Discontinuation of Glycopeptides in Patients with Culture Negative Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Propensity-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

• Published in: Antibiotics 2020, Vol.9 (5)
• Main Authors: Kim, Yong Chan, Kim, Jung Ho, Ahn, Jin Young, Jeong, Su Jin, Ku, Nam Su, Choi, Jun Yong, Yeom, Joon-Sup, Park, Yoon Soo, Song, Young Goo, Kim, Ha Yan
• Format: Report
• Language: English
• Subjects: Health aspects; Peptides; Physiological aspects; Sepsis
• ISSN: 2079-6382; 2079-6382
• DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9050250

Implementation of antibiotic stewardship is difficult in patients with sepsis because of severity of disease. We evaluated the impact of glycopeptide discontinuation (GD) in patients with culture negative severe sepsis or septic shock who received glycopeptides as initial empiric antibiotic therapy at admission. We conducted a single center retrospective cohort study between January 2010 and March 2018. GD was defined as discontinuation of initial empiric glycopeptides on availability of culture results, revealing the absence of identified pathogens. In 92 included patients, the leading causes of sepsis were pneumonia (34.8%) and intra-abdominal infection (23.9%); 28-day mortality and overall mortality were 14% and 21%, respectively. Glycopeptides were discontinued in 42/92 patients. After propensity score matching, baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the GD and non-GD (GND) groups. GND was associated with development of acute kidney injury (OR 5.54, 95% CI 1.49-20.6, P = 0.011). GD did not increase the 7-day, 14-day, and 28-day mortality compared with GND. The length of hospital stay was shorter in the GD group than in GND group (16.33 [+ or -] 17.11 vs. 25.05 [+ or -] 14.37, P = 0.082), though not statistically significant. GD may be safe and reduce adverse events of prolonged antibiotic use in patients with culture negative severe sepsis or septic shock receiving glycopeptides as initial empiric antibiotic therapy.