Loading…
Endogenous debt constraints in collateralized economies with default penalties
The objective of the paper is to propose endogenous debt constraints that rule out Ponzi schemes and ensure the existence of equilibria in a model with limited commitment and (possible) default. We appropriately modify the definition of finitely effective debt constraints, introduced by Levine and Z...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of mathematical economics 2012, Vol.48 (1), p.1-13 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The objective of the paper is to propose endogenous debt constraints that rule out Ponzi schemes and ensure the existence of equilibria in a model with limited commitment and (possible) default. We appropriately modify the definition of finitely effective debt constraints, introduced by
Levine and Zame (1996) (see also
Levine and Zame (2002)), to encompass models with limited commitment, default penalties and collateral. Along this line, we introduce in the setting of
Araujo et al. (2002),
Kubler and Schmedders (2003) and
Páscoa and Seghir (2009) the concept of actions with
finite equivalent payoffs. We show that, independent of the level of default penalties, restricting plans to have finite equivalent payoffs rules out Ponzi schemes and guarantees the existence of an equilibrium that is compatible with the minimal ability to borrow and lend that we expect in our model.
An interesting feature of our debt constraints is that they give rise to budget sets that coincide with the standard budget sets of economies having a collateral structure but no penalties (as defined in
Araujo et al. (2002)). This illustrates the hidden relation between finitely effective debt constraints and collateral requirements. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0304-4068 1873-1538 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jmateco.2011.09.006 |