registered on 19 January 2018. Keywords: Continuous electronic fetal monitoring, Cardiotocography, ST analysis, Caesarean section, Randomised controlled trial, START</abstract><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><doi>10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1745-6215
ispartof Trials, 2019-08, Vol.20 (1)
issn 1745-6215
1745-6215
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A600195949
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central(OpenAccess)
subjects Acidosis
Cesarean section
Electrocardiography
Evidence-based medicine
Infants
Medical research
Methods
Newborn infants
Patient monitoring equipment
title Comparing the effect of STan
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A56%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20effect%20of%20STan&rft.jtitle=Trials&rft.au=Turnbull,%20D&rft.date=2019-08-29&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1745-6215&rft.eissn=1745-6215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA600195949%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g679-fe2e42ac8396cc62cc6127e85795a03c7c10234e1d22d106d3f82330c4ec63e13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A600195949&rfr_iscdi=true