Reply to “Comment on ‘Insight into Organometallic Intermediate and Its Evolution to Covalent Bonding in Surface-Confined Ullmann Polymerization’”

• Published in: ACS nano 2014-03, Vol.8 (3), p.1969-1971
• Main Authors: Di Giovannantonio, Marco, El Garah, Mohamed, Lipton-Duffin, Josh, Meunier, Vincent, Cardenas, Luis, Fagot-Revurat, Yannick, Cossaro, Albano, Verdini, Alberto, Perepichka, Dmitrii F, Rosei, Federico, Contini, Giorgio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Condensed Matter; Materials Science; Physics
• ISSN: 1936-0851; 1936-086X
• DOI: 10.1021/nn500322r

Song comments on our recent paper, (1) stating “it is apparent that the conclusion drawn from the XPS measurements and analysis is questionable, and the discussion of the XPS section was not well addressed”. (2)In this reply, we show that while some of Song’s comments are pertinent to certain technical aspects of photoelectron spectroscopy, most of his assumptions are unjustified and the critique as a whole does not alter any of the scientific conclusions of our original work. The combination of scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and first-principles calculations fully supports our interpretation of the reported results, that is, the transition from an organometallic to polymeric phase.Below we respond to the specific criticisms raised by Song. The discussion of these points was not included in the original article to maintain its clarity for a broad audience.