The effects of agricultural fields and human settlements on the use of rivers by wildlife in the mid-Zambezi valley, Zimbabwe

• Published in: Landscape ecology 2003, Vol.18 (3), p.293-302
• Main Authors: FRITZ, Hervé, SAÏD, Sonia, RENAUD, Pierre-Cyril, MUTAKE, Snoden, COID, Craig, MONICAT, Francois
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural land; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Applied ecology; Biodiversity and Ecology; Biological and medical sciences; Carnivores; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife; Environment and Society; Environmental Sciences; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General aspects; Global Changes; Herbivores; Human settlements; Mammalia; River beds; Rivers; Ungulata; Valleys; Wildlife
• ISSN: 0921-2973; 1572-9761
• DOI: 10.1023/A:1024411711670

After the eradication of the Tse-Tse fly in the Mid-Zambezi valley, human settlements and fields extended mainly along the main rivers. In order to investigate the consequences of this human development on wildlife diversity we monitored three rivers of the Mid-Zambezi valley in Zimbabwe: Angwa, Manyame and Kadzi. The rivers were divided in segments of 200 m which were checked for spoors in order to assess the number of species and the number of individuals that used the segments. Human settlements were also recorded. We used a GIS to define the spatial characteristics of the fields present along the rivers, and related them to the distribution and abundance of wild species spoors in the river beds and banks. Our results show that the number of species in one segment of the river decreased with the increasing size of the field area bordering the segment. For all the major ungulate species, the numbers of individuals recorded per segment decreased with increasing field area. A similar trend was observed for small and medium-sized carnivores, though they were in lower numbers when present. Our analyses thus confirm that the extension of human agriculture in wildlife areas has an impact on most wild species, but we also define some threshold value of field size above which there seem to be an acceleration of the decrease in wildlife density and diversity: 3.2 ha for medium and small herbivores and carnivores; only the elephant seem to tolerate larger field area with a threshold value of 32 ha.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]