Loading…

Combined conventional speech therapy and functional electrical stimulation in acute stroke patients with dysphagia: a randomized controlled trial

Background Stroke is the main cause of oropharyngeal neurogenic dysphagia. Electrostimulation has been used as a therapeutic tool in these cases. However, there are few studies that prove its effectiveness. We evaluated the effect of functional electrostimulation as a complement to conventional spee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC neurology 2022-06, Vol.22 (1)
Main Authors: Matos, Klayne Cunha, de Oliveira, Vanessa Fernandes, de Oliveira, Paula Luanna Carvalho, Carvalho, Fabíola Aureliano, de Mesquita, Maria Renata Matos, da Silva Queiroz, Camila Gabriella, Marques, Levi Mota, Lima, Débora Lilian Nascimento, Carvalho, Fernanda Ma, Braga-Neto, Pedro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Stroke is the main cause of oropharyngeal neurogenic dysphagia. Electrostimulation has been used as a therapeutic tool in these cases. However, there are few studies that prove its effectiveness. We evaluated the effect of functional electrostimulation as a complement to conventional speech therapy in patients with dysphagia after a stroke in a stroke unit. Methods We performed a clinical, randomized, and controlled trial divided into intervention group (IG) (n = 16) and control group (CG) (n = 17). All patients were treated with conventional speech therapy, and the IG also was submitted to the functional electrotherapy. Primary outcomes were Functional Oral Ingestion Scale (FOIS) and Swallowing videoendoscopy (FEES). The degree of dysphagia was scored in functional, mild, moderate and severe dysphagia according to FEES procedure. Dysphagia Risk Evaluation Protocol (DREP) was considered a secondary outcome. Results There was a significant difference regarding FOIS scores after 5 days of intervention in groups. Both groups also showed a tendency to improve dysphagia levels measured by FEES, although not statistically significant. Improvements on oral feeding was seen in both groups. No significant differences between groups before and after the intervention were detected by DREP scores. Electrical stimulation did not show additional benefits beyond conventional therapy when comparing outcomes between groups. Conclusion Conventional speech therapy improved oral ingestion even regardless the use of electrostimulation in a stroke unit. Trial registration This research was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03649295) in 28/08/2018 and in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) (Register Number: RBR-56QK5J), approval date: 18/12/2018. HGF Ethics Committee Approval Number: N. 2.388.931. Keywords: Dysphagia, Electrical stimulation, Rehabilitation, Speech therapy, Stroke
ISSN:1471-2377
1471-2377
DOI:10.1186/s12883-022-02753-8