Loading…

Indomethacin Pharmacodynamics Are Altered by Surfactant: A Possible Challenge to Current Indomethacin Dosing Guidelines Created Before Surfactant Availability

The effect of surfactant administration for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) on indomethacin (INDO) pharmacodynamics and dosing requirements for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure and renal toxicity was evaluated. A 22-year prospective cohort study including 442 INDO-treated patients given 46...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric cardiology 2010-05, Vol.31 (4), p.505-510
Main Authors: McPherson, Christopher, Gal, Peter, Ransom, J. Laurence, Carlos, Rita Q., Dimaguila, Mary Ann V. T., Smith, McCrae, Davonzo, Christie, Wimmer, John E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-f090cc5e3d1645957871f3335cde9b838dd4343a969fd83794365520a37ba95a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-f090cc5e3d1645957871f3335cde9b838dd4343a969fd83794365520a37ba95a3
container_end_page 510
container_issue 4
container_start_page 505
container_title Pediatric cardiology
container_volume 31
creator McPherson, Christopher
Gal, Peter
Ransom, J. Laurence
Carlos, Rita Q.
Dimaguila, Mary Ann V. T.
Smith, McCrae
Davonzo, Christie
Wimmer, John E.
description The effect of surfactant administration for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) on indomethacin (INDO) pharmacodynamics and dosing requirements for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure and renal toxicity was evaluated. A 22-year prospective cohort study including 442 INDO-treated patients given 466 INDO treatment courses. The database included demographic information, medical problems, and medications. Neonates with a PDA confirmed by echocardiography were treated with INDO, 0.25–0.3 mg/kg. Subsequent INDO dosing was based on a combined pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) approach. Data were fit to an Emax model and ANOVA was used to compare mean closure levels between groups. PDA closure was successful in 405 of 442 patients (91.6%) and in 434 of 466 treatment courses (93.1%) using an individualized PK/PD dosing approach. Renal toxicity was documented in 56 of 442 patients (12.7%) or 56 of 466 treatment courses (12.0%). Patients not treated with synthetic surfactant trended toward lower mean INDO concentrations at PDA closure compared to patients treated with synthetic surfactant (1.65 vs. 2.01 mg/l; P  > 0.05) and significantly lower mean INDO concentrations at PDA closure compared to patients treated with natural surfactant (1.65 vs. 2.15 mg/l; P  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00246-009-9628-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A715517302</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A715517302</galeid><sourcerecordid>A715517302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-f090cc5e3d1645957871f3335cde9b838dd4343a969fd83794365520a37ba95a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQhUVpaW7TPkA3RdC105Fl2VZ3rtumgUADSddClsb3KthykOTCfZk-axXcHwIhzEIwOt8ZOIeQtwzOGEDzIQKUVV0AyELWZVvUz8iOVbwsmGzYc7ID1pQF1BU_Ia9ivAWAFlrxkpyUADVnQu7IrwtvlxnTQRvn6dVBh1mbxR69np2JtAtIuylhQEuHI71ew6hN0j59pB29WmJ0w4S0P-hpQr9HmhbaryGgT_SB8eclOr-n56uzODmPkfYBdcqun3Bc8pH_zrT7qd2kBze5dHxNXox6ivjmz3tKfnz9ctN_Ky6_n1_03WVhKsFTMYIEYwRyy-pKSNG0DRs558JYlEPLW2srXnEtaznaljey4rUQJWjeDFoKzU_J-813rydUzo9LCtrMLhrVNUwI1nAos-rsEVUeizmtxePo8v4BwDbAhJxVwFHdBTfrcFQM1H2FaqtQ5QrVfYWqzsy7jblbhxntP-JvZ1lQboKYv3LoQd0ua_A5nidcfwOjcqdb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indomethacin Pharmacodynamics Are Altered by Surfactant: A Possible Challenge to Current Indomethacin Dosing Guidelines Created Before Surfactant Availability</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>McPherson, Christopher ; Gal, Peter ; Ransom, J. Laurence ; Carlos, Rita Q. ; Dimaguila, Mary Ann V. T. ; Smith, McCrae ; Davonzo, Christie ; Wimmer, John E.</creator><creatorcontrib>McPherson, Christopher ; Gal, Peter ; Ransom, J. Laurence ; Carlos, Rita Q. ; Dimaguila, Mary Ann V. T. ; Smith, McCrae ; Davonzo, Christie ; Wimmer, John E.</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of surfactant administration for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) on indomethacin (INDO) pharmacodynamics and dosing requirements for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure and renal toxicity was evaluated. A 22-year prospective cohort study including 442 INDO-treated patients given 466 INDO treatment courses. The database included demographic information, medical problems, and medications. Neonates with a PDA confirmed by echocardiography were treated with INDO, 0.25–0.3 mg/kg. Subsequent INDO dosing was based on a combined pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) approach. Data were fit to an Emax model and ANOVA was used to compare mean closure levels between groups. PDA closure was successful in 405 of 442 patients (91.6%) and in 434 of 466 treatment courses (93.1%) using an individualized PK/PD dosing approach. Renal toxicity was documented in 56 of 442 patients (12.7%) or 56 of 466 treatment courses (12.0%). Patients not treated with synthetic surfactant trended toward lower mean INDO concentrations at PDA closure compared to patients treated with synthetic surfactant (1.65 vs. 2.01 mg/l; P  &gt; 0.05) and significantly lower mean INDO concentrations at PDA closure compared to patients treated with natural surfactant (1.65 vs. 2.15 mg/l; P  &lt; 0.002). This requires an increased total dose of ~0.3 mg/kg or an individual dose increase of 0.1 mg/kg. Administration of natural or synthetic surfactant for RDS may increase the INDO concentrations and doses needed for PDA closure in premature infants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0172-0643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00246-009-9628-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20063159</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Analysis ; Animals ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - pharmacokinetics ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - toxicity ; Biological Availability ; Biological Products - administration & dosage ; Calfactant ; Cardiac Surgery ; Cardiology ; Care and treatment ; Cohort Studies ; Congenital heart disease ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug Combinations ; Drug Interactions ; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent - blood ; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent - diagnostic imaging ; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent - drug therapy ; Echocardiography ; Echocardiography, Doppler, Color ; Fatty Alcohols - administration & dosage ; Guideline Adherence ; Humans ; Indomethacin ; Indomethacin - administration & dosage ; Indomethacin - pharmacokinetics ; Indomethacin - toxicity ; Infant, Newborn ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal ; Kidney - drug effects ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Medicine, Experimental ; Metabolic Clearance Rate ; Neonatology ; Original Article ; Phosphorylcholine - administration & dosage ; Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage ; Prospective Studies ; Pulmonary Surfactants - administration & dosage ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - blood ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - diagnostic imaging ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - drug therapy ; Vascular Surgery]]></subject><ispartof>Pediatric cardiology, 2010-05, Vol.31 (4), p.505-510</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-f090cc5e3d1645957871f3335cde9b838dd4343a969fd83794365520a37ba95a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-f090cc5e3d1645957871f3335cde9b838dd4343a969fd83794365520a37ba95a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20063159$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McPherson, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gal, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ransom, J. Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlos, Rita Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimaguila, Mary Ann V. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, McCrae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davonzo, Christie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, John E.</creatorcontrib><title>Indomethacin Pharmacodynamics Are Altered by Surfactant: A Possible Challenge to Current Indomethacin Dosing Guidelines Created Before Surfactant Availability</title><title>Pediatric cardiology</title><addtitle>Pediatr Cardiol</addtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Cardiol</addtitle><description>The effect of surfactant administration for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) on indomethacin (INDO) pharmacodynamics and dosing requirements for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure and renal toxicity was evaluated. A 22-year prospective cohort study including 442 INDO-treated patients given 466 INDO treatment courses. The database included demographic information, medical problems, and medications. Neonates with a PDA confirmed by echocardiography were treated with INDO, 0.25–0.3 mg/kg. Subsequent INDO dosing was based on a combined pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) approach. Data were fit to an Emax model and ANOVA was used to compare mean closure levels between groups. PDA closure was successful in 405 of 442 patients (91.6%) and in 434 of 466 treatment courses (93.1%) using an individualized PK/PD dosing approach. Renal toxicity was documented in 56 of 442 patients (12.7%) or 56 of 466 treatment courses (12.0%). Patients not treated with synthetic surfactant trended toward lower mean INDO concentrations at PDA closure compared to patients treated with synthetic surfactant (1.65 vs. 2.01 mg/l; P  &gt; 0.05) and significantly lower mean INDO concentrations at PDA closure compared to patients treated with natural surfactant (1.65 vs. 2.15 mg/l; P  &lt; 0.002). This requires an increased total dose of ~0.3 mg/kg or an individual dose increase of 0.1 mg/kg. Administration of natural or synthetic surfactant for RDS may increase the INDO concentrations and doses needed for PDA closure in premature infants.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - toxicity</subject><subject>Biological Availability</subject><subject>Biological Products - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Calfactant</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgery</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Congenital heart disease</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Drug Interactions</subject><subject>Ductus Arteriosus, Patent - blood</subject><subject>Ductus Arteriosus, Patent - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ductus Arteriosus, Patent - drug therapy</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Doppler, Color</subject><subject>Fatty Alcohols - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indomethacin</subject><subject>Indomethacin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Indomethacin - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Indomethacin - toxicity</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</subject><subject>Kidney - drug effects</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Metabolic Clearance Rate</subject><subject>Neonatology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Phosphorylcholine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulmonary Surfactants - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - blood</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - drug therapy</subject><subject>Vascular Surgery</subject><issn>0172-0643</issn><issn>1432-1971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQhUVpaW7TPkA3RdC105Fl2VZ3rtumgUADSddClsb3KthykOTCfZk-axXcHwIhzEIwOt8ZOIeQtwzOGEDzIQKUVV0AyELWZVvUz8iOVbwsmGzYc7ID1pQF1BU_Ia9ivAWAFlrxkpyUADVnQu7IrwtvlxnTQRvn6dVBh1mbxR69np2JtAtIuylhQEuHI71ew6hN0j59pB29WmJ0w4S0P-hpQr9HmhbaryGgT_SB8eclOr-n56uzODmPkfYBdcqun3Bc8pH_zrT7qd2kBze5dHxNXox6ivjmz3tKfnz9ctN_Ky6_n1_03WVhKsFTMYIEYwRyy-pKSNG0DRs558JYlEPLW2srXnEtaznaljey4rUQJWjeDFoKzU_J-813rydUzo9LCtrMLhrVNUwI1nAos-rsEVUeizmtxePo8v4BwDbAhJxVwFHdBTfrcFQM1H2FaqtQ5QrVfYWqzsy7jblbhxntP-JvZ1lQboKYv3LoQd0ua_A5nidcfwOjcqdb</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>McPherson, Christopher</creator><creator>Gal, Peter</creator><creator>Ransom, J. Laurence</creator><creator>Carlos, Rita Q.</creator><creator>Dimaguila, Mary Ann V. T.</creator><creator>Smith, McCrae</creator><creator>Davonzo, Christie</creator><creator>Wimmer, John E.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Indomethacin Pharmacodynamics Are Altered by Surfactant: A Possible Challenge to Current Indomethacin Dosing Guidelines Created Before Surfactant Availability</title><author>McPherson, Christopher ; Gal, Peter ; Ransom, J. Laurence ; Carlos, Rita Q. ; Dimaguila, Mary Ann V. T. ; Smith, McCrae ; Davonzo, Christie ; Wimmer, John E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-f090cc5e3d1645957871f3335cde9b838dd4343a969fd83794365520a37ba95a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - toxicity</topic><topic>Biological Availability</topic><topic>Biological Products - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Calfactant</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgery</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Congenital heart disease</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Drug Interactions</topic><topic>Ductus Arteriosus, Patent - blood</topic><topic>Ductus Arteriosus, Patent - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ductus Arteriosus, Patent - drug therapy</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Doppler, Color</topic><topic>Fatty Alcohols - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indomethacin</topic><topic>Indomethacin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Indomethacin - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Indomethacin - toxicity</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</topic><topic>Kidney - drug effects</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Metabolic Clearance Rate</topic><topic>Neonatology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Phosphorylcholine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulmonary Surfactants - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - blood</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - drug therapy</topic><topic>Vascular Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McPherson, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gal, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ransom, J. Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlos, Rita Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimaguila, Mary Ann V. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, McCrae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davonzo, Christie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, John E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Pediatric cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McPherson, Christopher</au><au>Gal, Peter</au><au>Ransom, J. Laurence</au><au>Carlos, Rita Q.</au><au>Dimaguila, Mary Ann V. T.</au><au>Smith, McCrae</au><au>Davonzo, Christie</au><au>Wimmer, John E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indomethacin Pharmacodynamics Are Altered by Surfactant: A Possible Challenge to Current Indomethacin Dosing Guidelines Created Before Surfactant Availability</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric cardiology</jtitle><stitle>Pediatr Cardiol</stitle><addtitle>Pediatr Cardiol</addtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>510</epage><pages>505-510</pages><issn>0172-0643</issn><eissn>1432-1971</eissn><abstract>The effect of surfactant administration for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) on indomethacin (INDO) pharmacodynamics and dosing requirements for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure and renal toxicity was evaluated. A 22-year prospective cohort study including 442 INDO-treated patients given 466 INDO treatment courses. The database included demographic information, medical problems, and medications. Neonates with a PDA confirmed by echocardiography were treated with INDO, 0.25–0.3 mg/kg. Subsequent INDO dosing was based on a combined pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) approach. Data were fit to an Emax model and ANOVA was used to compare mean closure levels between groups. PDA closure was successful in 405 of 442 patients (91.6%) and in 434 of 466 treatment courses (93.1%) using an individualized PK/PD dosing approach. Renal toxicity was documented in 56 of 442 patients (12.7%) or 56 of 466 treatment courses (12.0%). Patients not treated with synthetic surfactant trended toward lower mean INDO concentrations at PDA closure compared to patients treated with synthetic surfactant (1.65 vs. 2.01 mg/l; P  &gt; 0.05) and significantly lower mean INDO concentrations at PDA closure compared to patients treated with natural surfactant (1.65 vs. 2.15 mg/l; P  &lt; 0.002). This requires an increased total dose of ~0.3 mg/kg or an individual dose increase of 0.1 mg/kg. Administration of natural or synthetic surfactant for RDS may increase the INDO concentrations and doses needed for PDA closure in premature infants.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20063159</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00246-009-9628-6</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0172-0643
ispartof Pediatric cardiology, 2010-05, Vol.31 (4), p.505-510
issn 0172-0643
1432-1971
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A715517302
source Springer Link
subjects Analysis
Animals
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - pharmacokinetics
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - toxicity
Biological Availability
Biological Products - administration & dosage
Calfactant
Cardiac Surgery
Cardiology
Care and treatment
Cohort Studies
Congenital heart disease
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Combinations
Drug Interactions
Ductus Arteriosus, Patent - blood
Ductus Arteriosus, Patent - diagnostic imaging
Ductus Arteriosus, Patent - drug therapy
Echocardiography
Echocardiography, Doppler, Color
Fatty Alcohols - administration & dosage
Guideline Adherence
Humans
Indomethacin
Indomethacin - administration & dosage
Indomethacin - pharmacokinetics
Indomethacin - toxicity
Infant, Newborn
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
Kidney - drug effects
Medical research
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Medicine, Experimental
Metabolic Clearance Rate
Neonatology
Original Article
Phosphorylcholine - administration & dosage
Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage
Prospective Studies
Pulmonary Surfactants - administration & dosage
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - blood
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - diagnostic imaging
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - drug therapy
Vascular Surgery
title Indomethacin Pharmacodynamics Are Altered by Surfactant: A Possible Challenge to Current Indomethacin Dosing Guidelines Created Before Surfactant Availability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A38%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indomethacin%20Pharmacodynamics%20Are%20Altered%20by%20Surfactant:%20A%20Possible%20Challenge%20to%20Current%20Indomethacin%20Dosing%20Guidelines%20Created%20Before%20Surfactant%20Availability&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20cardiology&rft.au=McPherson,%20Christopher&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=510&rft.pages=505-510&rft.issn=0172-0643&rft.eissn=1432-1971&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00246-009-9628-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA715517302%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-f090cc5e3d1645957871f3335cde9b838dd4343a969fd83794365520a37ba95a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/20063159&rft_galeid=A715517302&rfr_iscdi=true