Loading…
Midterm outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-y gastric bypass: Single center experience
Introduction: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are successful surgical treatment options for morbid obesity. In this study, we aimed to share our results by comparing these two bypass techniques in a retrospective analysis. Materials and Methods: A retrospect...
Saved in:
Published in: | Laparoscopic endoscopic surgical science 2024-09, Vol.31 (3), p.127-132 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 132 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | Laparoscopic endoscopic surgical science |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Karagul, Servet Senol, Serdar Karakose, Oktay Eken, Huseyin |
description | Introduction: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are successful surgical treatment options for morbid obesity. In this study, we aimed to share our results by comparing these two bypass techniques in a retrospective analysis. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at a single center at Samsun Training and Research Hospital. The outcomes of two groups, laparoscopic OAGB and laparoscopic RYGB, were compared. Patients with a BMI over 40 kg/[m.sup.2] and patients with a BMI over 35 kg/[m.sup.2] with obesity-related comorbidities were included. Patient demographics, obesity-related comorbidities, medications, postoperative outcomes, percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), percentage total weight loss (%TWL), and postoperative BMI were recorded retrospectively. Results: A total of 64 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-one of the patients were female, and thirteen were male. There were 21 patients in the OAGB group and 43 patients in the RYGB group. The mean follow-up period was 42.86[+ or -]3.54 months in the OAGB group and 52.21[+ or -]11.58 months in the RYGB group (p0.05). The mean %EWL was 83.02[+ or -]18.95 and 76.08[+ or -]22.84, respectively (p>0.05). The mean BMI was 29.62[+ or -]5.42 kg/[m.sup.2] in the OAGB group and 30.14[+ or -]5.05 kg/[m.sup.2] in the RYGB group (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in the improvement of obesity-related comorbidities. However, de novo reflux was significantly higher in OAGB patients. Conclusion: OAGB and RYGB are both effective procedures for treating morbid obesity. Both procedures provide similar improvements in obesity-related diseases, although de novo reflux appears to be more common in OAGB patients. Keywords: Morbid obesity, one anastomosis gastric bypass, Roux-n-Y gastric bypass |
doi_str_mv | 10.14744/less.2024.26818 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A816482249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A816482249</galeid><sourcerecordid>A816482249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1508-c81aec19d54fef77c1611b995d9419714fab95c09546814533f3d490523404303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUU1LAzEQDaJgqb17DHjeNV_7EW-l-AUVwY9zSLOTEtndlEwr7b9323pQkTnMY-a9BzOPkEvOcq4qpa5bQMwFEyoXZc3rEzISRV1lrOTs9Ac-JxPED8aY0KUSQo5I-xSaNaSOxs3axQ6QRk9jD9T2FtexixiQLgeYgqOL3coi0k9IuEH6EjfbDPps92d_Q19Dv2yBOugHawrbFaQAvYMLcuZtizD57mPyfnf7NnvI5s_3j7PpPHO8YHXmam7Bcd0UyoOvKsdLzhdaF41WXFdcebvQhWO6UMOxqpDSy0ZpVgipmJJMjsnV0XdpWzCh93GdrOsCOjOtealqIZQeWPk_rKEa6IIbfuDDMP8lYEeBSxExgTerFDqbdoYzc8jB7HMw-xzMIQf5BZ76ey0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Midterm outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-y gastric bypass: Single center experience</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Karagul, Servet ; Senol, Serdar ; Karakose, Oktay ; Eken, Huseyin</creator><creatorcontrib>Karagul, Servet ; Senol, Serdar ; Karakose, Oktay ; Eken, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are successful surgical treatment options for morbid obesity. In this study, we aimed to share our results by comparing these two bypass techniques in a retrospective analysis. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at a single center at Samsun Training and Research Hospital. The outcomes of two groups, laparoscopic OAGB and laparoscopic RYGB, were compared. Patients with a BMI over 40 kg/[m.sup.2] and patients with a BMI over 35 kg/[m.sup.2] with obesity-related comorbidities were included. Patient demographics, obesity-related comorbidities, medications, postoperative outcomes, percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), percentage total weight loss (%TWL), and postoperative BMI were recorded retrospectively. Results: A total of 64 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-one of the patients were female, and thirteen were male. There were 21 patients in the OAGB group and 43 patients in the RYGB group. The mean follow-up period was 42.86[+ or -]3.54 months in the OAGB group and 52.21[+ or -]11.58 months in the RYGB group (p<0.05). The mean %TWL was 35.43[+ or -]5.26 in the OAGB group and 34.70[+ or -]11.31 in the RYGB group (p>0.05). The mean %EWL was 83.02[+ or -]18.95 and 76.08[+ or -]22.84, respectively (p>0.05). The mean BMI was 29.62[+ or -]5.42 kg/[m.sup.2] in the OAGB group and 30.14[+ or -]5.05 kg/[m.sup.2] in the RYGB group (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in the improvement of obesity-related comorbidities. However, de novo reflux was significantly higher in OAGB patients. Conclusion: OAGB and RYGB are both effective procedures for treating morbid obesity. Both procedures provide similar improvements in obesity-related diseases, although de novo reflux appears to be more common in OAGB patients. Keywords: Morbid obesity, one anastomosis gastric bypass, Roux-n-Y gastric bypass</description><identifier>ISSN: 2587-0610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2587-0610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14744/less.2024.26818</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>KARE Publishing</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Care and treatment ; Comorbidity ; Gastric bypass ; Health aspects ; Obesity ; Type 2 diabetes ; Women</subject><ispartof>Laparoscopic endoscopic surgical science, 2024-09, Vol.31 (3), p.127-132</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 KARE Publishing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karagul, Servet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senol, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakose, Oktay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eken, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><title>Midterm outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-y gastric bypass: Single center experience</title><title>Laparoscopic endoscopic surgical science</title><description>Introduction: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are successful surgical treatment options for morbid obesity. In this study, we aimed to share our results by comparing these two bypass techniques in a retrospective analysis. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at a single center at Samsun Training and Research Hospital. The outcomes of two groups, laparoscopic OAGB and laparoscopic RYGB, were compared. Patients with a BMI over 40 kg/[m.sup.2] and patients with a BMI over 35 kg/[m.sup.2] with obesity-related comorbidities were included. Patient demographics, obesity-related comorbidities, medications, postoperative outcomes, percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), percentage total weight loss (%TWL), and postoperative BMI were recorded retrospectively. Results: A total of 64 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-one of the patients were female, and thirteen were male. There were 21 patients in the OAGB group and 43 patients in the RYGB group. The mean follow-up period was 42.86[+ or -]3.54 months in the OAGB group and 52.21[+ or -]11.58 months in the RYGB group (p<0.05). The mean %TWL was 35.43[+ or -]5.26 in the OAGB group and 34.70[+ or -]11.31 in the RYGB group (p>0.05). The mean %EWL was 83.02[+ or -]18.95 and 76.08[+ or -]22.84, respectively (p>0.05). The mean BMI was 29.62[+ or -]5.42 kg/[m.sup.2] in the OAGB group and 30.14[+ or -]5.05 kg/[m.sup.2] in the RYGB group (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in the improvement of obesity-related comorbidities. However, de novo reflux was significantly higher in OAGB patients. Conclusion: OAGB and RYGB are both effective procedures for treating morbid obesity. Both procedures provide similar improvements in obesity-related diseases, although de novo reflux appears to be more common in OAGB patients. Keywords: Morbid obesity, one anastomosis gastric bypass, Roux-n-Y gastric bypass</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Gastric bypass</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>2587-0610</issn><issn>2587-0610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptUU1LAzEQDaJgqb17DHjeNV_7EW-l-AUVwY9zSLOTEtndlEwr7b9323pQkTnMY-a9BzOPkEvOcq4qpa5bQMwFEyoXZc3rEzISRV1lrOTs9Ac-JxPED8aY0KUSQo5I-xSaNaSOxs3axQ6QRk9jD9T2FtexixiQLgeYgqOL3coi0k9IuEH6EjfbDPps92d_Q19Dv2yBOugHawrbFaQAvYMLcuZtizD57mPyfnf7NnvI5s_3j7PpPHO8YHXmam7Bcd0UyoOvKsdLzhdaF41WXFdcebvQhWO6UMOxqpDSy0ZpVgipmJJMjsnV0XdpWzCh93GdrOsCOjOtealqIZQeWPk_rKEa6IIbfuDDMP8lYEeBSxExgTerFDqbdoYzc8jB7HMw-xzMIQf5BZ76ey0</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Karagul, Servet</creator><creator>Senol, Serdar</creator><creator>Karakose, Oktay</creator><creator>Eken, Huseyin</creator><general>KARE Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Midterm outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-y gastric bypass: Single center experience</title><author>Karagul, Servet ; Senol, Serdar ; Karakose, Oktay ; Eken, Huseyin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1508-c81aec19d54fef77c1611b995d9419714fab95c09546814533f3d490523404303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Gastric bypass</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karagul, Servet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senol, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakose, Oktay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eken, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Laparoscopic endoscopic surgical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karagul, Servet</au><au>Senol, Serdar</au><au>Karakose, Oktay</au><au>Eken, Huseyin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Midterm outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-y gastric bypass: Single center experience</atitle><jtitle>Laparoscopic endoscopic surgical science</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>127-132</pages><issn>2587-0610</issn><eissn>2587-0610</eissn><abstract>Introduction: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are successful surgical treatment options for morbid obesity. In this study, we aimed to share our results by comparing these two bypass techniques in a retrospective analysis. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at a single center at Samsun Training and Research Hospital. The outcomes of two groups, laparoscopic OAGB and laparoscopic RYGB, were compared. Patients with a BMI over 40 kg/[m.sup.2] and patients with a BMI over 35 kg/[m.sup.2] with obesity-related comorbidities were included. Patient demographics, obesity-related comorbidities, medications, postoperative outcomes, percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), percentage total weight loss (%TWL), and postoperative BMI were recorded retrospectively. Results: A total of 64 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-one of the patients were female, and thirteen were male. There were 21 patients in the OAGB group and 43 patients in the RYGB group. The mean follow-up period was 42.86[+ or -]3.54 months in the OAGB group and 52.21[+ or -]11.58 months in the RYGB group (p<0.05). The mean %TWL was 35.43[+ or -]5.26 in the OAGB group and 34.70[+ or -]11.31 in the RYGB group (p>0.05). The mean %EWL was 83.02[+ or -]18.95 and 76.08[+ or -]22.84, respectively (p>0.05). The mean BMI was 29.62[+ or -]5.42 kg/[m.sup.2] in the OAGB group and 30.14[+ or -]5.05 kg/[m.sup.2] in the RYGB group (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in the improvement of obesity-related comorbidities. However, de novo reflux was significantly higher in OAGB patients. Conclusion: OAGB and RYGB are both effective procedures for treating morbid obesity. Both procedures provide similar improvements in obesity-related diseases, although de novo reflux appears to be more common in OAGB patients. Keywords: Morbid obesity, one anastomosis gastric bypass, Roux-n-Y gastric bypass</abstract><pub>KARE Publishing</pub><doi>10.14744/less.2024.26818</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2587-0610 |
ispartof | Laparoscopic endoscopic surgical science, 2024-09, Vol.31 (3), p.127-132 |
issn | 2587-0610 2587-0610 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A816482249 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Analysis Care and treatment Comorbidity Gastric bypass Health aspects Obesity Type 2 diabetes Women |
title | Midterm outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-y gastric bypass: Single center experience |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A08%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Midterm%20outcomes%20of%20one%20anastomosis%20gastric%20bypass%20versus%20Roux-en-y%20gastric%20bypass:%20Single%20center%20experience&rft.jtitle=Laparoscopic%20endoscopic%20surgical%20science&rft.au=Karagul,%20Servet&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=127-132&rft.issn=2587-0610&rft.eissn=2587-0610&rft_id=info:doi/10.14744/less.2024.26818&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA816482249%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1508-c81aec19d54fef77c1611b995d9419714fab95c09546814533f3d490523404303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A816482249&rfr_iscdi=true |