Loading…

Effect of Prone Positioning on Clinical Outcomes of Non-Intubated Subjects WithCOVID-19

BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning (APP) has been recently proposed as an adjunctive treatment for non-intubated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients requiring oxygen therapy to improve oxygenation and reduce the risk of intubation. However, the magnitude of the effect of APP on clinical ou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Respiratory care 2022-04, Vol.67 (4), p.471
Main Authors: Beran, Azizullah, Mhanna, Mohammed, Srour, Omar, Ayesh, Hazem, Sajdeya, Omar, Ghazaleh, Sami, Mhanna, Asmaa, Ghazaleh, Dana, Khokher, Waleed, Maqsood, Aadil, Assaly, Ragheb
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 471
container_title Respiratory care
container_volume 67
creator Beran, Azizullah
Mhanna, Mohammed
Srour, Omar
Ayesh, Hazem
Sajdeya, Omar
Ghazaleh, Sami
Mhanna, Asmaa
Ghazaleh, Dana
Khokher, Waleed
Maqsood, Aadil
Assaly, Ragheb
description BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning (APP) has been recently proposed as an adjunctive treatment for non-intubated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients requiring oxygen therapy to improve oxygenation and reduce the risk of intubation. However, the magnitude of the effect of APP on clinical outcomes in these patients remains uncertain. We performed a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of APP to improve the clinical outcomes in non-intubated subjects with COVID-19. METHODS: The primary outcomes were the need for endotracheal intubation and mortality. The secondary outcome was hospital length of stay. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference with the corresponding 95% CI were obtained by the Mantel-Haenszel method within a random-effect model. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies (5 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 9 observational studies) involving 3,324 subjects (1,495 received APP and 1,829 did not) were included. There was a significant reduction in the mortality rate in APP group compared to control (RR 0.68 [95% CI 0.51-0.90]; P = .008, [I.sup.2] = 52%) with no significant effect on intubation (RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.66-1.08]; P = .17, [I.sup.2] = 63%) or hospital length of stay (mean difference -3.09 d [95% CI-10.14-3.96]; P = .39, [I.sup.2] = 97%). Subgroup analysis of RCTs showed significant reduction in intubation rate (RR 0.83 [95% CI 0.72-0.97]; P = .02, [I.sup.2] = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: APP has the potential to reduce the in-hospital mortality rate in COVID-19 subjects with hypoxemia without a significant effect on the need for intubation or length of hospital stay. However, there was a significant decrease in the need for intubation on subgroup analysis of RCTs. More large-scale trials with a standardized protocol for prone positioning are needed to better evaluate its effectiveness in this select population. Key words: awake prone positioning; intubation; mortality; ICU admission; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2. [Respir Care 2022;67(4):471-479. [c] 2022 Daedalus Enterprises]
doi_str_mv 10.4187/respcare.09362
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A700999339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A700999339</galeid><sourcerecordid>A700999339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g989-fb24d32e859cb48d42948f49b6f730c3ed983d934abc1a35cad073949938ab323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEFLAzEQhXNQsFavngOCt63ZJO1mjmWttVBswWKPJckmbco2kU32_5uihwoyh-EN33vwBqGHkox4KarnzsQvLTszIsAm9AoNCKGkKBnlN-g2xmOWEz6GAdrOrDU64WDxugve4HWILrngnd_j4HHdOu-0bPGqTzqcTDyT78EXC596JZNp8Eevjjki4q1Lh3r1uXgpSrhD11a20dz_7iHavM429VuxXM0X9XRZ7EFAYRXlDaNGjEErLhpOgQvLQU1sxYhmpgHBGmBcKl1KNtayIRUDDsCEVIyyIXr8id3L1uyctyF1Up9c1LtpRQhkkEGmRv9QeRpzcjq3ti7f_xieLgwHI9t0iKHtz4-Jl-A3iA1tdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Prone Positioning on Clinical Outcomes of Non-Intubated Subjects WithCOVID-19</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Beran, Azizullah ; Mhanna, Mohammed ; Srour, Omar ; Ayesh, Hazem ; Sajdeya, Omar ; Ghazaleh, Sami ; Mhanna, Asmaa ; Ghazaleh, Dana ; Khokher, Waleed ; Maqsood, Aadil ; Assaly, Ragheb</creator><creatorcontrib>Beran, Azizullah ; Mhanna, Mohammed ; Srour, Omar ; Ayesh, Hazem ; Sajdeya, Omar ; Ghazaleh, Sami ; Mhanna, Asmaa ; Ghazaleh, Dana ; Khokher, Waleed ; Maqsood, Aadil ; Assaly, Ragheb</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning (APP) has been recently proposed as an adjunctive treatment for non-intubated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients requiring oxygen therapy to improve oxygenation and reduce the risk of intubation. However, the magnitude of the effect of APP on clinical outcomes in these patients remains uncertain. We performed a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of APP to improve the clinical outcomes in non-intubated subjects with COVID-19. METHODS: The primary outcomes were the need for endotracheal intubation and mortality. The secondary outcome was hospital length of stay. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference with the corresponding 95% CI were obtained by the Mantel-Haenszel method within a random-effect model. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies (5 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 9 observational studies) involving 3,324 subjects (1,495 received APP and 1,829 did not) were included. There was a significant reduction in the mortality rate in APP group compared to control (RR 0.68 [95% CI 0.51-0.90]; P = .008, [I.sup.2] = 52%) with no significant effect on intubation (RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.66-1.08]; P = .17, [I.sup.2] = 63%) or hospital length of stay (mean difference -3.09 d [95% CI-10.14-3.96]; P = .39, [I.sup.2] = 97%). Subgroup analysis of RCTs showed significant reduction in intubation rate (RR 0.83 [95% CI 0.72-0.97]; P = .02, [I.sup.2] = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: APP has the potential to reduce the in-hospital mortality rate in COVID-19 subjects with hypoxemia without a significant effect on the need for intubation or length of hospital stay. However, there was a significant decrease in the need for intubation on subgroup analysis of RCTs. More large-scale trials with a standardized protocol for prone positioning are needed to better evaluate its effectiveness in this select population. Key words: awake prone positioning; intubation; mortality; ICU admission; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2. [Respir Care 2022;67(4):471-479. [c] 2022 Daedalus Enterprises]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1324</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</publisher><subject>Methods ; Oxygen therapy ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Positioning</subject><ispartof>Respiratory care, 2022-04, Vol.67 (4), p.471</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beran, Azizullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mhanna, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srour, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayesh, Hazem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sajdeya, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazaleh, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mhanna, Asmaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazaleh, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khokher, Waleed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maqsood, Aadil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assaly, Ragheb</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Prone Positioning on Clinical Outcomes of Non-Intubated Subjects WithCOVID-19</title><title>Respiratory care</title><description>BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning (APP) has been recently proposed as an adjunctive treatment for non-intubated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients requiring oxygen therapy to improve oxygenation and reduce the risk of intubation. However, the magnitude of the effect of APP on clinical outcomes in these patients remains uncertain. We performed a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of APP to improve the clinical outcomes in non-intubated subjects with COVID-19. METHODS: The primary outcomes were the need for endotracheal intubation and mortality. The secondary outcome was hospital length of stay. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference with the corresponding 95% CI were obtained by the Mantel-Haenszel method within a random-effect model. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies (5 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 9 observational studies) involving 3,324 subjects (1,495 received APP and 1,829 did not) were included. There was a significant reduction in the mortality rate in APP group compared to control (RR 0.68 [95% CI 0.51-0.90]; P = .008, [I.sup.2] = 52%) with no significant effect on intubation (RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.66-1.08]; P = .17, [I.sup.2] = 63%) or hospital length of stay (mean difference -3.09 d [95% CI-10.14-3.96]; P = .39, [I.sup.2] = 97%). Subgroup analysis of RCTs showed significant reduction in intubation rate (RR 0.83 [95% CI 0.72-0.97]; P = .02, [I.sup.2] = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: APP has the potential to reduce the in-hospital mortality rate in COVID-19 subjects with hypoxemia without a significant effect on the need for intubation or length of hospital stay. However, there was a significant decrease in the need for intubation on subgroup analysis of RCTs. More large-scale trials with a standardized protocol for prone positioning are needed to better evaluate its effectiveness in this select population. Key words: awake prone positioning; intubation; mortality; ICU admission; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2. [Respir Care 2022;67(4):471-479. [c] 2022 Daedalus Enterprises]</description><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Oxygen therapy</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Positioning</subject><issn>0020-1324</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptkEFLAzEQhXNQsFavngOCt63ZJO1mjmWttVBswWKPJckmbco2kU32_5uihwoyh-EN33vwBqGHkox4KarnzsQvLTszIsAm9AoNCKGkKBnlN-g2xmOWEz6GAdrOrDU64WDxugve4HWILrngnd_j4HHdOu-0bPGqTzqcTDyT78EXC596JZNp8Eevjjki4q1Lh3r1uXgpSrhD11a20dz_7iHavM429VuxXM0X9XRZ7EFAYRXlDaNGjEErLhpOgQvLQU1sxYhmpgHBGmBcKl1KNtayIRUDDsCEVIyyIXr8id3L1uyctyF1Up9c1LtpRQhkkEGmRv9QeRpzcjq3ti7f_xieLgwHI9t0iKHtz4-Jl-A3iA1tdg</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Beran, Azizullah</creator><creator>Mhanna, Mohammed</creator><creator>Srour, Omar</creator><creator>Ayesh, Hazem</creator><creator>Sajdeya, Omar</creator><creator>Ghazaleh, Sami</creator><creator>Mhanna, Asmaa</creator><creator>Ghazaleh, Dana</creator><creator>Khokher, Waleed</creator><creator>Maqsood, Aadil</creator><creator>Assaly, Ragheb</creator><general>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Effect of Prone Positioning on Clinical Outcomes of Non-Intubated Subjects WithCOVID-19</title><author>Beran, Azizullah ; Mhanna, Mohammed ; Srour, Omar ; Ayesh, Hazem ; Sajdeya, Omar ; Ghazaleh, Sami ; Mhanna, Asmaa ; Ghazaleh, Dana ; Khokher, Waleed ; Maqsood, Aadil ; Assaly, Ragheb</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g989-fb24d32e859cb48d42948f49b6f730c3ed983d934abc1a35cad073949938ab323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Oxygen therapy</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Positioning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beran, Azizullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mhanna, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srour, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayesh, Hazem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sajdeya, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazaleh, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mhanna, Asmaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazaleh, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khokher, Waleed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maqsood, Aadil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assaly, Ragheb</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beran, Azizullah</au><au>Mhanna, Mohammed</au><au>Srour, Omar</au><au>Ayesh, Hazem</au><au>Sajdeya, Omar</au><au>Ghazaleh, Sami</au><au>Mhanna, Asmaa</au><au>Ghazaleh, Dana</au><au>Khokher, Waleed</au><au>Maqsood, Aadil</au><au>Assaly, Ragheb</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Prone Positioning on Clinical Outcomes of Non-Intubated Subjects WithCOVID-19</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>471</spage><pages>471-</pages><issn>0020-1324</issn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning (APP) has been recently proposed as an adjunctive treatment for non-intubated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients requiring oxygen therapy to improve oxygenation and reduce the risk of intubation. However, the magnitude of the effect of APP on clinical outcomes in these patients remains uncertain. We performed a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of APP to improve the clinical outcomes in non-intubated subjects with COVID-19. METHODS: The primary outcomes were the need for endotracheal intubation and mortality. The secondary outcome was hospital length of stay. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference with the corresponding 95% CI were obtained by the Mantel-Haenszel method within a random-effect model. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies (5 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 9 observational studies) involving 3,324 subjects (1,495 received APP and 1,829 did not) were included. There was a significant reduction in the mortality rate in APP group compared to control (RR 0.68 [95% CI 0.51-0.90]; P = .008, [I.sup.2] = 52%) with no significant effect on intubation (RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.66-1.08]; P = .17, [I.sup.2] = 63%) or hospital length of stay (mean difference -3.09 d [95% CI-10.14-3.96]; P = .39, [I.sup.2] = 97%). Subgroup analysis of RCTs showed significant reduction in intubation rate (RR 0.83 [95% CI 0.72-0.97]; P = .02, [I.sup.2] = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: APP has the potential to reduce the in-hospital mortality rate in COVID-19 subjects with hypoxemia without a significant effect on the need for intubation or length of hospital stay. However, there was a significant decrease in the need for intubation on subgroup analysis of RCTs. More large-scale trials with a standardized protocol for prone positioning are needed to better evaluate its effectiveness in this select population. Key words: awake prone positioning; intubation; mortality; ICU admission; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2. [Respir Care 2022;67(4):471-479. [c] 2022 Daedalus Enterprises]</abstract><pub>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</pub><doi>10.4187/respcare.09362</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1324
ispartof Respiratory care, 2022-04, Vol.67 (4), p.471
issn 0020-1324
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A700999339
source PubMed Central
subjects Methods
Oxygen therapy
Patient outcomes
Patients
Positioning
title Effect of Prone Positioning on Clinical Outcomes of Non-Intubated Subjects WithCOVID-19
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A41%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Prone%20Positioning%20on%20Clinical%20Outcomes%20of%20Non-Intubated%20Subjects%20WithCOVID-19&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20care&rft.au=Beran,%20Azizullah&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=471&rft.pages=471-&rft.issn=0020-1324&rft_id=info:doi/10.4187/respcare.09362&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA700999339%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g989-fb24d32e859cb48d42948f49b6f730c3ed983d934abc1a35cad073949938ab323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A700999339&rfr_iscdi=true