WhatsApp-propriate? A retrospective content analysis of WhatsApp use and potential breaches in confidentiality among a team of doctors at a district hospital, South Africa

Background. There has been a steady increase in the use of electronic media and instant messaging among healthcare professionals, where it has been almost universally adopted in the workplace. The use of WhatsApp and its perceived benefits in healthcare have been extensively studied; however, there...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:South African medical journal 2021-02, Vol.111 (2), p.171
Main Authors: Meyer, G.D, Meyer, N, du Toit, J.D, Mans, P.A, Moffett, B.D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Confidential communications
Ethical aspects
Instant messaging software
Laws, regulations and rules
Physician and patient
Physicians
Technology application
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-96927bf3e985d14bac3cc2ac50a626e306d431273566271a04a39e19f3239f9e3
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 171
container_title South African medical journal
container_volume 111
creator Meyer, G.D
Meyer, N
du Toit, J.D
Mans, P.A
Moffett, B.D
description Background. There has been a steady increase in the use of electronic media and instant messaging among healthcare professionals, where it has been almost universally adopted in the workplace. The use of WhatsApp and its perceived benefits in healthcare have been extensively studied; however, there are concerns regarding the potential for ethical breaches in confidentiality through shared electronic patient information. Objectives. To identify the usage characteristics and incidence of shared patient information with WhatsApp use in a team of medical doctors in an unobserved and unregulated setting. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional content analysis of WhatsApp messages (n=3 340) among a team of 20 doctors in a South African district hospital over 6 months. All messages found within this time period were allocated unique identifiers. The text and image messages were thematically grouped into four categories, i.e. clinical care, resource allocation, social and administrative. Messages that contained patient-identifying information were included in the analysis. Results. Of a total of 3 340 messages sent, 220 (6.6%) contained patient-identifying information. Of these, 109 (3.3%) contained nonanonymised patient information, while in 111 (3.3%) messages, the information was anonymised. The likelihood of sharing patient identifiers was proportionally much higher in shared images (odds ratio (OR) 5.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-8.2; p
doi_str_mv 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i2.14453
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A655479494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A655479494</galeid><sourcerecordid>A655479494</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-96927bf3e985d14bac3cc2ac50a626e306d431273566271a04a39e19f3239f9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkV2L1TAQhosoeFz9CxIQvLI13z25krL4scuKF6t4Weakk22kbUqSs3B-k3_S1KPggsxFmJn3fYfwVNVLRpuWGf32tvt83XDKWXPPGPO8YVIq8ajacdrua8WEelztKFe6NqqVT6tnKf2gpVdG76qf30fIqVvXeo1hjR4yviMdiZhjSCva7O-R2LBkXDKBBaZT8okER_76yDFhWQxkDZvGw0QOEcGOmIhfNqvzw3nh84nAHJY7AiQjzFvMEGwOMREo6WTwKUdvMxnLbZ9hekNuwzGPpHNlDM-rJw6mhC_-vBfVtw_vv15-qm--fLy67G5qK-U-10Yb3h6cQLNXA5MHsMJaDlZR0FyjoHqQgvFWKK15y4BKEAaZcYIL4wyKi-rVOfcOJuz94kKOYGefbN9ppWRrpJFF1fxHVWrA2Zdvo_Nl_sDw-h_DiDDlMYXpmH1Y0kOhPgttYZAiur6AmSGeekb7DXm_Ie835P0Zef8bufgFkwahog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>WhatsApp-propriate? A retrospective content analysis of WhatsApp use and potential breaches in confidentiality among a team of doctors at a district hospital, South Africa</title><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Meyer, G.D ; Meyer, N ; du Toit, J.D ; Mans, P.A ; Moffett, B.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Meyer, G.D ; Meyer, N ; du Toit, J.D ; Mans, P.A ; Moffett, B.D</creatorcontrib><description>Background. There has been a steady increase in the use of electronic media and instant messaging among healthcare professionals, where it has been almost universally adopted in the workplace. The use of WhatsApp and its perceived benefits in healthcare have been extensively studied; however, there are concerns regarding the potential for ethical breaches in confidentiality through shared electronic patient information. Objectives. To identify the usage characteristics and incidence of shared patient information with WhatsApp use in a team of medical doctors in an unobserved and unregulated setting. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional content analysis of WhatsApp messages (n=3 340) among a team of 20 doctors in a South African district hospital over 6 months. All messages found within this time period were allocated unique identifiers. The text and image messages were thematically grouped into four categories, i.e. clinical care, resource allocation, social and administrative. Messages that contained patient-identifying information were included in the analysis. Results. Of a total of 3 340 messages sent, 220 (6.6%) contained patient-identifying information. Of these, 109 (3.3%) contained nonanonymised patient information, while in 111 (3.3%) messages, the information was anonymised. The likelihood of sharing patient identifiers was proportionally much higher in shared images (odds ratio (OR) 5.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-8.2; p&lt;0.0001) compared with text messages, and in messages that related to clinical care (OR 9.3; 95% CI 2.2-38.8; p=0.0023) compared with those sent for resource allocation, and social or administrative purposes. Conclusions. Non-anonymised patient identifiers were found in 3.3% of messages, constituting the potential for breaching patient confidentiality. While WhatsApp groups have significant utility in co-ordinating aspects of clinical care, resource allocation, as well as social and administrative functions, the safe use of WhatsApp should be promoted to ensure that patient confidentiality is maintained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0256-9574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2078-5135</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i2.14453</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Health &amp; Medical Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Confidential communications ; Ethical aspects ; Instant messaging software ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Physician and patient ; Physicians ; Technology application</subject><ispartof>South African medical journal, 2021-02, Vol.111 (2), p.171</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Health &amp; Medical Publishing Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-96927bf3e985d14bac3cc2ac50a626e306d431273566271a04a39e19f3239f9e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meyer, G.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>du Toit, J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mans, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moffett, B.D</creatorcontrib><title>WhatsApp-propriate? A retrospective content analysis of WhatsApp use and potential breaches in confidentiality among a team of doctors at a district hospital, South Africa</title><title>South African medical journal</title><description>Background. There has been a steady increase in the use of electronic media and instant messaging among healthcare professionals, where it has been almost universally adopted in the workplace. The use of WhatsApp and its perceived benefits in healthcare have been extensively studied; however, there are concerns regarding the potential for ethical breaches in confidentiality through shared electronic patient information. Objectives. To identify the usage characteristics and incidence of shared patient information with WhatsApp use in a team of medical doctors in an unobserved and unregulated setting. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional content analysis of WhatsApp messages (n=3 340) among a team of 20 doctors in a South African district hospital over 6 months. All messages found within this time period were allocated unique identifiers. The text and image messages were thematically grouped into four categories, i.e. clinical care, resource allocation, social and administrative. Messages that contained patient-identifying information were included in the analysis. Results. Of a total of 3 340 messages sent, 220 (6.6%) contained patient-identifying information. Of these, 109 (3.3%) contained nonanonymised patient information, while in 111 (3.3%) messages, the information was anonymised. The likelihood of sharing patient identifiers was proportionally much higher in shared images (odds ratio (OR) 5.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-8.2; p&lt;0.0001) compared with text messages, and in messages that related to clinical care (OR 9.3; 95% CI 2.2-38.8; p=0.0023) compared with those sent for resource allocation, and social or administrative purposes. Conclusions. Non-anonymised patient identifiers were found in 3.3% of messages, constituting the potential for breaching patient confidentiality. While WhatsApp groups have significant utility in co-ordinating aspects of clinical care, resource allocation, as well as social and administrative functions, the safe use of WhatsApp should be promoted to ensure that patient confidentiality is maintained.</description><subject>Confidential communications</subject><subject>Ethical aspects</subject><subject>Instant messaging software</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Physician and patient</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><issn>0256-9574</issn><issn>2078-5135</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkV2L1TAQhosoeFz9CxIQvLI13z25krL4scuKF6t4Weakk22kbUqSs3B-k3_S1KPggsxFmJn3fYfwVNVLRpuWGf32tvt83XDKWXPPGPO8YVIq8ajacdrua8WEelztKFe6NqqVT6tnKf2gpVdG76qf30fIqVvXeo1hjR4yviMdiZhjSCva7O-R2LBkXDKBBaZT8okER_76yDFhWQxkDZvGw0QOEcGOmIhfNqvzw3nh84nAHJY7AiQjzFvMEGwOMREo6WTwKUdvMxnLbZ9hekNuwzGPpHNlDM-rJw6mhC_-vBfVtw_vv15-qm--fLy67G5qK-U-10Yb3h6cQLNXA5MHsMJaDlZR0FyjoHqQgvFWKK15y4BKEAaZcYIL4wyKi-rVOfcOJuz94kKOYGefbN9ppWRrpJFF1fxHVWrA2Zdvo_Nl_sDw-h_DiDDlMYXpmH1Y0kOhPgttYZAiur6AmSGeekb7DXm_Ie835P0Zef8bufgFkwahog</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Meyer, G.D</creator><creator>Meyer, N</creator><creator>du Toit, J.D</creator><creator>Mans, P.A</creator><creator>Moffett, B.D</creator><general>Health &amp; Medical Publishing Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>WhatsApp-propriate? A retrospective content analysis of WhatsApp use and potential breaches in confidentiality among a team of doctors at a district hospital, South Africa</title><author>Meyer, G.D ; Meyer, N ; du Toit, J.D ; Mans, P.A ; Moffett, B.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-96927bf3e985d14bac3cc2ac50a626e306d431273566271a04a39e19f3239f9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Confidential communications</topic><topic>Ethical aspects</topic><topic>Instant messaging software</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Physician and patient</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meyer, G.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>du Toit, J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mans, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moffett, B.D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>South African medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meyer, G.D</au><au>Meyer, N</au><au>du Toit, J.D</au><au>Mans, P.A</au><au>Moffett, B.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>WhatsApp-propriate? A retrospective content analysis of WhatsApp use and potential breaches in confidentiality among a team of doctors at a district hospital, South Africa</atitle><jtitle>South African medical journal</jtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>171</spage><pages>171-</pages><issn>0256-9574</issn><eissn>2078-5135</eissn><abstract>Background. There has been a steady increase in the use of electronic media and instant messaging among healthcare professionals, where it has been almost universally adopted in the workplace. The use of WhatsApp and its perceived benefits in healthcare have been extensively studied; however, there are concerns regarding the potential for ethical breaches in confidentiality through shared electronic patient information. Objectives. To identify the usage characteristics and incidence of shared patient information with WhatsApp use in a team of medical doctors in an unobserved and unregulated setting. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional content analysis of WhatsApp messages (n=3 340) among a team of 20 doctors in a South African district hospital over 6 months. All messages found within this time period were allocated unique identifiers. The text and image messages were thematically grouped into four categories, i.e. clinical care, resource allocation, social and administrative. Messages that contained patient-identifying information were included in the analysis. Results. Of a total of 3 340 messages sent, 220 (6.6%) contained patient-identifying information. Of these, 109 (3.3%) contained nonanonymised patient information, while in 111 (3.3%) messages, the information was anonymised. The likelihood of sharing patient identifiers was proportionally much higher in shared images (odds ratio (OR) 5.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-8.2; p&lt;0.0001) compared with text messages, and in messages that related to clinical care (OR 9.3; 95% CI 2.2-38.8; p=0.0023) compared with those sent for resource allocation, and social or administrative purposes. Conclusions. Non-anonymised patient identifiers were found in 3.3% of messages, constituting the potential for breaching patient confidentiality. While WhatsApp groups have significant utility in co-ordinating aspects of clinical care, resource allocation, as well as social and administrative functions, the safe use of WhatsApp should be promoted to ensure that patient confidentiality is maintained.</abstract><pub>Health &amp; Medical Publishing Group</pub><doi>10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i2.14453</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0256-9574
ispartof South African medical journal, 2021-02, Vol.111 (2), p.171
issn 0256-9574
2078-5135
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A655479494
source Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Confidential communications
Ethical aspects
Instant messaging software
Laws, regulations and rules
Physician and patient
Physicians
Technology application
title WhatsApp-propriate? A retrospective content analysis of WhatsApp use and potential breaches in confidentiality among a team of doctors at a district hospital, South Africa
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A28%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=WhatsApp-propriate?%20A%20retrospective%20content%20analysis%20of%20WhatsApp%20use%20and%20potential%20breaches%20in%20confidentiality%20among%20a%20team%20of%20doctors%20at%20a%20district%20hospital,%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Meyer,%20G.D&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=171&rft.pages=171-&rft.issn=0256-9574&rft.eissn=2078-5135&rft_id=info:doi/10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i2.14453&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA655479494%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-96927bf3e985d14bac3cc2ac50a626e306d431273566271a04a39e19f3239f9e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A655479494&rfr_iscdi=true