Loading…

An evolutionary model of low mood states

It has been suggested that low mood in humans is an adaptive response to unfavourable circumstances, and that the anhedonia, pessimism and fatigue that often accompany it function to minimise risk until circumstances improve. While this is plausible, it would be possible to make the opposite predict...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of theoretical biology 2009-03, Vol.257 (1), p.100-103
Main Author: Nettle, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cb9b675926ff5a0602dd09983e09f78b7e214124c6354e03cade1d09e2fe6a533
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cb9b675926ff5a0602dd09983e09f78b7e214124c6354e03cade1d09e2fe6a533
container_end_page 103
container_issue 1
container_start_page 100
container_title Journal of theoretical biology
container_volume 257
creator Nettle, Daniel
description It has been suggested that low mood in humans is an adaptive response to unfavourable circumstances, and that the anhedonia, pessimism and fatigue that often accompany it function to minimise risk until circumstances improve. While this is plausible, it would be possible to make the opposite prediction equally plausibly: individuals in bad circumstances should take greater risks in order to improve their situations. Here, I present a simple analytical model adapted from the risk-sensitive foraging literature. It shows that in dire states, individuals should be risk-prone, in poor states, risk-averse, and in good states, risk-prone again. I discuss how the various kinds of mood state observed in humans might be understood as mechanisms for adaptively adjusting behavioural risk-taking to the current situation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.10.033
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00554525v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022519308005717</els_id><sourcerecordid>66914286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cb9b675926ff5a0602dd09983e09f78b7e214124c6354e03cade1d09e2fe6a533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMotlb_gAuZlehi6stnJ-CmFLVCwY2uQybzBlOmTZ1MK_57M7ToTlchl3Mvj0PIJYUxBaruluNlV_oxAyhSMAbOj8iQgpZ5IQU9JkMAxnJJNR-QsxiXAKAFV6dkQDWogjEYkpvpOsNdaLadD2vbfmWrUGGThTprwmf6hCqLne0wnpOT2jYRLw7viLw9PrzO5vni5el5Nl3kTije5a7UpZpIzVRdSwsKWFWB1gVH0PWkKCfIqKBMOMWlQODOVkgTgaxGZSXnI3K73323jdm0fpWOMsF6M58uTJ8BSCkkkzua2Os9u2nDxxZjZ1Y-Omwau8awjUYpTQUr1L8gS-6Y4iKBbA-6NsTYYv1zAgXTSzdL00s3vfQ-S8VUujqsb8sVVr-Vg-UE3O8BTOJ2HlsTnce1w8q36DpTBf_X_jekiI_c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20332634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evolutionary model of low mood states</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nettle, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Nettle, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>It has been suggested that low mood in humans is an adaptive response to unfavourable circumstances, and that the anhedonia, pessimism and fatigue that often accompany it function to minimise risk until circumstances improve. While this is plausible, it would be possible to make the opposite prediction equally plausibly: individuals in bad circumstances should take greater risks in order to improve their situations. Here, I present a simple analytical model adapted from the risk-sensitive foraging literature. It shows that in dire states, individuals should be risk-prone, in poor states, risk-averse, and in good states, risk-prone again. I discuss how the various kinds of mood state observed in humans might be understood as mechanisms for adaptively adjusting behavioural risk-taking to the current situation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5193</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.10.033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19068220</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Affect - physiology ; Animals ; Biological Evolution ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Depression ; Depression - genetics ; Humans ; Mania ; Models, Genetic ; Models, Psychological ; Mood ; Risk-sensitivity ; Risk-Taking</subject><ispartof>Journal of theoretical biology, 2009-03, Vol.257 (1), p.100-103</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cb9b675926ff5a0602dd09983e09f78b7e214124c6354e03cade1d09e2fe6a533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cb9b675926ff5a0602dd09983e09f78b7e214124c6354e03cade1d09e2fe6a533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19068220$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00554525$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nettle, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>An evolutionary model of low mood states</title><title>Journal of theoretical biology</title><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><description>It has been suggested that low mood in humans is an adaptive response to unfavourable circumstances, and that the anhedonia, pessimism and fatigue that often accompany it function to minimise risk until circumstances improve. While this is plausible, it would be possible to make the opposite prediction equally plausibly: individuals in bad circumstances should take greater risks in order to improve their situations. Here, I present a simple analytical model adapted from the risk-sensitive foraging literature. It shows that in dire states, individuals should be risk-prone, in poor states, risk-averse, and in good states, risk-prone again. I discuss how the various kinds of mood state observed in humans might be understood as mechanisms for adaptively adjusting behavioural risk-taking to the current situation.</description><subject>Affect - physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depression - genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mania</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Mood</subject><subject>Risk-sensitivity</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><issn>0022-5193</issn><issn>1095-8541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMotlb_gAuZlehi6stnJ-CmFLVCwY2uQybzBlOmTZ1MK_57M7ToTlchl3Mvj0PIJYUxBaruluNlV_oxAyhSMAbOj8iQgpZ5IQU9JkMAxnJJNR-QsxiXAKAFV6dkQDWogjEYkpvpOsNdaLadD2vbfmWrUGGThTprwmf6hCqLne0wnpOT2jYRLw7viLw9PrzO5vni5el5Nl3kTije5a7UpZpIzVRdSwsKWFWB1gVH0PWkKCfIqKBMOMWlQODOVkgTgaxGZSXnI3K73323jdm0fpWOMsF6M58uTJ8BSCkkkzua2Os9u2nDxxZjZ1Y-Omwau8awjUYpTQUr1L8gS-6Y4iKBbA-6NsTYYv1zAgXTSzdL00s3vfQ-S8VUujqsb8sVVr-Vg-UE3O8BTOJ2HlsTnce1w8q36DpTBf_X_jekiI_c</recordid><startdate>20090307</startdate><enddate>20090307</enddate><creator>Nettle, Daniel</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090307</creationdate><title>An evolutionary model of low mood states</title><author>Nettle, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cb9b675926ff5a0602dd09983e09f78b7e214124c6354e03cade1d09e2fe6a533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Affect - physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depression - genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mania</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Mood</topic><topic>Risk-sensitivity</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nettle, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nettle, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evolutionary model of low mood states</atitle><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><date>2009-03-07</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>257</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>100-103</pages><issn>0022-5193</issn><eissn>1095-8541</eissn><abstract>It has been suggested that low mood in humans is an adaptive response to unfavourable circumstances, and that the anhedonia, pessimism and fatigue that often accompany it function to minimise risk until circumstances improve. While this is plausible, it would be possible to make the opposite prediction equally plausibly: individuals in bad circumstances should take greater risks in order to improve their situations. Here, I present a simple analytical model adapted from the risk-sensitive foraging literature. It shows that in dire states, individuals should be risk-prone, in poor states, risk-averse, and in good states, risk-prone again. I discuss how the various kinds of mood state observed in humans might be understood as mechanisms for adaptively adjusting behavioural risk-taking to the current situation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19068220</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.10.033</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5193
ispartof Journal of theoretical biology, 2009-03, Vol.257 (1), p.100-103
issn 0022-5193
1095-8541
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00554525v1
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Affect - physiology
Animals
Biological Evolution
Choice Behavior - physiology
Depression
Depression - genetics
Humans
Mania
Models, Genetic
Models, Psychological
Mood
Risk-sensitivity
Risk-Taking
title An evolutionary model of low mood states
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T15%3A52%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evolutionary%20model%20of%20low%20mood%20states&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20theoretical%20biology&rft.au=Nettle,%20Daniel&rft.date=2009-03-07&rft.volume=257&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=100-103&rft.issn=0022-5193&rft.eissn=1095-8541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.10.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E66914286%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cb9b675926ff5a0602dd09983e09f78b7e214124c6354e03cade1d09e2fe6a533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20332634&rft_id=info:pmid/19068220&rfr_iscdi=true