Loading…

Outcomes of anterior resection after laparoscopic and open surgery

Background The introduction of the laparoscope has improved the feasibility and patient health, owing to being a less invasive procedure. The use of a laparoscope for colorectal cancer surgery was debatable for fear of recurrence, tumor spillage, and nonradical tumor excision. However, the tendency...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Egyptian journal of surgery : official organ of the Egyptian Society of Surgeons = Majallat al-jirāhah al-Misrīyah 2020-04, Vol.39 (2), p.371-378
Main Authors: ElMaghrabi, Sherif, Shafik, Youhanna, Abdelaziz, Heba
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 378
container_issue 2
container_start_page 371
container_title The Egyptian journal of surgery : official organ of the Egyptian Society of Surgeons = Majallat al-jirāhah al-Misrīyah
container_volume 39
creator ElMaghrabi, Sherif
Shafik, Youhanna
Abdelaziz, Heba
description Background The introduction of the laparoscope has improved the feasibility and patient health, owing to being a less invasive procedure. The use of a laparoscope for colorectal cancer surgery was debatable for fear of recurrence, tumor spillage, and nonradical tumor excision. However, the tendency for using laparoscopy in colorectal cancer surgery is in favor nowadays. Aim The aim was to compare the results of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques in colorectal cancer located in the rectosigmoid region. Patients and methods This prospective study included 50 patients with upper rectal cancer attending the outpatient clinic of Ain Shams University Hospitals, who were treated over a 3-year period. Patients underwent anterior resection either by open technique (first group) or using laparoscopy (second group). Comparative items included operative events (time, blood loss, efficacy of tumor resection, etc.), early postoperative complications (wound infection, anastomotic leakage, etc.), and late postoperative complications (stricture and local recurrence). Results This study shows no significant difference between the two groups regarding length of specimen, safety margins, number of retrieved lymph nodes, tumor recurrence, or mortality. However, it shows significantly longer procedure, less blood loss, and less wound complications in the laparoscopic group. Conclusion Both laparoscopic and open procedures for rectal cancer surgeries can achieve the same radical resection; however, wound complications seemingly are more frequent in cases having open colorectal resections. The time consumption problem of advanced laparoscopic surgery will improve by gaining more experience and using the best equipment.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/ejs.ejs_218_19
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A623157971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A623157971</galeid><sourcerecordid>A623157971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279s-d2ad6d3daa90f08b8b38665b5790c07ac085c0519d87512b04ebf4ed6dd3bdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1LwzAUxYsoOHSvPhcE3zpzm7Zp35zDLxjsZe8hTW62bG1Tko6x_96MKSpMQki4nN8hOSeK7oBMMiD0ETd-EjZPoeRQXUQjKEqWsCLNLsMdgCQAKVxHY-83hBBIy6Io6Ch6XuwGaVv0sdWx6AZ0xrrYoUc5GNvFQodR3IheOOul7Y0MKhXbHrvY79wK3eE2utKi8Tj-Om-i5evLcvaezBdvH7PpPJEpq3yiUqEKRZUQFdGkrMuahjfkdc4qIgkTkpS5JDlUqmQ5pDXJsNYZBkbRWtX0Jro_2a5Eg9x02g5OyNZ4yadFSiH4MAiqyRlVWApbI22H2oT5H-DhF7BG0Qxrb5vd8ff-rLMMSXiHmvfOtMIdOBB-7IAf8__pIABPJ2BvmxCi3za7PTreotp2dv8PxSkD_t0J_QQz25E1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of anterior resection after laparoscopic and open surgery</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><creator>ElMaghrabi, Sherif ; Shafik, Youhanna ; Abdelaziz, Heba</creator><creatorcontrib>ElMaghrabi, Sherif ; Shafik, Youhanna ; Abdelaziz, Heba</creatorcontrib><description>Background The introduction of the laparoscope has improved the feasibility and patient health, owing to being a less invasive procedure. The use of a laparoscope for colorectal cancer surgery was debatable for fear of recurrence, tumor spillage, and nonradical tumor excision. However, the tendency for using laparoscopy in colorectal cancer surgery is in favor nowadays. Aim The aim was to compare the results of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques in colorectal cancer located in the rectosigmoid region. Patients and methods This prospective study included 50 patients with upper rectal cancer attending the outpatient clinic of Ain Shams University Hospitals, who were treated over a 3-year period. Patients underwent anterior resection either by open technique (first group) or using laparoscopy (second group). Comparative items included operative events (time, blood loss, efficacy of tumor resection, etc.), early postoperative complications (wound infection, anastomotic leakage, etc.), and late postoperative complications (stricture and local recurrence). Results This study shows no significant difference between the two groups regarding length of specimen, safety margins, number of retrieved lymph nodes, tumor recurrence, or mortality. However, it shows significantly longer procedure, less blood loss, and less wound complications in the laparoscopic group. Conclusion Both laparoscopic and open procedures for rectal cancer surgeries can achieve the same radical resection; however, wound complications seemingly are more frequent in cases having open colorectal resections. The time consumption problem of advanced laparoscopic surgery will improve by gaining more experience and using the best equipment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1110-1121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-7624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_218_19</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Colorectal cancer ; Health ; Laparoscopy ; Medical research ; Metronidazole ; Recurrence (Disease) ; Tumor removal ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The Egyptian journal of surgery : official organ of the Egyptian Society of Surgeons = Majallat al-jirāhah al-Misrīyah, 2020-04, Vol.39 (2), p.371-378</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27435,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>ElMaghrabi, Sherif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shafik, Youhanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelaziz, Heba</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of anterior resection after laparoscopic and open surgery</title><title>The Egyptian journal of surgery : official organ of the Egyptian Society of Surgeons = Majallat al-jirāhah al-Misrīyah</title><description>Background The introduction of the laparoscope has improved the feasibility and patient health, owing to being a less invasive procedure. The use of a laparoscope for colorectal cancer surgery was debatable for fear of recurrence, tumor spillage, and nonradical tumor excision. However, the tendency for using laparoscopy in colorectal cancer surgery is in favor nowadays. Aim The aim was to compare the results of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques in colorectal cancer located in the rectosigmoid region. Patients and methods This prospective study included 50 patients with upper rectal cancer attending the outpatient clinic of Ain Shams University Hospitals, who were treated over a 3-year period. Patients underwent anterior resection either by open technique (first group) or using laparoscopy (second group). Comparative items included operative events (time, blood loss, efficacy of tumor resection, etc.), early postoperative complications (wound infection, anastomotic leakage, etc.), and late postoperative complications (stricture and local recurrence). Results This study shows no significant difference between the two groups regarding length of specimen, safety margins, number of retrieved lymph nodes, tumor recurrence, or mortality. However, it shows significantly longer procedure, less blood loss, and less wound complications in the laparoscopic group. Conclusion Both laparoscopic and open procedures for rectal cancer surgeries can achieve the same radical resection; however, wound complications seemingly are more frequent in cases having open colorectal resections. The time consumption problem of advanced laparoscopic surgery will improve by gaining more experience and using the best equipment.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Metronidazole</subject><subject>Recurrence (Disease)</subject><subject>Tumor removal</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1110-1121</issn><issn>1687-7624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd1LwzAUxYsoOHSvPhcE3zpzm7Zp35zDLxjsZe8hTW62bG1Tko6x_96MKSpMQki4nN8hOSeK7oBMMiD0ETd-EjZPoeRQXUQjKEqWsCLNLsMdgCQAKVxHY-83hBBIy6Io6Ch6XuwGaVv0sdWx6AZ0xrrYoUc5GNvFQodR3IheOOul7Y0MKhXbHrvY79wK3eE2utKi8Tj-Om-i5evLcvaezBdvH7PpPJEpq3yiUqEKRZUQFdGkrMuahjfkdc4qIgkTkpS5JDlUqmQ5pDXJsNYZBkbRWtX0Jro_2a5Eg9x02g5OyNZ4yadFSiH4MAiqyRlVWApbI22H2oT5H-DhF7BG0Qxrb5vd8ff-rLMMSXiHmvfOtMIdOBB-7IAf8__pIABPJ2BvmxCi3za7PTreotp2dv8PxSkD_t0J_QQz25E1</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>ElMaghrabi, Sherif</creator><creator>Shafik, Youhanna</creator><creator>Abdelaziz, Heba</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Outcomes of anterior resection after laparoscopic and open surgery</title><author>ElMaghrabi, Sherif ; Shafik, Youhanna ; Abdelaziz, Heba</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279s-d2ad6d3daa90f08b8b38665b5790c07ac085c0519d87512b04ebf4ed6dd3bdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Metronidazole</topic><topic>Recurrence (Disease)</topic><topic>Tumor removal</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ElMaghrabi, Sherif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shafik, Youhanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelaziz, Heba</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Egyptian journal of surgery : official organ of the Egyptian Society of Surgeons = Majallat al-jirāhah al-Misrīyah</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ElMaghrabi, Sherif</au><au>Shafik, Youhanna</au><au>Abdelaziz, Heba</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of anterior resection after laparoscopic and open surgery</atitle><jtitle>The Egyptian journal of surgery : official organ of the Egyptian Society of Surgeons = Majallat al-jirāhah al-Misrīyah</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>371-378</pages><issn>1110-1121</issn><eissn>1687-7624</eissn><abstract>Background The introduction of the laparoscope has improved the feasibility and patient health, owing to being a less invasive procedure. The use of a laparoscope for colorectal cancer surgery was debatable for fear of recurrence, tumor spillage, and nonradical tumor excision. However, the tendency for using laparoscopy in colorectal cancer surgery is in favor nowadays. Aim The aim was to compare the results of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques in colorectal cancer located in the rectosigmoid region. Patients and methods This prospective study included 50 patients with upper rectal cancer attending the outpatient clinic of Ain Shams University Hospitals, who were treated over a 3-year period. Patients underwent anterior resection either by open technique (first group) or using laparoscopy (second group). Comparative items included operative events (time, blood loss, efficacy of tumor resection, etc.), early postoperative complications (wound infection, anastomotic leakage, etc.), and late postoperative complications (stricture and local recurrence). Results This study shows no significant difference between the two groups regarding length of specimen, safety margins, number of retrieved lymph nodes, tumor recurrence, or mortality. However, it shows significantly longer procedure, less blood loss, and less wound complications in the laparoscopic group. Conclusion Both laparoscopic and open procedures for rectal cancer surgeries can achieve the same radical resection; however, wound complications seemingly are more frequent in cases having open colorectal resections. The time consumption problem of advanced laparoscopic surgery will improve by gaining more experience and using the best equipment.</abstract><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/ejs.ejs_218_19</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1110-1121
ispartof The Egyptian journal of surgery : official organ of the Egyptian Society of Surgeons = Majallat al-jirāhah al-Misrīyah, 2020-04, Vol.39 (2), p.371-378
issn 1110-1121
1687-7624
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A623157971
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals
subjects Cancer
Cancer patients
Colorectal cancer
Health
Laparoscopy
Medical research
Metronidazole
Recurrence (Disease)
Tumor removal
Tumors
title Outcomes of anterior resection after laparoscopic and open surgery
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T09%3A27%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20anterior%20resection%20after%20laparoscopic%20and%20open%20surgery&rft.jtitle=The%20Egyptian%20journal%20of%20surgery%20:%20official%20organ%20of%20the%20Egyptian%20Society%20of%20Surgeons%20=%20Majallat%20al-jir%C4%81hah%20al-Misr%C4%AByah&rft.au=ElMaghrabi,%20Sherif&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=371-378&rft.issn=1110-1121&rft.eissn=1687-7624&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ejs.ejs_218_19&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA623157971%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279s-d2ad6d3daa90f08b8b38665b5790c07ac085c0519d87512b04ebf4ed6dd3bdb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A623157971&rfr_iscdi=true