Loading…

Efects of pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea and functional capacity on waiting list for lung transplantation: According to obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to be effective on exercise capacity and dyspnea in lung transplantation (LTx) candidates. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of PR and to compare the outcomes in LTx candidates with obstructive and restrictive lung diseases....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Eurasian journal of pulmonology 2020-05, Vol.22 (2), p.79
Main Authors: Kilic, Lutfye, Pehlivan, Esra, Balci, Arif, Bakan, Nur Dilek
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 79
container_title Eurasian journal of pulmonology
container_volume 22
creator Kilic, Lutfye
Pehlivan, Esra
Balci, Arif
Bakan, Nur Dilek
description BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to be effective on exercise capacity and dyspnea in lung transplantation (LTx) candidates. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of PR and to compare the outcomes in LTx candidates with obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. METHODS: Between January 2013 and May 2018, medical data of 86 patients who were on the waiting list for LTx were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on the diagnosis as obstructive patients (Group 1) and restrictive patients (Group 2). Six-minute walking test (6MWT), the Borg scale, and the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scores were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients completed the 8-week PR protocol (n = 42 in Group 1 and n = 23 in Group 2). Irrespective of the initial diagnosis, there was a significant (P < 0.05) improvement in the 6MWT distance in both groups without any statistically significant difference between the groups (Group 1, 299 m [42-548] vs. 377 m [84-561], mean increase 78 m, P < 0.001; Group 2, 337 m [70-525] vs. 396 m [139-621], mean increase 59 m, P = 0.002; [DELTA], P = 0.476). The effect of PR on dyspnea was significantly improved in both groups, whereas there were no differences between groups. CONCLUSION: PR has a positive effect on exercise capacity and dyspnea in patients with both obstructive and restrictive lung diseases who are on the waiting list for LTx. Our study results suggest that PR is effective in LTx candidates, irrespective of the initial diagnosis. Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, exercise training, interstitial lung disease, lung transplantation, pulmonary rehabilitation
doi_str_mv 10.4103/ejop.ejop_38_19
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A636127164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A636127164</galeid><sourcerecordid>A636127164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g674-cc1794e87e33e07ffe6998689b679b393eff56e28745e8b8411b9a96d0559493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptT01LAzEQzUHBUnv2GvC8NdlksxtvpdQPKHjQ-5LNTmpKmiybrNKf5L80pYIenBlmeMN7jxmEbihZckrYHezDsDy1ljUtlRdoVlLeFEyU5AotYtwTQmhFc5Qz9LUxoFPEweBhcofg1XjEI7yrzjqbVLLB41z9MQ4eFFa-x2by-rRXDms1KG3T8UT5VDZZv8POxoRNGLGbMkqj8nFwyp-97vFK6zD2J2IKOHQxjVN2-wCcFSNkaM_w95reRlARrtGlUS7C4mfO0evD5m39VGxfHp_Xq22xEzUvtKa15NDUwBiQ2hgQUjaikZ2oZcckA2MqAWVT8wqaruGUdlJJ0ZOqklyyObo9u-6Ug9Z6E_IH-mCjbleCCVrWVPDMWv7DytnDwergwdi8_yP4BgHtguI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efects of pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea and functional capacity on waiting list for lung transplantation: According to obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kilic, Lutfye ; Pehlivan, Esra ; Balci, Arif ; Bakan, Nur Dilek</creator><creatorcontrib>Kilic, Lutfye ; Pehlivan, Esra ; Balci, Arif ; Bakan, Nur Dilek</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to be effective on exercise capacity and dyspnea in lung transplantation (LTx) candidates. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of PR and to compare the outcomes in LTx candidates with obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. METHODS: Between January 2013 and May 2018, medical data of 86 patients who were on the waiting list for LTx were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on the diagnosis as obstructive patients (Group 1) and restrictive patients (Group 2). Six-minute walking test (6MWT), the Borg scale, and the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scores were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients completed the 8-week PR protocol (n = 42 in Group 1 and n = 23 in Group 2). Irrespective of the initial diagnosis, there was a significant (P &lt; 0.05) improvement in the 6MWT distance in both groups without any statistically significant difference between the groups (Group 1, 299 m [42-548] vs. 377 m [84-561], mean increase 78 m, P &lt; 0.001; Group 2, 337 m [70-525] vs. 396 m [139-621], mean increase 59 m, P = 0.002; [DELTA], P = 0.476). The effect of PR on dyspnea was significantly improved in both groups, whereas there were no differences between groups. CONCLUSION: PR has a positive effect on exercise capacity and dyspnea in patients with both obstructive and restrictive lung diseases who are on the waiting list for LTx. Our study results suggest that PR is effective in LTx candidates, irrespective of the initial diagnosis. Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, exercise training, interstitial lung disease, lung transplantation, pulmonary rehabilitation</description><identifier>ISSN: 2148-3620</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ejop.ejop_38_19</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AVES</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Chronic obstructive lung disease ; Health care information services ; Medical research ; Organ transplantation</subject><ispartof>Eurasian journal of pulmonology, 2020-05, Vol.22 (2), p.79</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 AVES</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kilic, Lutfye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pehlivan, Esra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balci, Arif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakan, Nur Dilek</creatorcontrib><title>Efects of pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea and functional capacity on waiting list for lung transplantation: According to obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease</title><title>Eurasian journal of pulmonology</title><description>BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to be effective on exercise capacity and dyspnea in lung transplantation (LTx) candidates. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of PR and to compare the outcomes in LTx candidates with obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. METHODS: Between January 2013 and May 2018, medical data of 86 patients who were on the waiting list for LTx were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on the diagnosis as obstructive patients (Group 1) and restrictive patients (Group 2). Six-minute walking test (6MWT), the Borg scale, and the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scores were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients completed the 8-week PR protocol (n = 42 in Group 1 and n = 23 in Group 2). Irrespective of the initial diagnosis, there was a significant (P &lt; 0.05) improvement in the 6MWT distance in both groups without any statistically significant difference between the groups (Group 1, 299 m [42-548] vs. 377 m [84-561], mean increase 78 m, P &lt; 0.001; Group 2, 337 m [70-525] vs. 396 m [139-621], mean increase 59 m, P = 0.002; [DELTA], P = 0.476). The effect of PR on dyspnea was significantly improved in both groups, whereas there were no differences between groups. CONCLUSION: PR has a positive effect on exercise capacity and dyspnea in patients with both obstructive and restrictive lung diseases who are on the waiting list for LTx. Our study results suggest that PR is effective in LTx candidates, irrespective of the initial diagnosis. Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, exercise training, interstitial lung disease, lung transplantation, pulmonary rehabilitation</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive lung disease</subject><subject>Health care information services</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Organ transplantation</subject><issn>2148-3620</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptT01LAzEQzUHBUnv2GvC8NdlksxtvpdQPKHjQ-5LNTmpKmiybrNKf5L80pYIenBlmeMN7jxmEbihZckrYHezDsDy1ljUtlRdoVlLeFEyU5AotYtwTQmhFc5Qz9LUxoFPEweBhcofg1XjEI7yrzjqbVLLB41z9MQ4eFFa-x2by-rRXDms1KG3T8UT5VDZZv8POxoRNGLGbMkqj8nFwyp-97vFK6zD2J2IKOHQxjVN2-wCcFSNkaM_w95reRlARrtGlUS7C4mfO0evD5m39VGxfHp_Xq22xEzUvtKa15NDUwBiQ2hgQUjaikZ2oZcckA2MqAWVT8wqaruGUdlJJ0ZOqklyyObo9u-6Ug9Z6E_IH-mCjbleCCVrWVPDMWv7DytnDwergwdi8_yP4BgHtguI</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Kilic, Lutfye</creator><creator>Pehlivan, Esra</creator><creator>Balci, Arif</creator><creator>Bakan, Nur Dilek</creator><general>AVES</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Efects of pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea and functional capacity on waiting list for lung transplantation: According to obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease</title><author>Kilic, Lutfye ; Pehlivan, Esra ; Balci, Arif ; Bakan, Nur Dilek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g674-cc1794e87e33e07ffe6998689b679b393eff56e28745e8b8411b9a96d0559493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive lung disease</topic><topic>Health care information services</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Organ transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kilic, Lutfye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pehlivan, Esra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balci, Arif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakan, Nur Dilek</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Eurasian journal of pulmonology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kilic, Lutfye</au><au>Pehlivan, Esra</au><au>Balci, Arif</au><au>Bakan, Nur Dilek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efects of pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea and functional capacity on waiting list for lung transplantation: According to obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease</atitle><jtitle>Eurasian journal of pulmonology</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>79</spage><pages>79-</pages><issn>2148-3620</issn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to be effective on exercise capacity and dyspnea in lung transplantation (LTx) candidates. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of PR and to compare the outcomes in LTx candidates with obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. METHODS: Between January 2013 and May 2018, medical data of 86 patients who were on the waiting list for LTx were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on the diagnosis as obstructive patients (Group 1) and restrictive patients (Group 2). Six-minute walking test (6MWT), the Borg scale, and the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scores were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients completed the 8-week PR protocol (n = 42 in Group 1 and n = 23 in Group 2). Irrespective of the initial diagnosis, there was a significant (P &lt; 0.05) improvement in the 6MWT distance in both groups without any statistically significant difference between the groups (Group 1, 299 m [42-548] vs. 377 m [84-561], mean increase 78 m, P &lt; 0.001; Group 2, 337 m [70-525] vs. 396 m [139-621], mean increase 59 m, P = 0.002; [DELTA], P = 0.476). The effect of PR on dyspnea was significantly improved in both groups, whereas there were no differences between groups. CONCLUSION: PR has a positive effect on exercise capacity and dyspnea in patients with both obstructive and restrictive lung diseases who are on the waiting list for LTx. Our study results suggest that PR is effective in LTx candidates, irrespective of the initial diagnosis. Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, exercise training, interstitial lung disease, lung transplantation, pulmonary rehabilitation</abstract><pub>AVES</pub><doi>10.4103/ejop.ejop_38_19</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2148-3620
ispartof Eurasian journal of pulmonology, 2020-05, Vol.22 (2), p.79
issn 2148-3620
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A636127164
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis
Chronic obstructive lung disease
Health care information services
Medical research
Organ transplantation
title Efects of pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea and functional capacity on waiting list for lung transplantation: According to obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A03%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efects%20of%20pulmonary%20rehabilitation%20on%20dyspnea%20and%20functional%20capacity%20on%20waiting%20list%20for%20lung%20transplantation:%20According%20to%20obstructive%20or%20restrictive%20pulmonary%20disease&rft.jtitle=Eurasian%20journal%20of%20pulmonology&rft.au=Kilic,%20Lutfye&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=79&rft.pages=79-&rft.issn=2148-3620&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ejop.ejop_38_19&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA636127164%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g674-cc1794e87e33e07ffe6998689b679b393eff56e28745e8b8411b9a96d0559493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A636127164&rfr_iscdi=true