Loading…

Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past or present patterns?

Changes in landscape pattern under the control of agriculture intensification are considered to be an important driver of biodiversity and often a threat for conservation. The response of species to landscape changes is complex, including possible time lags, and depends on the taxonomic group. The s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biological conservation 2006, Vol.127 (1), p.1-17
Main Authors: Ernoult, Aude, Tremauville, Yves, Cellier, Dominique, Margerie, Pierre, Langlois, Estelle, Alard, Didier
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Biological conservation
container_volume 127
creator Ernoult, Aude
Tremauville, Yves
Cellier, Dominique
Margerie, Pierre
Langlois, Estelle
Alard, Didier
description Changes in landscape pattern under the control of agriculture intensification are considered to be an important driver of biodiversity and often a threat for conservation. The response of species to landscape changes is complex, including possible time lags, and depends on the taxonomic group. The search for surrogate species or surrogate data for biodiversity is confronted with this complexity. This study was conducted on two taxonomic groups (birds and vascular plants) for 20 sites each of 1 km 2 equally distributed in the Seine valley floodplain. For plants, two habitats were studied: grasslands and hedges. We used a generalised additive model (GAM) and co-inertia analyses to determine whether present or past landscape attributes can best explain the biodiversity components (structure and composition). This study confirms the major role of landscape pattern attributes for predicting some metrics of biodiversity, e.g. species richness. But this study shows that potential drivers of biodiversity come from both the past and present landscape patterns. The quality of surrogates for biodiversity is strongly dependent on understanding the importance of past conditions. This suggests the need for more functional surrogates, taking into account the situation of equilibrium or non-equilibrium between biodiversity and its drivers.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00014194v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320705002922</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0006320705002922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwDxi8MDAk2HESJwygqgKKVIkOMFsXfwhXqR3ZUaX-e1yCYGM63fl5zroXoWtKckpofbfNO-uld3lBSJUTnhPSnKAZbTjLipbyUzQjhNQZKwg_RxcxblPLWV3NULfxo3ajhR734FSUMGisgt3rELE3OC1W340dD1j63eBdwiO2DgM2vfcKDz1Yd483EEfsAx6CjgnBA4yjDi4-XqIzA33UVz91jj6en96Xq2z99vK6XKwzyTgZs1rWNQWjFDeG8KYwqmIFdG3ZNbRrW8MgvUpV1B1VjEnZFbSrFOclByZLBWyObqe9n9CLIdgdhIPwYMVqsRbHWTqalrQt9zSx5cTK4GMM2vwKlIhjpmIrpkzFMVNBeLKbpN1M2gApqd4EcNLGP5cXdduUZeIeJk6ne_dWBxGl1U5qZYOWo1De_v_RFw8MkFM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past or present patterns?</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Ernoult, Aude ; Tremauville, Yves ; Cellier, Dominique ; Margerie, Pierre ; Langlois, Estelle ; Alard, Didier</creator><creatorcontrib>Ernoult, Aude ; Tremauville, Yves ; Cellier, Dominique ; Margerie, Pierre ; Langlois, Estelle ; Alard, Didier</creatorcontrib><description>Changes in landscape pattern under the control of agriculture intensification are considered to be an important driver of biodiversity and often a threat for conservation. The response of species to landscape changes is complex, including possible time lags, and depends on the taxonomic group. The search for surrogate species or surrogate data for biodiversity is confronted with this complexity. This study was conducted on two taxonomic groups (birds and vascular plants) for 20 sites each of 1 km 2 equally distributed in the Seine valley floodplain. For plants, two habitats were studied: grasslands and hedges. We used a generalised additive model (GAM) and co-inertia analyses to determine whether present or past landscape attributes can best explain the biodiversity components (structure and composition). This study confirms the major role of landscape pattern attributes for predicting some metrics of biodiversity, e.g. species richness. But this study shows that potential drivers of biodiversity come from both the past and present landscape patterns. The quality of surrogates for biodiversity is strongly dependent on understanding the importance of past conditions. This suggests the need for more functional surrogates, taking into account the situation of equilibrium or non-equilibrium between biodiversity and its drivers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Co-inertia analyses ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Continental interfaces, environment ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; GAM ; General aspects ; Landscape history ; Sciences of the Universe ; Species diversity ; Surrogate ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 2006, Vol.127 (1), p.1-17</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4902-9691 ; 0000-0003-2703-908X ; 0000-0003-1595-2998</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17269844$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00014194$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ernoult, Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremauville, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cellier, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margerie, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langlois, Estelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alard, Didier</creatorcontrib><title>Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past or present patterns?</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>Changes in landscape pattern under the control of agriculture intensification are considered to be an important driver of biodiversity and often a threat for conservation. The response of species to landscape changes is complex, including possible time lags, and depends on the taxonomic group. The search for surrogate species or surrogate data for biodiversity is confronted with this complexity. This study was conducted on two taxonomic groups (birds and vascular plants) for 20 sites each of 1 km 2 equally distributed in the Seine valley floodplain. For plants, two habitats were studied: grasslands and hedges. We used a generalised additive model (GAM) and co-inertia analyses to determine whether present or past landscape attributes can best explain the biodiversity components (structure and composition). This study confirms the major role of landscape pattern attributes for predicting some metrics of biodiversity, e.g. species richness. But this study shows that potential drivers of biodiversity come from both the past and present landscape patterns. The quality of surrogates for biodiversity is strongly dependent on understanding the importance of past conditions. This suggests the need for more functional surrogates, taking into account the situation of equilibrium or non-equilibrium between biodiversity and its drivers.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Co-inertia analyses</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Continental interfaces, environment</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>GAM</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Landscape history</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Surrogate</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwDxi8MDAk2HESJwygqgKKVIkOMFsXfwhXqR3ZUaX-e1yCYGM63fl5zroXoWtKckpofbfNO-uld3lBSJUTnhPSnKAZbTjLipbyUzQjhNQZKwg_RxcxblPLWV3NULfxo3ajhR734FSUMGisgt3rELE3OC1W340dD1j63eBdwiO2DgM2vfcKDz1Yd483EEfsAx6CjgnBA4yjDi4-XqIzA33UVz91jj6en96Xq2z99vK6XKwzyTgZs1rWNQWjFDeG8KYwqmIFdG3ZNbRrW8MgvUpV1B1VjEnZFbSrFOclByZLBWyObqe9n9CLIdgdhIPwYMVqsRbHWTqalrQt9zSx5cTK4GMM2vwKlIhjpmIrpkzFMVNBeLKbpN1M2gApqd4EcNLGP5cXdduUZeIeJk6ne_dWBxGl1U5qZYOWo1De_v_RFw8MkFM</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Ernoult, Aude</creator><creator>Tremauville, Yves</creator><creator>Cellier, Dominique</creator><creator>Margerie, Pierre</creator><creator>Langlois, Estelle</creator><creator>Alard, Didier</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4902-9691</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2703-908X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-2998</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past or present patterns?</title><author>Ernoult, Aude ; Tremauville, Yves ; Cellier, Dominique ; Margerie, Pierre ; Langlois, Estelle ; Alard, Didier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Co-inertia analyses</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Continental interfaces, environment</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>GAM</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Landscape history</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Surrogate</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ernoult, Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremauville, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cellier, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margerie, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langlois, Estelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alard, Didier</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ernoult, Aude</au><au>Tremauville, Yves</au><au>Cellier, Dominique</au><au>Margerie, Pierre</au><au>Langlois, Estelle</au><au>Alard, Didier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past or present patterns?</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>1-17</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>Changes in landscape pattern under the control of agriculture intensification are considered to be an important driver of biodiversity and often a threat for conservation. The response of species to landscape changes is complex, including possible time lags, and depends on the taxonomic group. The search for surrogate species or surrogate data for biodiversity is confronted with this complexity. This study was conducted on two taxonomic groups (birds and vascular plants) for 20 sites each of 1 km 2 equally distributed in the Seine valley floodplain. For plants, two habitats were studied: grasslands and hedges. We used a generalised additive model (GAM) and co-inertia analyses to determine whether present or past landscape attributes can best explain the biodiversity components (structure and composition). This study confirms the major role of landscape pattern attributes for predicting some metrics of biodiversity, e.g. species richness. But this study shows that potential drivers of biodiversity come from both the past and present landscape patterns. The quality of surrogates for biodiversity is strongly dependent on understanding the importance of past conditions. This suggests the need for more functional surrogates, taking into account the situation of equilibrium or non-equilibrium between biodiversity and its drivers.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.008</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4902-9691</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2703-908X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-2998</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3207
ispartof Biological conservation, 2006, Vol.127 (1), p.1-17
issn 0006-3207
1873-2917
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00014194v1
source Elsevier
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Co-inertia analyses
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Continental interfaces, environment
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
GAM
General aspects
Landscape history
Sciences of the Universe
Species diversity
Surrogate
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
title Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past or present patterns?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T03%3A46%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20landscape%20drivers%20of%20biodiversity%20components%20in%20a%20flood%20plain:%20Past%20or%20present%20patterns?&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Ernoult,%20Aude&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=1-17&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.008&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES0006320705002922%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true