Thirty years of Biology & Philosophy: philosophy of which biology?

Which domains of biology do philosophers of biology primarily study? The fact that philosophy of biology has been dominated by an interest for evolutionary biology is widely admitted, but it has not been strictly demonstrated. Here I analyse the topics of all the papers published in Biology & Ph...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biology & philosophy 2017-03, Vol.32 (2), p.149-167
Main Author: Pradeu, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Education
Evolutionary Biology
History, Philosophy and Sociology of Sciences
Humanities and Social Sciences
Philosophy
Philosophy of Biology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-6882b583662574c0450734edad485e84f5e8d56791e2327f25fdcafa7fb9cd63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-6882b583662574c0450734edad485e84f5e8d56791e2327f25fdcafa7fb9cd63
container_end_page 167
container_issue 2
container_start_page 149
container_title Biology & philosophy
container_volume 32
creator Pradeu, Thomas
description Which domains of biology do philosophers of biology primarily study? The fact that philosophy of biology has been dominated by an interest for evolutionary biology is widely admitted, but it has not been strictly demonstrated. Here I analyse the topics of all the papers published in Biology & Philosophy , just as the journal celebrates its thirtieth anniversary. I then compare the distribution of biological topics in Biology & Philosophy with that of the scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA , focusing on the recent period 2003–2015. This comparison reveals a significant mismatch between the distributions of these topics. I examine plausible explanations for that mismatch. Finally, I argue that many biological topics underrepresented in philosophy of biology raise important philosophical issues and should therefore play a more central role in future philosophy of biology.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10539-016-9558-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01421934v2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A551030763</galeid><sourcerecordid>A551030763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-6882b583662574c0450734edad485e84f5e8d56791e2327f25fdcafa7fb9cd63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10u-LFCEYB3CJgrarP6B3A8HRvZjL3zq9ib2juoOFova9uI7ueLjjpjPV_Pc5TFy3UQgq-vkKPjwAvETwEkEo3mQEGWlqiHjdMCZr8QisEBO4lhTSx2BVLpqaSC6egmc530EIOaVoBa62nU_DVE1Wp1xFV135GOJ-qs6rz50PMcdjN72tjvf72fzovOmq3SLfPQdPnA7Zvvi9noHth_fb65t68-nj7fV6UxuG2FBzKfGOScI5ZoIaSBkUhNpWt1QyK6krU8u4aJDFBAuHmWuNdlq4XWNaTs7AxfJsp4M6Jn_QaVJRe3Wz3qj5DCKKUUPod1zs68UeU_w22jyog8_GhqB7G8eskBRCFg1hoa_-ondxTH35yKww402D6R-118Eq37s4JG3mR9WaMQQJFJwUdfkPVUZrD97E3jpfzk8CFyeBYgb7c9jrMWd1-_XLqT1_YDurw9DlGMbBxz6fQrRAk2LOybr7aiGo5mZRS7OUgnE1N4sSJYOXTC6239v0oAr_Df0CaYG7aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1872569924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thirty years of Biology &amp; Philosophy: philosophy of which biology?</title><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><creator>Pradeu, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Pradeu, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Which domains of biology do philosophers of biology primarily study? The fact that philosophy of biology has been dominated by an interest for evolutionary biology is widely admitted, but it has not been strictly demonstrated. Here I analyse the topics of all the papers published in Biology &amp; Philosophy , just as the journal celebrates its thirtieth anniversary. I then compare the distribution of biological topics in Biology &amp; Philosophy with that of the scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA , focusing on the recent period 2003–2015. This comparison reveals a significant mismatch between the distributions of these topics. I examine plausible explanations for that mismatch. Finally, I argue that many biological topics underrepresented in philosophy of biology raise important philosophical issues and should therefore play a more central role in future philosophy of biology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-3867</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8404</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10539-016-9558-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Education ; Evolutionary Biology ; History, Philosophy and Sociology of Sciences ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Biology</subject><ispartof>Biology &amp; philosophy, 2017-03, Vol.32 (2), p.149-167</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Biology &amp; Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-6882b583662574c0450734edad485e84f5e8d56791e2327f25fdcafa7fb9cd63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-6882b583662574c0450734edad485e84f5e8d56791e2327f25fdcafa7fb9cd63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6590-3281</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01421934$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pradeu, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Thirty years of Biology &amp; Philosophy: philosophy of which biology?</title><title>Biology &amp; philosophy</title><addtitle>Biol Philos</addtitle><description>Which domains of biology do philosophers of biology primarily study? The fact that philosophy of biology has been dominated by an interest for evolutionary biology is widely admitted, but it has not been strictly demonstrated. Here I analyse the topics of all the papers published in Biology &amp; Philosophy , just as the journal celebrates its thirtieth anniversary. I then compare the distribution of biological topics in Biology &amp; Philosophy with that of the scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA , focusing on the recent period 2003–2015. This comparison reveals a significant mismatch between the distributions of these topics. I examine plausible explanations for that mismatch. Finally, I argue that many biological topics underrepresented in philosophy of biology raise important philosophical issues and should therefore play a more central role in future philosophy of biology.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>History, Philosophy and Sociology of Sciences</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Biology</subject><issn>0169-3867</issn><issn>1572-8404</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10u-LFCEYB3CJgrarP6B3A8HRvZjL3zq9ib2juoOFova9uI7ueLjjpjPV_Pc5TFy3UQgq-vkKPjwAvETwEkEo3mQEGWlqiHjdMCZr8QisEBO4lhTSx2BVLpqaSC6egmc530EIOaVoBa62nU_DVE1Wp1xFV135GOJ-qs6rz50PMcdjN72tjvf72fzovOmq3SLfPQdPnA7Zvvi9noHth_fb65t68-nj7fV6UxuG2FBzKfGOScI5ZoIaSBkUhNpWt1QyK6krU8u4aJDFBAuHmWuNdlq4XWNaTs7AxfJsp4M6Jn_QaVJRe3Wz3qj5DCKKUUPod1zs68UeU_w22jyog8_GhqB7G8eskBRCFg1hoa_-ondxTH35yKww402D6R-118Eq37s4JG3mR9WaMQQJFJwUdfkPVUZrD97E3jpfzk8CFyeBYgb7c9jrMWd1-_XLqT1_YDurw9DlGMbBxz6fQrRAk2LOybr7aiGo5mZRS7OUgnE1N4sSJYOXTC6239v0oAr_Df0CaYG7aw</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Pradeu, Thomas</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PGAAH</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6590-3281</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Thirty years of Biology &amp; Philosophy: philosophy of which biology?</title><author>Pradeu, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-6882b583662574c0450734edad485e84f5e8d56791e2327f25fdcafa7fb9cd63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>History, Philosophy and Sociology of Sciences</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Biology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pradeu, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Religion &amp; Philosophy</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Biology &amp; philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pradeu, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thirty years of Biology &amp; Philosophy: philosophy of which biology?</atitle><jtitle>Biology &amp; philosophy</jtitle><stitle>Biol Philos</stitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>149-167</pages><issn>0169-3867</issn><eissn>1572-8404</eissn><abstract>Which domains of biology do philosophers of biology primarily study? The fact that philosophy of biology has been dominated by an interest for evolutionary biology is widely admitted, but it has not been strictly demonstrated. Here I analyse the topics of all the papers published in Biology &amp; Philosophy , just as the journal celebrates its thirtieth anniversary. I then compare the distribution of biological topics in Biology &amp; Philosophy with that of the scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA , focusing on the recent period 2003–2015. This comparison reveals a significant mismatch between the distributions of these topics. I examine plausible explanations for that mismatch. Finally, I argue that many biological topics underrepresented in philosophy of biology raise important philosophical issues and should therefore play a more central role in future philosophy of biology.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10539-016-9558-7</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6590-3281</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-3867
ispartof Biology & philosophy, 2017-03, Vol.32 (2), p.149-167
issn 0169-3867
1572-8404
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01421934v2
source Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List
subjects Analysis
Education
Evolutionary Biology
History, Philosophy and Sociology of Sciences
Humanities and Social Sciences
Philosophy
Philosophy of Biology
title Thirty years of Biology & Philosophy: philosophy of which biology?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-06T12%3A51%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thirty%20years%20of%20Biology%20&%20Philosophy:%20philosophy%20of%20which%20biology?&rft.jtitle=Biology%20&%20philosophy&rft.au=Pradeu,%20Thomas&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=149-167&rft.issn=0169-3867&rft.eissn=1572-8404&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10539-016-9558-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_hal_p%3EA551030763%3C/gale_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-6882b583662574c0450734edad485e84f5e8d56791e2327f25fdcafa7fb9cd63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1872569924&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A551030763&rfr_iscdi=true