Cumulative semantic interference is blind to language: Implications for models of bilingual speech production

• Published in: Journal of memory and language 2012-05, Vol.66 (4), p.850-869
• Main Authors: Runnqvist, Elin, Strijkers, Kristof, Alario, F.-Xavier, Costa, Albert
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bilingualism; Bilingualism. Multilingualism; Biological and medical sciences; Cognitive science; Cumulative semantic interference; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Intercultural Communication; Interference (Language); Language; Language control; Language Processing; Language Research; Linguistic Theory; Linguistics; Monolingualism; Production and perception of spoken language; Psychology; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Romance Languages; Semantic competitor effect; Semantics; Semiotics; Spanish; Speech; Speech production
• ISSN: 0749-596X; 1096-0821
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.007

► Cumulative semantic interference occurs to the same extent within and across languages. ► Language control is not achieved through global and sustained inhibition of the language not in use. ► Lexical selection is not language specific. ► Bilingual and monolingual speech production need not be qualitatively different. Several studies have shown that concepts spread activation to words of both of a bilingual’s languages. Therefore, a central issue that needs to be clarified is how a bilingual manages to restrict his speech production to a single language. One influential proposal is that when speaking in one language, the other language is inhibited. An alternative hypothesis is that bilinguals focus only on the language that is relevant for communication. Here these proposals were tested in a series of experiments in which Spanish–Catalan bilinguals named pictures. Cumulative semantic interference (CSI) was used as a window into lexical processing and cross-linguistic interactions. Results revealed that CSI is present between languages with the same magnitude as within-languages. This result cannot be accounted for by any of the above-mentioned models without substantial modifications. Instead, they are suggestive of bilingual processing dynamics qualitatively similar to those of monolinguals.