Accuracy of different sonomammographic imaging modalities in assessment of breast tumor size

• Published in: Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine 2022-06, Vol.53 (1), p.1-9
• Main Authors: Kandil, Nour Mohamed Mahmoud, Hashem, Lamiaa Mohamed Bassam, Gareer, Sherihan W. Y, Hashem, Aya Mohamed Bassam
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Breast; Breast cancer; Comparative analysis; Diagnosis; Health aspects; Imaging modalities; Prognosis; Sonomammography; Tumor size
• ISSN: 0378-603X; 2090-4762
• DOI: 10.1186/s43055-022-00804-1

Background Accurate breast cancer size is crucial for staging and an important prognostic factor in patient management. Therapeutic decisions heavily depend on tumor size detection by radiological imaging. The purpose of our prospective comparative study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of different sonomammographic breast imaging modalities, namely DM, DBT, CESM, 2D US and 3D US in the preoperative tumor size measurement. Results CESM, 3D US and 2D US achieved moderately strong correlation with the pathological size measurements, while (DM) and (DBT) showed fair correlation with the pathology. CESM showed the highest correlation coefficient (0.789), while (DBT) showed the lowest correlation coefficient (0.411). Regarding the agreement, there was good agreement of the size measured by CESM, 3D US and 2D US with the pathology as the ICC was (0.798), (0.769) and (0.624), respectively. The highest agreement with the pathology was achieved with CESM. The agreement of the size measured by (DM) and (DBT) with the pathology was moderate as the ICC was (0.439) and (0.416), respectively. The lowest agreement was achieved with the size measured by (DBT). Conclusions CESM and 3D US are more superior to DM, 2D US and DBT regarding preoperative size measurement. 3D US can be used as preoperative noninvasive technique, especially in patients with impaired renal function who cannot tolerate CESM.