A Prospective Comparative Evaluation of Handheld Ultrasound Examination in Women with Dense Breast

• Published in: Diagnostics (Basel) 2022-09, Vol.12 (9)
• Main Authors: Brunetti, Nicole, De Giorgis, Sara, Tosto, Simona, Garlaschi, Alessandro, Rescinito, Giuseppe, Massa, Barbara, Calabrese, Massimo, Tagliafico, Alberto Stefano
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Breast cancer; Comparative analysis; Diagnosis; Diagnosis, Ultrasonic; Equipment and supplies; Mammography
• ISSN: 2075-4418; 2075-4418
• DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092170

Mammography is the gold standard examination for breast cancer screening. In women with high breast density, mammography has reduced sensitivity. In these women, an additional screening option is often recommended. This study prospectively compared ABVS and HHUS in women with mammography-negative examinations and dense breasts. Materials and methods: N = 222 women were evaluated prospectively and consecutively between January 2019 and June 2019 (average age 53 years; range 39–89). McNemar’s test and ROC analysis were used with standard statistical software. We included in the study both symptomatic and asymptomatic women with dense breasts. Women included underwent both HHUS and ABVS after mammography with independent reading. Results: N = 33/222 (15%) women resulted in having breast cancer. Both ABVS and HHUS identified more cancers than standard mammography, and both HHUS and ABVS had false-positive examinations: n = 13 for HHUS and n = 12 for ABVS. We found that HHUS had better accuracy than ABVS. The AUC of the ROC was 0.788 (95% CI 0.687–0.890) for ABVS and 0.930 (95% CI 0.868–0.993) for HHUS. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: HHUS was more accurate in breast cancer detection than ABVS. Multicentric studies must confirm these data for supplemental imaging in women with dense breasts.