Loading…

Thoughts on kaizen and its evolution: Three different perspectives and guiding principles

Purpose - Since Masaaki Imai coined the term Kaizen in the mid 1980s it has been regarded as a key element in the competitiveness of Japanese companies. However, even though Kaizen was defined by the author who created the term, writings by scholars and practitioners in the field exhibit a certain d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of lean six sigma 2011-11, Vol.2 (4), p.288-308
Main Authors: Suárez‐Barraza, Manuel F., Ramis‐Pujol, Juan, Kerbache, Laoucine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-71d26e64989112c159df33e76c231d830f4d9dd0f0507508b400d6acdf7d5da23
container_end_page 308
container_issue 4
container_start_page 288
container_title International journal of lean six sigma
container_volume 2
creator Suárez‐Barraza, Manuel F.
Ramis‐Pujol, Juan
Kerbache, Laoucine
description Purpose - Since Masaaki Imai coined the term Kaizen in the mid 1980s it has been regarded as a key element in the competitiveness of Japanese companies. However, even though Kaizen was defined by the author who created the term, writings by scholars and practitioners in the field exhibit a certain degree of ambiguity and inconsistency. Finally, there is a clear need to develop this theory in the field of operations management. The purpose of this paper is to analyse Kaizen in the academic and practitioner literature, in order to better understand it and further explore and contribute to its potential theoretical profile. Design/methodology/approach - A literature review was carried out using Kaizen as a search term. Various databases were used for this purpose and books written by both scholars and by practitioners on the subject were also consulted. The literature concerning Kaizen was methodically analysed and categorised. Findings - The findings of the study indicate that Kaizen is presently displayed under three perspectives or umbrellas, which include a series of principles and techniques. By comparing the three perspectives, a set of guiding principles and/or cornerstones for Kaizen have also emerged. Research limitations/implications - Analysis and classification is based on the literature that has been found and reviewed, along with the knowledge of authors on the subject, and may include other features as well as other angles of analysis. Practical implications - The Kaizen literature review is very limited. In writing this paper a considerable number of articles and research related to Kaizen has been reviewed. This review resulted in an initial classification of Kaizen (three umbrellas) and four major topics, which may prove useful for managers or executives who are introducing or developing Kaizen in their organizations. Originality/value - As far as the authors are aware, this is one of the first papers that proposes a literature review in an attempt to clarify Kaizen, both in academic and practitioner ambits.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/20401461111189407
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00796340v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_00796340v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-71d26e64989112c159df33e76c231d830f4d9dd0f0507508b400d6acdf7d5da23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkDFPwzAQhS0EElXpD2DLwMIQuLMdOx6rCmilSCxltkzOJoEQozitBL-eRkVduOWdvnvvhsfYNcIdIpT3HCSgVDhNaSToMzabWC5Ry_PTrtQlW6T0DgAImhtlZuxm28TdWzOmLPbZh2t_fJ-5nrL2QPw-druxjf0VuwiuS37xp3P28viwXa3z6vlps1pWec0FjrlG4soraUqDyGssDAUhvFbTmUoBQZIhggAF6ALKVwlAytUUNBXkuJiz2-PfxnX2a2g_3fBto2vtelnZiQFoo4SEPR68ePTWQ0xp8OEUQLBTK_ZfK-IX43RRTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thoughts on kaizen and its evolution: Three different perspectives and guiding principles</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Suárez‐Barraza, Manuel F. ; Ramis‐Pujol, Juan ; Kerbache, Laoucine</creator><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Barraza, Manuel F. ; Ramis‐Pujol, Juan ; Kerbache, Laoucine</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - Since Masaaki Imai coined the term Kaizen in the mid 1980s it has been regarded as a key element in the competitiveness of Japanese companies. However, even though Kaizen was defined by the author who created the term, writings by scholars and practitioners in the field exhibit a certain degree of ambiguity and inconsistency. Finally, there is a clear need to develop this theory in the field of operations management. The purpose of this paper is to analyse Kaizen in the academic and practitioner literature, in order to better understand it and further explore and contribute to its potential theoretical profile. Design/methodology/approach - A literature review was carried out using Kaizen as a search term. Various databases were used for this purpose and books written by both scholars and by practitioners on the subject were also consulted. The literature concerning Kaizen was methodically analysed and categorised. Findings - The findings of the study indicate that Kaizen is presently displayed under three perspectives or umbrellas, which include a series of principles and techniques. By comparing the three perspectives, a set of guiding principles and/or cornerstones for Kaizen have also emerged. Research limitations/implications - Analysis and classification is based on the literature that has been found and reviewed, along with the knowledge of authors on the subject, and may include other features as well as other angles of analysis. Practical implications - The Kaizen literature review is very limited. In writing this paper a considerable number of articles and research related to Kaizen has been reviewed. This review resulted in an initial classification of Kaizen (three umbrellas) and four major topics, which may prove useful for managers or executives who are introducing or developing Kaizen in their organizations. Originality/value - As far as the authors are aware, this is one of the first papers that proposes a literature review in an attempt to clarify Kaizen, both in academic and practitioner ambits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2040-4166</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-4174</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/20401461111189407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Emerald Publishing</publisher><subject>Business administration ; domain_shs.gestion.man-op ; Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>International journal of lean six sigma, 2011-11, Vol.2 (4), p.288-308</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-71d26e64989112c159df33e76c231d830f4d9dd0f0507508b400d6acdf7d5da23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hec.hal.science/hal-00796340$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Barraza, Manuel F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramis‐Pujol, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerbache, Laoucine</creatorcontrib><title>Thoughts on kaizen and its evolution: Three different perspectives and guiding principles</title><title>International journal of lean six sigma</title><description>Purpose - Since Masaaki Imai coined the term Kaizen in the mid 1980s it has been regarded as a key element in the competitiveness of Japanese companies. However, even though Kaizen was defined by the author who created the term, writings by scholars and practitioners in the field exhibit a certain degree of ambiguity and inconsistency. Finally, there is a clear need to develop this theory in the field of operations management. The purpose of this paper is to analyse Kaizen in the academic and practitioner literature, in order to better understand it and further explore and contribute to its potential theoretical profile. Design/methodology/approach - A literature review was carried out using Kaizen as a search term. Various databases were used for this purpose and books written by both scholars and by practitioners on the subject were also consulted. The literature concerning Kaizen was methodically analysed and categorised. Findings - The findings of the study indicate that Kaizen is presently displayed under three perspectives or umbrellas, which include a series of principles and techniques. By comparing the three perspectives, a set of guiding principles and/or cornerstones for Kaizen have also emerged. Research limitations/implications - Analysis and classification is based on the literature that has been found and reviewed, along with the knowledge of authors on the subject, and may include other features as well as other angles of analysis. Practical implications - The Kaizen literature review is very limited. In writing this paper a considerable number of articles and research related to Kaizen has been reviewed. This review resulted in an initial classification of Kaizen (three umbrellas) and four major topics, which may prove useful for managers or executives who are introducing or developing Kaizen in their organizations. Originality/value - As far as the authors are aware, this is one of the first papers that proposes a literature review in an attempt to clarify Kaizen, both in academic and practitioner ambits.</description><subject>Business administration</subject><subject>domain_shs.gestion.man-op</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><issn>2040-4166</issn><issn>2040-4174</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkDFPwzAQhS0EElXpD2DLwMIQuLMdOx6rCmilSCxltkzOJoEQozitBL-eRkVduOWdvnvvhsfYNcIdIpT3HCSgVDhNaSToMzabWC5Ry_PTrtQlW6T0DgAImhtlZuxm28TdWzOmLPbZh2t_fJ-5nrL2QPw-druxjf0VuwiuS37xp3P28viwXa3z6vlps1pWec0FjrlG4soraUqDyGssDAUhvFbTmUoBQZIhggAF6ALKVwlAytUUNBXkuJiz2-PfxnX2a2g_3fBto2vtelnZiQFoo4SEPR68ePTWQ0xp8OEUQLBTK_ZfK-IX43RRTA</recordid><startdate>20111122</startdate><enddate>20111122</enddate><creator>Suárez‐Barraza, Manuel F.</creator><creator>Ramis‐Pujol, Juan</creator><creator>Kerbache, Laoucine</creator><general>Emerald Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111122</creationdate><title>Thoughts on kaizen and its evolution</title><author>Suárez‐Barraza, Manuel F. ; Ramis‐Pujol, Juan ; Kerbache, Laoucine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-71d26e64989112c159df33e76c231d830f4d9dd0f0507508b400d6acdf7d5da23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Business administration</topic><topic>domain_shs.gestion.man-op</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Barraza, Manuel F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramis‐Pujol, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerbache, Laoucine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>International journal of lean six sigma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suárez‐Barraza, Manuel F.</au><au>Ramis‐Pujol, Juan</au><au>Kerbache, Laoucine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thoughts on kaizen and its evolution: Three different perspectives and guiding principles</atitle><jtitle>International journal of lean six sigma</jtitle><date>2011-11-22</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>288</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>288-308</pages><issn>2040-4166</issn><eissn>2040-4174</eissn><abstract>Purpose - Since Masaaki Imai coined the term Kaizen in the mid 1980s it has been regarded as a key element in the competitiveness of Japanese companies. However, even though Kaizen was defined by the author who created the term, writings by scholars and practitioners in the field exhibit a certain degree of ambiguity and inconsistency. Finally, there is a clear need to develop this theory in the field of operations management. The purpose of this paper is to analyse Kaizen in the academic and practitioner literature, in order to better understand it and further explore and contribute to its potential theoretical profile. Design/methodology/approach - A literature review was carried out using Kaizen as a search term. Various databases were used for this purpose and books written by both scholars and by practitioners on the subject were also consulted. The literature concerning Kaizen was methodically analysed and categorised. Findings - The findings of the study indicate that Kaizen is presently displayed under three perspectives or umbrellas, which include a series of principles and techniques. By comparing the three perspectives, a set of guiding principles and/or cornerstones for Kaizen have also emerged. Research limitations/implications - Analysis and classification is based on the literature that has been found and reviewed, along with the knowledge of authors on the subject, and may include other features as well as other angles of analysis. Practical implications - The Kaizen literature review is very limited. In writing this paper a considerable number of articles and research related to Kaizen has been reviewed. This review resulted in an initial classification of Kaizen (three umbrellas) and four major topics, which may prove useful for managers or executives who are introducing or developing Kaizen in their organizations. Originality/value - As far as the authors are aware, this is one of the first papers that proposes a literature review in an attempt to clarify Kaizen, both in academic and practitioner ambits.</abstract><pub>Emerald Publishing</pub><doi>10.1108/20401461111189407</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2040-4166
ispartof International journal of lean six sigma, 2011-11, Vol.2 (4), p.288-308
issn 2040-4166
2040-4174
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00796340v1
source ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Business administration
domain_shs.gestion.man-op
Humanities and Social Sciences
title Thoughts on kaizen and its evolution: Three different perspectives and guiding principles
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A12%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thoughts%20on%20kaizen%20and%20its%20evolution:%20Three%20different%20perspectives%20and%20guiding%20principles&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20lean%20six%20sigma&rft.au=Su%C3%A1rez%E2%80%90Barraza,%20Manuel%20F.&rft.date=2011-11-22&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=288&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=288-308&rft.issn=2040-4166&rft.eissn=2040-4174&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/20401461111189407&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_00796340v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-71d26e64989112c159df33e76c231d830f4d9dd0f0507508b400d6acdf7d5da23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true