Loading…
Does automated breast ultrasound in assessment of lesions in dense breasts?
Background As mammography has its known limitations in dense breast, additional imaging is usually needed. We aimed to evaluate the role of automated breast ultrasound in addition to tomosynthesis in detection and diagnosis of breast lesions in dense breasts. Seventy patients with dense breasts subj...
Saved in:
Published in: | Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine 2021-08, Vol.52 (1) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Hegazy, Rania Mohamed Nada, Omnia Mokhtar Ali, Engy A |
description | Background As mammography has its known limitations in dense breast, additional imaging is usually needed. We aimed to evaluate the role of automated breast ultrasound in addition to tomosynthesis in detection and diagnosis of breast lesions in dense breasts. Seventy patients with dense breasts subjected to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) including digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and automated breast ultrasound (ABUS). Both studies were evaluated by two experienced radiologists to assess breast composition, mass characterization, asymmetry, calcification, axillary lymphadenopathy, extent of disease (EOD), skin thickening, retraction, architectural distortion, and BIRADS classification. All breast masses were interpreted as above described and then correlated with final pathological diagnosis. Results Study included 70 females presenting with different types of breast lesions. Eighty-two masses were detected: 53 benign (n = 53/82), 29 malignant (n = 29/82). Histopathology of the masses was reached by core biopsy (n = 30), FNAC (n = 14), and excisional biopsy (n = 11). The rest of the masses (n = 27/82) were confirmed by their characteristic sonographic appearances; 20 cases of multiple bilateral anechoic simple cysts, 7 typical fibroadenomas showed stationary course on follow-up. As regards the final BIRADS score given for both modalities, tomosynthesis showed accuracy of 93.1% in characterization of malignant masses with accuracy of 94.3% in benign masses, on the other hand automated ultrasound showed 100% accuracy in characterization of malignant masses with 98.1% accuracy in benign masses. Conclusion Adding ABUS to tomosynthesis has proven a valuable imaging tool for characterization of breast lesions in dense breasts both as screening and diagnostic tool. They proved to be more sensitive and specific than digital mammography alone in showing tissue overlap, tumor characterization, lesion margins, extent, and multiplicity of malignant lesions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s43055-021-00556-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A680228634</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A680228634</galeid><sourcerecordid>A680228634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g674-465d5023efe552435bbaf0f20a33068815a71b7efca6ecb39025a61ad3e60a9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptTrtOw0AQvAIkopAfoDqJ-sLe006FovAIIhJNCrpo7duLjOw7Kev8P0akoGC3mNHszGiFuNOw1LoOD-wseK_AaAUTCcpdiRnYqlYB7OeNWDB_wTQOQAc3E-9PhVjieSwDjhRlcyLkUZ778YRczjnKLktkJuaB8ihLkj1xVzL_HCJlpkuGH2_FdcKeaXHBudi_PO83W7X7eH3brHfqGCqnXPDRg7GUyHvjrG8aTJAMoLUQ6lp7rHRTUWoxUNvYFRiPQWO0FABXZOfi_rf2iD0dupzK9Gs7dNwe1qEGY-pg3eRa_uOaNtLQtSVT6ib9T-AbXENeCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does automated breast ultrasound in assessment of lesions in dense breasts?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access </source><creator>Hegazy, Rania Mohamed ; Nada, Omnia Mokhtar ; Ali, Engy A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hegazy, Rania Mohamed ; Nada, Omnia Mokhtar ; Ali, Engy A</creatorcontrib><description>Background As mammography has its known limitations in dense breast, additional imaging is usually needed. We aimed to evaluate the role of automated breast ultrasound in addition to tomosynthesis in detection and diagnosis of breast lesions in dense breasts. Seventy patients with dense breasts subjected to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) including digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and automated breast ultrasound (ABUS). Both studies were evaluated by two experienced radiologists to assess breast composition, mass characterization, asymmetry, calcification, axillary lymphadenopathy, extent of disease (EOD), skin thickening, retraction, architectural distortion, and BIRADS classification. All breast masses were interpreted as above described and then correlated with final pathological diagnosis. Results Study included 70 females presenting with different types of breast lesions. Eighty-two masses were detected: 53 benign (n = 53/82), 29 malignant (n = 29/82). Histopathology of the masses was reached by core biopsy (n = 30), FNAC (n = 14), and excisional biopsy (n = 11). The rest of the masses (n = 27/82) were confirmed by their characteristic sonographic appearances; 20 cases of multiple bilateral anechoic simple cysts, 7 typical fibroadenomas showed stationary course on follow-up. As regards the final BIRADS score given for both modalities, tomosynthesis showed accuracy of 93.1% in characterization of malignant masses with accuracy of 94.3% in benign masses, on the other hand automated ultrasound showed 100% accuracy in characterization of malignant masses with 98.1% accuracy in benign masses. Conclusion Adding ABUS to tomosynthesis has proven a valuable imaging tool for characterization of breast lesions in dense breasts both as screening and diagnostic tool. They proved to be more sensitive and specific than digital mammography alone in showing tissue overlap, tumor characterization, lesion margins, extent, and multiplicity of malignant lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-603X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s43055-021-00556-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer</publisher><subject>Histochemistry ; Imaging systems ; Mammography ; Skin ; Technology application</subject><ispartof>Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine, 2021-08, Vol.52 (1)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hegazy, Rania Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nada, Omnia Mokhtar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Engy A</creatorcontrib><title>Does automated breast ultrasound in assessment of lesions in dense breasts?</title><title>Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine</title><description>Background As mammography has its known limitations in dense breast, additional imaging is usually needed. We aimed to evaluate the role of automated breast ultrasound in addition to tomosynthesis in detection and diagnosis of breast lesions in dense breasts. Seventy patients with dense breasts subjected to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) including digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and automated breast ultrasound (ABUS). Both studies were evaluated by two experienced radiologists to assess breast composition, mass characterization, asymmetry, calcification, axillary lymphadenopathy, extent of disease (EOD), skin thickening, retraction, architectural distortion, and BIRADS classification. All breast masses were interpreted as above described and then correlated with final pathological diagnosis. Results Study included 70 females presenting with different types of breast lesions. Eighty-two masses were detected: 53 benign (n = 53/82), 29 malignant (n = 29/82). Histopathology of the masses was reached by core biopsy (n = 30), FNAC (n = 14), and excisional biopsy (n = 11). The rest of the masses (n = 27/82) were confirmed by their characteristic sonographic appearances; 20 cases of multiple bilateral anechoic simple cysts, 7 typical fibroadenomas showed stationary course on follow-up. As regards the final BIRADS score given for both modalities, tomosynthesis showed accuracy of 93.1% in characterization of malignant masses with accuracy of 94.3% in benign masses, on the other hand automated ultrasound showed 100% accuracy in characterization of malignant masses with 98.1% accuracy in benign masses. Conclusion Adding ABUS to tomosynthesis has proven a valuable imaging tool for characterization of breast lesions in dense breasts both as screening and diagnostic tool. They proved to be more sensitive and specific than digital mammography alone in showing tissue overlap, tumor characterization, lesion margins, extent, and multiplicity of malignant lesions.</description><subject>Histochemistry</subject><subject>Imaging systems</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><issn>0378-603X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptTrtOw0AQvAIkopAfoDqJ-sLe006FovAIIhJNCrpo7duLjOw7Kev8P0akoGC3mNHszGiFuNOw1LoOD-wseK_AaAUTCcpdiRnYqlYB7OeNWDB_wTQOQAc3E-9PhVjieSwDjhRlcyLkUZ778YRczjnKLktkJuaB8ihLkj1xVzL_HCJlpkuGH2_FdcKeaXHBudi_PO83W7X7eH3brHfqGCqnXPDRg7GUyHvjrG8aTJAMoLUQ6lp7rHRTUWoxUNvYFRiPQWO0FABXZOfi_rf2iD0dupzK9Gs7dNwe1qEGY-pg3eRa_uOaNtLQtSVT6ib9T-AbXENeCw</recordid><startdate>20210812</startdate><enddate>20210812</enddate><creator>Hegazy, Rania Mohamed</creator><creator>Nada, Omnia Mokhtar</creator><creator>Ali, Engy A</creator><general>Springer</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20210812</creationdate><title>Does automated breast ultrasound in assessment of lesions in dense breasts?</title><author>Hegazy, Rania Mohamed ; Nada, Omnia Mokhtar ; Ali, Engy A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g674-465d5023efe552435bbaf0f20a33068815a71b7efca6ecb39025a61ad3e60a9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Histochemistry</topic><topic>Imaging systems</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hegazy, Rania Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nada, Omnia Mokhtar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Engy A</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hegazy, Rania Mohamed</au><au>Nada, Omnia Mokhtar</au><au>Ali, Engy A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does automated breast ultrasound in assessment of lesions in dense breasts?</atitle><jtitle>Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine</jtitle><date>2021-08-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0378-603X</issn><abstract>Background As mammography has its known limitations in dense breast, additional imaging is usually needed. We aimed to evaluate the role of automated breast ultrasound in addition to tomosynthesis in detection and diagnosis of breast lesions in dense breasts. Seventy patients with dense breasts subjected to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) including digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and automated breast ultrasound (ABUS). Both studies were evaluated by two experienced radiologists to assess breast composition, mass characterization, asymmetry, calcification, axillary lymphadenopathy, extent of disease (EOD), skin thickening, retraction, architectural distortion, and BIRADS classification. All breast masses were interpreted as above described and then correlated with final pathological diagnosis. Results Study included 70 females presenting with different types of breast lesions. Eighty-two masses were detected: 53 benign (n = 53/82), 29 malignant (n = 29/82). Histopathology of the masses was reached by core biopsy (n = 30), FNAC (n = 14), and excisional biopsy (n = 11). The rest of the masses (n = 27/82) were confirmed by their characteristic sonographic appearances; 20 cases of multiple bilateral anechoic simple cysts, 7 typical fibroadenomas showed stationary course on follow-up. As regards the final BIRADS score given for both modalities, tomosynthesis showed accuracy of 93.1% in characterization of malignant masses with accuracy of 94.3% in benign masses, on the other hand automated ultrasound showed 100% accuracy in characterization of malignant masses with 98.1% accuracy in benign masses. Conclusion Adding ABUS to tomosynthesis has proven a valuable imaging tool for characterization of breast lesions in dense breasts both as screening and diagnostic tool. They proved to be more sensitive and specific than digital mammography alone in showing tissue overlap, tumor characterization, lesion margins, extent, and multiplicity of malignant lesions.</abstract><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1186/s43055-021-00556-4</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-603X |
ispartof | Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine, 2021-08, Vol.52 (1) |
issn | 0378-603X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A680228634 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | Histochemistry Imaging systems Mammography Skin Technology application |
title | Does automated breast ultrasound in assessment of lesions in dense breasts? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A12%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20automated%20breast%20ultrasound%20in%20assessment%20of%20lesions%20in%20dense%20breasts?&rft.jtitle=Egyptian%20journal%20of%20radiology%20and%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=Hegazy,%20Rania%20Mohamed&rft.date=2021-08-12&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0378-603X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s43055-021-00556-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA680228634%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g674-465d5023efe552435bbaf0f20a33068815a71b7efca6ecb39025a61ad3e60a9e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A680228634&rfr_iscdi=true |