The importance of dissolved organic carbon fluxes for the carbon balance of a temperate Scots pine forest

• Published in: Agricultural and forest meteorology 2011-03, Vol.151 (3), p.270-278
• Main Authors: Gielen, B., Neirynck, J., Luyssaert, S., Janssens, I.A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: accuracy; Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage; Agricultural and forest meteorology; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions; Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; bias; biogeochemical cycles; Biological and medical sciences; Carbon; carbon dioxide; carbon sequestration; cell respiration; dissolved organic carbon; Drainage; Ecosystem production; ecosystem respiration; Ecosystems; Eddies; Eddy covariance; eddy covariance method; Fluxes; forest trees; forested watersheds; Forests; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; gas emissions; General agronomy. Plant production; Lateral carbon fluxes; leaching; Pine; Pinus sylvestris; Pinus sylvestris L; primary productivity; Productivity; Sciences of the Universe; soil respiration; surface water; Synecology; temperate forests; temporal variation; terrestrial carbon balance; Water balance; Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration
• ISSN: 0168-1923; 1873-2240
• DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.10.012

▶ Research highlights ▶ DOC fluxes represent on average 10% of the net ecosystem productivity a temperate Scots pine forests site. ▶ Inter- and intra-annual variability of DOC fluxes is mainly driven by water drainage. ▶ DOC fluxes should be accounted for when assessing carbon balances of forest sites. Efforts to increase our understanding of the terrestrial carbon balance have resulted in a dense global network of eddy covariance towers, which are able to measure the net ecosystem exchange of CO 2, H 2O and energy between ecosystems and the atmosphere. However, the typical set-up on an eddy covariance tower does not monitor lateral CO 2- and carbon fluxes such as dissolved organic carbon (DOC). By ignoring DOC fluxes eddy covariance-based CO 2 balances overestimate the carbon sink of ecosystems as part of the DOC drains into the inland waters and get respired outside the footprint of the eddy covariance tower. In this study we quantify 7 years (2000–2006) of DOC fluxes from a temperate Scots pine forest in Belgium and analyse its inter-annual variability. On average, 10 gC m −2 year −1 is leached from the pine forest as DOC. If the DOC fluxes are considered relative to the gross ecosystem carbon fluxes we see that DOC fluxes are small: 0.8 ± 0.2% relative to gross primary productivity, 1.0 ± 0.3% relative to ecosystem respiration, and (2.4 ± 0.4%) relative to soil respiration. However, when compared to net fluxes such as net ecosystem productivity and net biome productivity the DOC flux is no longer negligible (11 ± 7% and 17%, respectively), especially because the DOC losses constitute a systematic bias and not a random error. The inter-annual variability of the DOC fluxes followed that of annual water drainage. Hence, drainage drives DOC leaching at both short and long time scales. Finally, it is noted that part of the carbon that is leached from the ecosystem as DOC is respired or sequestered elsewhere, so the physical boundaries of accounting should always be reported together with the carbon budget.