Effectiveness of mass trapping interventions using autocidal gravid ovitraps aegypti, in Northern Mexico

• Published in: Parasites & vectors 2024-08, Vol.17 (1)
• Main Authors: Aguilar-Durán, Jesús Alejandro, Hamer, Gabriel L, Reyes-Villanueva, Filiberto, Fernández-Santos, Nadia Angélica, Uriegas-Camargo, Sergio, Rodríguez-Martínez, Luis Mario, Estrada-Franco, José Guillermo, Rodríguez-Pérez, Mario Alberto
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Chemical weapons; Control; Dengue; Health aspects; Insect traps; Malaria; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Mosquitoes; Public health; Spinosad; Vector-borne diseases
• ISSN: 1756-3305; 1756-3305
• DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06361-y

Mosquito-borne diseases, such as malaria, dengue, Zika and chikungunya, pose significant public health threats in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide. To mitigate the impact of these diseases on human health, effective vector surveillance and control strategies are necessary. Traditional vector control methods, which rely on chemical agents such as insecticides and larvicides, face challenges such as resistance and environmental concerns. Consequently, there has been a push to explore novel surveillance and control tools. Mass trapping interventions have emerged as a promising and environmentally friendly approach to reducing the burden of mosquito-borne diseases. This study assessed mass-trapping interventions using autocidal gravid ovitraps (AGOs) on Aedes aegypti populations in Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Four neighborhoods were selected to evaluate the effects of three treatments: AGO mass-trapping, integrated vector control (IVC), which included source reduction and the application of chemical larvicide and adulticide, and AGO + IVC on Ae. aegypti populations. A control area with no interventions was also included. Only treatment using AGO mass trapping with an 84% coverage significantly reduced Ae. aegypti female populations by 47%, from 3.75 [+ or -] 0.32 to 1.96 [+ or -] 0.15 females/trap/week. As expected, the abundance of Ae. aegypti in the control area did not differ from the pre- and post-treatment period (range of 4.97 [+ or -] 0.59 to 5.78 [+ or -] 0.53); Ae. aegypti abundance in the IVC treatment was 3.47 [+ or -] 0.30 before and 4.13 [+ or -] 0.35 after, which was not significantly different. However, Ae. aegypti abundance in the AGO + IVC treatment increased from 1.43 [+ or -] 0.21 before to 2.11 [+ or -] 0.20 after interventions; this increase may be explained in part by the low AGO (56%) coverage. This is the first report to our knowledge on the effectiveness of mass-trapping interventions with AGOs in Mexico, establishing AGOs as a potential tool for controlling Ae. aegypti in Northeastern Mexico when deployed with sufficient coverage.