Loading…
Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past or present patterns?
Changes in landscape pattern under the control of agriculture intensification are considered to be an important driver of biodiversity and often a threat for conservation. The response of species to landscape changes is complex, including possible time lags, and depends on the taxonomic group. The s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biological conservation 2006, Vol.127 (1), p.1-17 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3 |
container_end_page | 17 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Biological conservation |
container_volume | 127 |
creator | Ernoult, Aude Tremauville, Yves Cellier, Dominique Margerie, Pierre Langlois, Estelle Alard, Didier |
description | Changes in landscape pattern under the control of agriculture intensification are considered to be an important driver of biodiversity and often a threat for conservation. The response of species to landscape changes is complex, including possible time lags, and depends on the taxonomic group. The search for surrogate species or surrogate data for biodiversity is confronted with this complexity.
This study was conducted on two taxonomic groups (birds and vascular plants) for 20 sites each of 1
km
2 equally distributed in the Seine valley floodplain. For plants, two habitats were studied: grasslands and hedges. We used a generalised additive model (GAM) and co-inertia analyses to determine whether present or past landscape attributes can best explain the biodiversity components (structure and composition). This study confirms the major role of landscape pattern attributes for predicting some metrics of biodiversity, e.g. species richness. But this study shows that potential drivers of biodiversity come from both the past and present landscape patterns. The quality of surrogates for biodiversity is strongly dependent on understanding the importance of past conditions. This suggests the need for more functional surrogates, taking into account the situation of equilibrium or non-equilibrium between biodiversity and its drivers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00014194v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320705002922</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0006320705002922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwDxi8MDAk2HESJwygqgKKVIkOMFsXfwhXqR3ZUaX-e1yCYGM63fl5zroXoWtKckpofbfNO-uld3lBSJUTnhPSnKAZbTjLipbyUzQjhNQZKwg_RxcxblPLWV3NULfxo3ajhR734FSUMGisgt3rELE3OC1W340dD1j63eBdwiO2DgM2vfcKDz1Yd483EEfsAx6CjgnBA4yjDi4-XqIzA33UVz91jj6en96Xq2z99vK6XKwzyTgZs1rWNQWjFDeG8KYwqmIFdG3ZNbRrW8MgvUpV1B1VjEnZFbSrFOclByZLBWyObqe9n9CLIdgdhIPwYMVqsRbHWTqalrQt9zSx5cTK4GMM2vwKlIhjpmIrpkzFMVNBeLKbpN1M2gApqd4EcNLGP5cXdduUZeIeJk6ne_dWBxGl1U5qZYOWo1De_v_RFw8MkFM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past or present patterns?</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Ernoult, Aude ; Tremauville, Yves ; Cellier, Dominique ; Margerie, Pierre ; Langlois, Estelle ; Alard, Didier</creator><creatorcontrib>Ernoult, Aude ; Tremauville, Yves ; Cellier, Dominique ; Margerie, Pierre ; Langlois, Estelle ; Alard, Didier</creatorcontrib><description>Changes in landscape pattern under the control of agriculture intensification are considered to be an important driver of biodiversity and often a threat for conservation. The response of species to landscape changes is complex, including possible time lags, and depends on the taxonomic group. The search for surrogate species or surrogate data for biodiversity is confronted with this complexity.
This study was conducted on two taxonomic groups (birds and vascular plants) for 20 sites each of 1
km
2 equally distributed in the Seine valley floodplain. For plants, two habitats were studied: grasslands and hedges. We used a generalised additive model (GAM) and co-inertia analyses to determine whether present or past landscape attributes can best explain the biodiversity components (structure and composition). This study confirms the major role of landscape pattern attributes for predicting some metrics of biodiversity, e.g. species richness. But this study shows that potential drivers of biodiversity come from both the past and present landscape patterns. The quality of surrogates for biodiversity is strongly dependent on understanding the importance of past conditions. This suggests the need for more functional surrogates, taking into account the situation of equilibrium or non-equilibrium between biodiversity and its drivers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Co-inertia analyses ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Continental interfaces, environment ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; GAM ; General aspects ; Landscape history ; Sciences of the Universe ; Species diversity ; Surrogate ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 2006, Vol.127 (1), p.1-17</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4902-9691 ; 0000-0003-2703-908X ; 0000-0003-1595-2998</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17269844$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00014194$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ernoult, Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremauville, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cellier, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margerie, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langlois, Estelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alard, Didier</creatorcontrib><title>Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past or present patterns?</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>Changes in landscape pattern under the control of agriculture intensification are considered to be an important driver of biodiversity and often a threat for conservation. The response of species to landscape changes is complex, including possible time lags, and depends on the taxonomic group. The search for surrogate species or surrogate data for biodiversity is confronted with this complexity.
This study was conducted on two taxonomic groups (birds and vascular plants) for 20 sites each of 1
km
2 equally distributed in the Seine valley floodplain. For plants, two habitats were studied: grasslands and hedges. We used a generalised additive model (GAM) and co-inertia analyses to determine whether present or past landscape attributes can best explain the biodiversity components (structure and composition). This study confirms the major role of landscape pattern attributes for predicting some metrics of biodiversity, e.g. species richness. But this study shows that potential drivers of biodiversity come from both the past and present landscape patterns. The quality of surrogates for biodiversity is strongly dependent on understanding the importance of past conditions. This suggests the need for more functional surrogates, taking into account the situation of equilibrium or non-equilibrium between biodiversity and its drivers.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Co-inertia analyses</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Continental interfaces, environment</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>GAM</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Landscape history</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Surrogate</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwDxi8MDAk2HESJwygqgKKVIkOMFsXfwhXqR3ZUaX-e1yCYGM63fl5zroXoWtKckpofbfNO-uld3lBSJUTnhPSnKAZbTjLipbyUzQjhNQZKwg_RxcxblPLWV3NULfxo3ajhR734FSUMGisgt3rELE3OC1W340dD1j63eBdwiO2DgM2vfcKDz1Yd483EEfsAx6CjgnBA4yjDi4-XqIzA33UVz91jj6en96Xq2z99vK6XKwzyTgZs1rWNQWjFDeG8KYwqmIFdG3ZNbRrW8MgvUpV1B1VjEnZFbSrFOclByZLBWyObqe9n9CLIdgdhIPwYMVqsRbHWTqalrQt9zSx5cTK4GMM2vwKlIhjpmIrpkzFMVNBeLKbpN1M2gApqd4EcNLGP5cXdduUZeIeJk6ne_dWBxGl1U5qZYOWo1De_v_RFw8MkFM</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Ernoult, Aude</creator><creator>Tremauville, Yves</creator><creator>Cellier, Dominique</creator><creator>Margerie, Pierre</creator><creator>Langlois, Estelle</creator><creator>Alard, Didier</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4902-9691</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2703-908X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-2998</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past or present patterns?</title><author>Ernoult, Aude ; Tremauville, Yves ; Cellier, Dominique ; Margerie, Pierre ; Langlois, Estelle ; Alard, Didier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Co-inertia analyses</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Continental interfaces, environment</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>GAM</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Landscape history</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Surrogate</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ernoult, Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremauville, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cellier, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margerie, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langlois, Estelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alard, Didier</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ernoult, Aude</au><au>Tremauville, Yves</au><au>Cellier, Dominique</au><au>Margerie, Pierre</au><au>Langlois, Estelle</au><au>Alard, Didier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past or present patterns?</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>1-17</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>Changes in landscape pattern under the control of agriculture intensification are considered to be an important driver of biodiversity and often a threat for conservation. The response of species to landscape changes is complex, including possible time lags, and depends on the taxonomic group. The search for surrogate species or surrogate data for biodiversity is confronted with this complexity.
This study was conducted on two taxonomic groups (birds and vascular plants) for 20 sites each of 1
km
2 equally distributed in the Seine valley floodplain. For plants, two habitats were studied: grasslands and hedges. We used a generalised additive model (GAM) and co-inertia analyses to determine whether present or past landscape attributes can best explain the biodiversity components (structure and composition). This study confirms the major role of landscape pattern attributes for predicting some metrics of biodiversity, e.g. species richness. But this study shows that potential drivers of biodiversity come from both the past and present landscape patterns. The quality of surrogates for biodiversity is strongly dependent on understanding the importance of past conditions. This suggests the need for more functional surrogates, taking into account the situation of equilibrium or non-equilibrium between biodiversity and its drivers.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.008</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4902-9691</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2703-908X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-2998</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3207 |
ispartof | Biological conservation, 2006, Vol.127 (1), p.1-17 |
issn | 0006-3207 1873-2917 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00014194v1 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Aves Biological and medical sciences Co-inertia analyses Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Continental interfaces, environment Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology GAM General aspects Landscape history Sciences of the Universe Species diversity Surrogate Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution |
title | Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past or present patterns? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T03%3A46%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20landscape%20drivers%20of%20biodiversity%20components%20in%20a%20flood%20plain:%20Past%20or%20present%20patterns?&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Ernoult,%20Aude&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=1-17&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.008&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES0006320705002922%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6c661afdd7ff0782fd532ab94b81b99f3a1afcd26b1d33ccb21b5d7747a3c4da3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |